<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House 02 / za bor Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:16:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim Costyrin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-245573</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim Costyrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-245573</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @za_bor: ArchDaily about our underground building -- House in Nicolas&#039; Hill http://fb.me/LP0PKv8V&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @za_bor: ArchDaily about our underground building &#8212; House in Nicolas&#39; Hill <a href="http://fb.me/LP0PKv8V" rel="nofollow">http://fb.me/LP0PKv8V</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: za bor</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-242937</link>
		<dc:creator>za bor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-242937</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;ArchDaily about our underground building -- House in Nicolas&#039; Hill http://fb.me/LP0PKv8V&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">ArchDaily about our underground building &#8212; House in Nicolas&#39; Hill <a href="http://fb.me/LP0PKv8V" rel="nofollow">http://fb.me/LP0PKv8V</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flavin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-238573</link>
		<dc:creator>flavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-238573</guid>
		<description>Great house, i like to live there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great house, i like to live there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim Costyrin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-219839</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim Costyrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-219839</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;House 02 / za bor Architects &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/LYt256X via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">House 02 / za bor Architects | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/LYt256X" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/LYt256X</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Afonso Condi</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-171961</link>
		<dc:creator>Afonso Condi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 01:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-171961</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/?f=selected&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content"><a href="http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/?f=selected" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/?f=selected</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36767</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36767</guid>
		<description>Interesting design but nothing special about the exterior form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting design but nothing special about the exterior form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2MACoff</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36184</link>
		<dc:creator>2MACoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36184</guid>
		<description>&quot;А&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;А&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BROSALIN</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36173</link>
		<dc:creator>BROSALIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36173</guid>
		<description>крутой дом.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>крутой дом.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blc</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36135</link>
		<dc:creator>blc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36135</guid>
		<description>It looks like an industrial building - cold, boring, expressless - defenetly not like a house to live!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like an industrial building &#8211; cold, boring, expressless &#8211; defenetly not like a house to live!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HppyRobot</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36127</link>
		<dc:creator>HppyRobot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36127</guid>
		<description>Главное, что проект вызывает обсуждение. А если и сказать нечего, то уж совсем все плохо. 

The main thing is - that house makes you something to say about itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Главное, что проект вызывает обсуждение. А если и сказать нечего, то уж совсем все плохо. </p>
<p>The main thing is &#8211; that house makes you something to say about itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbad</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36080</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36080</guid>
		<description>brilliant.. spacious..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brilliant.. spacious..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36072</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36072</guid>
		<description>Good house and actually it is very functional for a family, not too spaced out and not to boxed together, just enough play.
The architects understand the daily living. The children&#039;s room is the one I think could be done with something else. But otherwise, good job! Molodci :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good house and actually it is very functional for a family, not too spaced out and not to boxed together, just enough play.<br />
The architects understand the daily living. The children&#8217;s room is the one I think could be done with something else. But otherwise, good job! Molodci :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viniruski</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36060</link>
		<dc:creator>viniruski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36060</guid>
		<description>Not anorexic like contemporary flush contrapuntal facades that are so gay and ubiquitous nowadays.  Refreshing to see some shadow lines, kinda like when you&#039;re slaving away in some sweatshop, drafting or modelling the design of your boss who&#039;s an old coot, and he says, &quot;We need more shadow lines on the facade!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not anorexic like contemporary flush contrapuntal facades that are so gay and ubiquitous nowadays.  Refreshing to see some shadow lines, kinda like when you&#8217;re slaving away in some sweatshop, drafting or modelling the design of your boss who&#8217;s an old coot, and he says, &#8220;We need more shadow lines on the facade!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo Lucky</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36054</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36054</guid>
		<description>Very impressive interiors designed by a talented interior designer. The functional layout of the house and its exterior form are poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very impressive interiors designed by a talented interior designer. The functional layout of the house and its exterior form are poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balkan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36051</link>
		<dc:creator>Balkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36051</guid>
		<description>Well considering what kind of &quot;structures&quot; can be seen all over eastern block I could say that this is decent.
Problem is that most of the people in Russia, Ukraine and other eastern countries define modern western house as cold and soulless. That&#039;s why western criteria hardly can be promoted.
I live in Serbia so I could say that most of the post-communist contries have this &quot;problem&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well considering what kind of &#8220;structures&#8221; can be seen all over eastern block I could say that this is decent.<br />
Problem is that most of the people in Russia, Ukraine and other eastern countries define modern western house as cold and soulless. That&#8217;s why western criteria hardly can be promoted.<br />
I live in Serbia so I could say that most of the post-communist contries have this &#8220;problem&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafael martin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-86814</link>
		<dc:creator>rafael martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-86814</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;#architecture House 02 / za bor Architects  http://bit.ly/g8fmI (via Archdaily)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">#architecture House 02 / za bor Architects  <a href="http://bit.ly/g8fmI" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/g8fmI</a> (via Archdaily)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36046</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36046</guid>
		<description>THis house is bulky and ugly. The roof deck looks empty and seems like it will never be used and the giant white box seems like it will fall off at any moment...perhaps for the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THis house is bulky and ugly. The roof deck looks empty and seems like it will never be used and the giant white box seems like it will fall off at any moment&#8230;perhaps for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yzyly</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36045</link>
		<dc:creator>yzyly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36045</guid>
		<description>i think it&#039;s not worth to be displayed among valuable pieces of architecture. sorry guys, but neither volumes, nor colours, nor functional scheme is impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it&#8217;s not worth to be displayed among valuable pieces of architecture. sorry guys, but neither volumes, nor colours, nor functional scheme is impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kew</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36042</link>
		<dc:creator>kew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36042</guid>
		<description>Is that architecture?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that architecture?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanna</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23845/house-02-za-bor-architects/#comment-36041</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23845#comment-36041</guid>
		<description>Очень нравится цветовая гамма, дощатая терраса, объемная композиция. Газон еще больше дополняет приятное впечатление )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Очень нравится цветовая гамма, дощатая терраса, объемная композиция. Газон еще больше дополняет приятное впечатление )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 16:20:10 by W3 Total Cache -->
