
Writhing Tower, designed by LYCS Architecture, is a sky condo for one of the most beautiful residential zones in Lima. The proposal is for a global architectural competition initiated by ARQUIA, an international development firm interested in commissioning architecture as art. Each unit is rotated 45 degrees to create a cruciform shape in plan and the appearance of a linear hinged volume. It enables each unit to have uninterrupted views to both the public park in front of the site, and the ocean to the rear of the site. More images and architects’ description after the break.

Additionally, each unit has blocked views to the unit above and below it, so as to create extra privacy. Each unit is a two-story townhouse, with a terrace for a garden with trees, and a pool with a deck. Due to the uniqueness of the geometric play in the overall tower form, each terrace is able to receive the tropical sunshine and breeze. The metal hypar that connects the second floor plate to the underside of the unit above projects the user’s view out from the structure due to the way that the smooth surface blends the two box geometries. Consequently, the hinged volume takes on the appearance of being twisted from unit to unit, up the structure. A mesh triangle is added to provide additional sun protection and synthetic connection to the hypar form.

The project is an experimentation of contemporary design tendencies, henceforth standing out for its uniqueness in regards to the traditional or substandard urban tissue of Lima, Peru.
Architects: LYCS Architecture
Location: Lima, Peru
Design Team: Hao Ruan, Devin Jernigan, Vedrana Puhalo, Max Peterschmidt
Project Area: 9507M²
Date: March, 2012
- Courtesy of LYCS Architecture
- Courtesy of LYCS Architecture
- Courtesy of LYCS Architecture
- model 01
- model 02
- model 03
- model 04
- model 05
- plans
- plans and sections
- diagram












Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
好水!跟我大四时做的一个高层写字楼极像,可是这个也太没深度了,结构都没考虑。。。archdaily现在真是。。。
it should be more radical, if the architect wants to ignore structure and pragmatic sense of architecture.
no visionary, not architectural.I don’t know what this is….
Why SHOULD it be more radical? It looks fine and almost functional. Do you build radical monuments?