<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research Library in Hradec Kralove / Projektil Architekti</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/23731/research-library-in-hradec-kralove-projektil-architekti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23731/research-library-in-hradec-kralove-projektil-architekti/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:40:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23731/research-library-in-hradec-kralove-projektil-architekti/#comment-73988</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23731#comment-73988</guid>
		<description>looks a lot like the Mexico City airport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks a lot like the Mexico City airport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Research Library in the Czech Republic &#124; SNEAKHYPE - your daily dose of dopeness -- online magazine of fresh kicks, art, clothes, culture, and ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23731/research-library-in-hradec-kralove-projektil-architekti/#comment-36457</link>
		<dc:creator>Research Library in the Czech Republic &#124; SNEAKHYPE - your daily dose of dopeness -- online magazine of fresh kicks, art, clothes, culture, and ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23731#comment-36457</guid>
		<description>[...] archdaily  .gallery { margin: auto; } .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] archdaily  .gallery { margin: auto; } .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viniruski</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23731/research-library-in-hradec-kralove-projektil-architekti/#comment-35631</link>
		<dc:creator>viniruski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23731#comment-35631</guid>
		<description>Lucas:  

I&#039;m thinking a grander atrium like Sharon&#039;s library in Berlin, or OMA&#039;s library in Seattle where there are numerous atria penetrating through the floors ties all the spaces together.  

The axos shown here seem appropriate given the stretched &#039;x&#039; cruciform, but they don&#039;t really show any hierarchy of spaces or elements as any architectural eye desires to see, and as a result looks like some legacy of Czech communism.  The form has the potential for something really significant:  an intersection?  a meeting place?  or even a means of emphasizing contrast or contradiction.  I don&#039;t know.  Too early in the morning.  

Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas:  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking a grander atrium like Sharon&#8217;s library in Berlin, or OMA&#8217;s library in Seattle where there are numerous atria penetrating through the floors ties all the spaces together.  </p>
<p>The axos shown here seem appropriate given the stretched &#8216;x&#8217; cruciform, but they don&#8217;t really show any hierarchy of spaces or elements as any architectural eye desires to see, and as a result looks like some legacy of Czech communism.  The form has the potential for something really significant:  an intersection?  a meeting place?  or even a means of emphasizing contrast or contradiction.  I don&#8217;t know.  Too early in the morning.  </p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23731/research-library-in-hradec-kralove-projektil-architekti/#comment-35586</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23731#comment-35586</guid>
		<description>There is an atrium right in the middle with nice spiraling stair cases. Not sure what the question is, viniruski. I do agree that a site plan with some context would give a better understanding to its form.

I love the facade and the interior spaces seem open, well lit and comfortable. Elegant materials and nice detailing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an atrium right in the middle with nice spiraling stair cases. Not sure what the question is, viniruski. I do agree that a site plan with some context would give a better understanding to its form.</p>
<p>I love the facade and the interior spaces seem open, well lit and comfortable. Elegant materials and nice detailing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viniruski</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23731/research-library-in-hradec-kralove-projektil-architekti/#comment-35562</link>
		<dc:creator>viniruski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23731#comment-35562</guid>
		<description>Massing and form loses conviction of a potentially strong central space where various elements converge.  Perhaps an atrium space smack in the middle?  Or have configure circulation to establish view lines from one end of the floor to another?  Plans look really fragmented without any tying elements.  But it&#039;s nice to see a concrete facade with subtle nuances on each face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massing and form loses conviction of a potentially strong central space where various elements converge.  Perhaps an atrium space smack in the middle?  Or have configure circulation to establish view lines from one end of the floor to another?  Plans look really fragmented without any tying elements.  But it&#8217;s nice to see a concrete facade with subtle nuances on each face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMO ARCH</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23731/research-library-in-hradec-kralove-projektil-architekti/#comment-35557</link>
		<dc:creator>CMO ARCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23731#comment-35557</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t mind a site plan, otherwise I think this is great!  Facade work looks very nice and simple.  But the site plan might help me make sense of the overall shape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t mind a site plan, otherwise I think this is great!  Facade work looks very nice and simple.  But the site plan might help me make sense of the overall shape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
