<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Westwood Residence / CHA:COL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:44:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mookie Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/#comment-36546</link>
		<dc:creator>Mookie Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23594#comment-36546</guid>
		<description>House of the Year 1988!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House of the Year 1988!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Glenn Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/#comment-36393</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Glenn Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23594#comment-36393</guid>
		<description>@ Sam

What heritage would you be speaking of?  Westwood is a postwar development of tract homes.  They were ordinary middle class houses in their day, all  2 x 4&#039;s and drywall and little else.  The only heritage was the G.I. Bill.  Over time and owing to their adjacency to Beverly Hills the values went through the roof.  However, the houses remain what they always were, cracker boxes.

The term McMansion does not speak to any particular architectural style beyond the fact that it is largely inappropriate for the place it is built and takes no consideration of the site.  Usually the term implies a structure which maximizes square footage on a too small lot.  The difference between a McMansion and a nice house has everything to do with proportion and appropriateness.  

Yes, I would agree that this is squarely an interior design and remodeling project.  Thus the question, which comes up ever more often here, why is it featured on Architecture Daily?  Perhaps these kinds of projects belong in Metropolitan Home or House Beautiful?  

By the way, a tear down and glass box wouldn&#039;t be more appropriate to this location.  A glass box would force you to look at the neighborhood.  Westwood does have some outstanding and appropriate architecture, this is just not an example of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sam</p>
<p>What heritage would you be speaking of?  Westwood is a postwar development of tract homes.  They were ordinary middle class houses in their day, all  2 x 4&#8217;s and drywall and little else.  The only heritage was the G.I. Bill.  Over time and owing to their adjacency to Beverly Hills the values went through the roof.  However, the houses remain what they always were, cracker boxes.</p>
<p>The term McMansion does not speak to any particular architectural style beyond the fact that it is largely inappropriate for the place it is built and takes no consideration of the site.  Usually the term implies a structure which maximizes square footage on a too small lot.  The difference between a McMansion and a nice house has everything to do with proportion and appropriateness.  </p>
<p>Yes, I would agree that this is squarely an interior design and remodeling project.  Thus the question, which comes up ever more often here, why is it featured on Architecture Daily?  Perhaps these kinds of projects belong in Metropolitan Home or House Beautiful?  </p>
<p>By the way, a tear down and glass box wouldn&#8217;t be more appropriate to this location.  A glass box would force you to look at the neighborhood.  Westwood does have some outstanding and appropriate architecture, this is just not an example of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/#comment-36208</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23594#comment-36208</guid>
		<description>@ Terry Glen Philips:

Yeah, I kinda see your point. In any case, don&#039;t see this as a serious architectural project but a project in interior design.
On that note, I like the design that went into the interior. The materials used in the bathrooms are very nice, and the new fireplace and furnishings give the house a fresh and comfortable look. Also, the design implications in the shelves, ceiling, etc are done well and the owner will probably enjoy it. 

&#039;An overpriced forties tract house into yet another McMansion?&#039; 

Don&#039;t expect EVERYONE to demolish their house and then completely rebuild it with some impractical futuristic glass building.
I don&#039;t know, but to me, it doesn&#039;t really look like a &#039;McMansion&#039;; they did a really nice job of keeping the heritage while making the interior look pleasing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Terry Glen Philips:</p>
<p>Yeah, I kinda see your point. In any case, don&#8217;t see this as a serious architectural project but a project in interior design.<br />
On that note, I like the design that went into the interior. The materials used in the bathrooms are very nice, and the new fireplace and furnishings give the house a fresh and comfortable look. Also, the design implications in the shelves, ceiling, etc are done well and the owner will probably enjoy it. </p>
<p>&#8216;An overpriced forties tract house into yet another McMansion?&#8217; </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t expect EVERYONE to demolish their house and then completely rebuild it with some impractical futuristic glass building.<br />
I don&#8217;t know, but to me, it doesn&#8217;t really look like a &#8216;McMansion&#8217;; they did a really nice job of keeping the heritage while making the interior look pleasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Glenn Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/#comment-36172</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Glenn Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23594#comment-36172</guid>
		<description>Wow, what on Earth is going on around here?  What could possibly be considered meritorious about the transmogrification of an overpriced forties tract house into yet another McMansion?

What exactly are we meant to take away from this wilderness of exposed trusses other than a West Los Angeles fantasy of Aspen or Montana?  What does the room with the sheep ball represent?  Does the owner go there to meditate and imagine herself in times before she commissioned this monstrosity?  My favorite part is the tin can downlighting that festoons the ceiling and points straight ahead no matter what the angle of the ceiling.  Home Depot must have been having a sale.  

Sorry, but this is not a project of merit to be included in a blog with serious architectural pretensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what on Earth is going on around here?  What could possibly be considered meritorious about the transmogrification of an overpriced forties tract house into yet another McMansion?</p>
<p>What exactly are we meant to take away from this wilderness of exposed trusses other than a West Los Angeles fantasy of Aspen or Montana?  What does the room with the sheep ball represent?  Does the owner go there to meditate and imagine herself in times before she commissioned this monstrosity?  My favorite part is the tin can downlighting that festoons the ceiling and points straight ahead no matter what the angle of the ceiling.  Home Depot must have been having a sale.  </p>
<p>Sorry, but this is not a project of merit to be included in a blog with serious architectural pretensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/#comment-36163</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23594#comment-36163</guid>
		<description>I love the exposed structure and they did a really nice job of bringing in natural light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the exposed structure and they did a really nice job of bringing in natural light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/#comment-36159</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23594#comment-36159</guid>
		<description>Woops, I&#039;m sorry, 
Didn&#039;t take a good look, it&#039;s a redesign.
Nice redesign</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops, I&#8217;m sorry,<br />
Didn&#8217;t take a good look, it&#8217;s a redesign.<br />
Nice redesign</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23594/westwood-residence-chacol/#comment-36158</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23594#comment-36158</guid>
		<description>floor plan sucks

wood is nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>floor plan sucks</p>
<p>wood is nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
