Comments on: Forwarding Dallas / Atelier Data + MOOV

By: Miguel

Miguel — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:32:51 +0000

To Opium:

Why find complex solution to solve simple problems? So you can say in a FASHIONABLE way that its a complex solution? Moov avoid the “complexity” that many architects preach about without really knowing what they are talking about. That is one of the reasons that make that studio so good. It reminds me of a conference of Eduardo Souto Moura in 2007 where he talks about becoming more interested in Gordon’s Matta Clark work. HIS is from the seventies and he only understands it now?!!!!!! If you read carefully the project you would find that its a green project not just because of the plants and of the solar panels. But your eye is poor, i understand you can’t pass trough the faces of the people living there, and see the real architecture.
I could go on and explain you why MOOV’s work is so relevant but all of the sudden, while i am writing this a question poped in my head: why the hell should i waste my time on such an ignorant person!

By: Vertical Farm Startup Peer Learning Topic Request (Part 2 of 3) « The omniGenerations Blog – beta

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:46:41 +0000

[...] 5. Architectural news websites for architects – ArchDaily, reVision Dallas / Entangled Bank – Provide some insight on one of the winning entry that won a self sustainable mixed development clean eco-city architectural design competition. The architectural design competition name is Re: Vision Dallas competition – http://www.archdaily.com/30383/revision-dallas-entangled-bank/ - Remark: An example of mixed urban vertical farm, commercial, office, retail,dining, entertainment and residential mixed development integrated eco-city project complex. This article contains links to two other winners. The two winners are DB + P and Atelier Data + Moov . [...]

By: Concepts and Proposals

Concepts and Proposals — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:58:31 +0000

[...] Dallas competition named three winners, two of which we previously featured on AD (DB + P and Atelier Data + Moov). The third winner is Little, a studio based in North Carolina, with their Entangled Bank [...]

By: JP from Dallas

JP from Dallas — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:25:17 +0000

Love the conceptual diagrams but the end results is crappy looking. Not to mention, This is another entry that didn’t follow programs given.

By: john

john — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:46:42 +0000

opium , we dont need any more portuguese douche bags on this site, theres too many already

By: Francisco

Francisco — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:53:50 +0000

I can see many similarities with the project of Tatiana Bilbao of Planta de Liquidos in Guadalajra, Mexico done in the 2005.
Link:
http://www.baunetz.de/meldungen/Meldungen-Neues_Kulturzentrum_fuer_Mexiko_745932.html?source=nl

By: joaquin

joaquin — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:29:04 +0000

proyecto arq. bioclimatica y urbanistica

By: Xing

Xing — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:50:49 +0000

all we need is critical review. guys, please make it AMAP.

By: Paul

Paul — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:59:23 +0000

I gotta backup Rui here. Why all this hate Opium? When this is, in fact, a good preoject – probably not the best entry, but still a very good project. Did you even try reading the description?

google’s tranlation: Man stop giving bad name to the Portuguese architecture that is pathetic … … architecture touch sweet.

‘bad name’? by winning the competition with a good project? sorry but you’re not making any sense.

BTW what the hell is pingo doce/touch sweet? (lol)

By: zn

zn — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:15:34 +0000

hey guys…take it easy, long live pingo doce…