<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multi-media Tower / Eric Owen Moss Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:33:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-69195</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-69195</guid>
		<description>The more I look at this form the more i like it. the building seems so simple and easy to slag off but there is so much within it. i would love to know what you all hate about it so much!

&quot;LUCAS GRAY&quot; A! you say that aesthetics play a large part of good architecture! 
were you wearing two eye patches when you were looking at EOM work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I look at this form the more i like it. the building seems so simple and easy to slag off but there is so much within it. i would love to know what you all hate about it so much!</p>
<p>&#8220;LUCAS GRAY&#8221; A! you say that aesthetics play a large part of good architecture!<br />
were you wearing two eye patches when you were looking at EOM work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juno</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34913</link>
		<dc:creator>juno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34913</guid>
		<description>80&#039;s...decon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>80&#8217;s&#8230;decon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DzetaB</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34900</link>
		<dc:creator>DzetaB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34900</guid>
		<description>Este proyecto tiene mucha entropía.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Este proyecto tiene mucha entropía.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34875</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34875</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t been blown away by any of his work either. This one in particular doesn&#039;t really appeal to me. I feel it is another design promoting complexity for complexity&#039;s sake. Not everything has to be deconstructionist and usually structures in this style tend to be rather ugly. I also believe that a big part of a good design is aesthetics - let the debate begin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been blown away by any of his work either. This one in particular doesn&#8217;t really appeal to me. I feel it is another design promoting complexity for complexity&#8217;s sake. Not everything has to be deconstructionist and usually structures in this style tend to be rather ugly. I also believe that a big part of a good design is aesthetics &#8211; let the debate begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fino</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34861</link>
		<dc:creator>Fino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34861</guid>
		<description>I am just not a fan of this Moss fellow. I can not find a  personal connection to any of his projects. He&#039;s like Eisenman times 5. 

that is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just not a fan of this Moss fellow. I can not find a  personal connection to any of his projects. He&#8217;s like Eisenman times 5. </p>
<p>that is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan S.</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34843</guid>
		<description>It think it is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It think it is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34831</guid>
		<description>I saw this in person.  It was a pretty cool ( expensive) monstrosity of steel construction.  Mainly, I was struck by how close a mostly steel edifice could be approved to be built so close to primary power lines!  They are like with in a few feet of this thing.  An earthquake could shake the line on to thing  rather easily..and as i said, its mostly made of steel.


That silly rendering is not doing the project justice.  you gotta see  it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this in person.  It was a pretty cool ( expensive) monstrosity of steel construction.  Mainly, I was struck by how close a mostly steel edifice could be approved to be built so close to primary power lines!  They are like with in a few feet of this thing.  An earthquake could shake the line on to thing  rather easily..and as i said, its mostly made of steel.</p>
<p>That silly rendering is not doing the project justice.  you gotta see  it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34733</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 02:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34733</guid>
		<description>It looks like a twisted Hedjucks&#039; Wall house</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a twisted Hedjucks&#8217; Wall house</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creator</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34296</link>
		<dc:creator>Creator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 07:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34296</guid>
		<description>Its smell like &quot;russian constructivism&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its smell like &#8220;russian constructivism&#8221; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdullah</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/23457/multi-media-towereric-owen-moss-architects/#comment-34285</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=23457#comment-34285</guid>
		<description>Nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
