Planetarium de Montreal / Saucier + Perrotte

By — Filed under: Awarded Competitions ,Museums and Libraries , ,
 

Canadian architects Saucier + Perrotte shared with us their finalist proposal for the Planetarium de Monteral competition, a black mantle connecting the different programatic pieces.

Architect’s description, credits and more images after the break:


Suspended between two worlds: on a large scale, that of the space and stars; and closer to Earth, that of man and matter, rises the future Planetarium. It transports us elsewhere and invites to discover a snapshot of Evolution, an allegory of the matter in shaping, of a state in evolution, from rough to precious. In a time rooted neither in the present nor the future, the matter in transformation, perforated and distorted is the symbol of this perpetual mutation.

Inspired by this matter, the entire project presents to its visitors the different states of the matter, and the transformations of the planets thereby take place in the heart of the tour. This matter allows the visitors to live an immersive, sensitive and emotional experience and, at the same time, to understand astronomical phenomena.

A sun if the earth of this galaxy: the Theatre no.1. The light which shines from it creates a signal from the Pierre De Coubertin Avenue, and in the heart of the project it leads the planning of the project. The public spaces of the Hall put the visitor in the heart of this system, immerse him in a world of discovery, contemplation and knowledge.

The matter, disconnected from the ground, creates the interior spaces and conceals all the technical and structural elements inside its thickness. It contains the Planetarium scenography system. Inside its upheaval, the matter reveals the main museological elements. The two theaters appear encrusted in the matter. Others small spherical elements are used to describe the spaces, give directions and gather people.

Designed in accordance with principles of sustainability, established in the heart of the touristic and scientific de Maisonneuve area, the Planetarium positions itself as a singular and particular architectural element. Conscious of the important part it has to play, it demonstrates respect in its relation with the other elements on-site such as the Biodome and the Olympic Stadium. It strategic position and its shape allow it to become a complementary signal in the qualification of this major museum area.

Architects: Saucier + Perrotte architectes
Location: Montreal, Quebec,
Design Architect: Gilles Saucier
Project Architect: André Perrotte
Project team: Olivier Krieger, Marie-Eve Primeau, Gregory Neudorf, Lia Ruccolo, Guillaume Sasseville, Yutaro Minagawa, Tomek Bartczak, David Moreaux, Etienne Hotte, Patrice Bégin
Consultants:
Arup/Consultants SM _ Daniel Brodkin, Brian Markham, Jacques Guertin, Thérèse Primiani, Richard Breault
Pageau Morel & ass. _
Jacques De Grâce, Roland Charneaux, Daniel Picard
Lyse Tremblay architecte
Jean-Marc Carpentier
Design Communication _
André Bilodeau, Jean-François Major
Trizart Alliance _
François Morrison, Pierre Lemieux, Marie Dupuis
Technorm _
Gaétan Frenette

 
 
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Paul says:

We also have it in France… since 1979 !!

Eglise Jeanne d’Arc, Rouen, France

http://www.mandrin45.com/joomla/images/domaine_public/photos/rouen/035.jpg

http://breizh.forever.free.fr/Images/Eglise%20Ste%20Jeanne%20d%27Arc.jpg

 
# May 26, 2009 at 08:14
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Emilie says:

c’est le batiment du premier plan le projet.
à l’arrière c’est la tour du stade olympique de Montreal qui date de 1976 http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_Stadium_(Montreal)

 
# May 26, 2009 at 08:59
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ph says:

low resolution blob

 
# May 26, 2009 at 09:07
Thumb up Thumb down 0
stan says:

paul are u serious? or just pretending…

 
# May 26, 2009 at 09:11
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Paul says:

It was our french touch ! :) nice project

 
# May 26, 2009 at 09:14
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Stone says:

What’s the tall object on the planetarium ?

 
# May 26, 2009 at 10:44
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Lucas Gray says:

I don’t think it is a tall object on the planetarium but rather the tower of the old olympic stadium in the background of the rendering.

I usually like Saucier + Perrotte’s work but am not impressed by this building at all. It seems clumsy and not well integrated into its surroundings. It is another in an endless line of complex geometric forms or blobs coming out of firms these days.

Many of their other buildings are grounded in culture, history and context and I would expect more from them than this black prism.

 
# May 26, 2009 at 11:06
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Lt says:

i agree with Lucas…
Saucier + Perrotte could have done so much better…

 
# May 26, 2009 at 17:34
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Katsudon says:

I’m becoming more and more a fan of S+P as they look to be constant in the quality of their work. Although the esthetic one doesn’t look as brilliant as the other works, it however seems to be quite well balanced regarding the program. Alway pleasant!

 
# May 27, 2009 at 03:43
Thumb up Thumb down 0
jeff says:

Interesting project! Also, I think that this area would need this kind of innovative and attractive project.

 
# May 27, 2009 at 08:42
Thumb up Thumb down 0
the arch photographer says:

This project, has not only been able to defend itself on LEAD requirements but it’s changing the iconography of the planetariums throughout the world. The beauty of a project does not only stand on what it looks like…It has to realize something new about how we visit this kind of project…And I think the programmation of S+P’s proposition is at the level of their reputation and meets those requirements. I guess that Lucas up here would of liked a good old fashioned boring box with a good old set of balls sticking out of it to reassure himself that he’s looking at a planetarium.

Wait till you see the one who won the competition, hopefully many people will not be in favor.
Till then, cheers to you all

 
# May 27, 2009 at 11:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0
john says:

If that is a building i’m a frog!

 
# May 27, 2009 at 18:06
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Laurent says:

so dark… i know we’re talking about space but if i were a kid, this severe cold black distorded box would frighten me…
anyways, very nice renderings altough not enough explicit for this phase of the competition. Plus, it’s like the building is standing in a forest : have you seen the site ?

 
# May 27, 2009 at 19:12
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Patrick Gomez says:

Eh John, so maybe you are a frog, and then the winner might be a cocroach.

 
# May 28, 2009 at 09:46
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Archangel says:

hey Arch photographer, spare us with your acid talk. The jury has decided your project was NOT the best so deal with it and digest your defeat in silence.

 
# May 28, 2009 at 10:43
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Bo Lucky says:

This building looks somewhat like a stealth aircraft. It will be hardly visible to radars.

 
# May 28, 2009 at 10:54
Thumb up Thumb down 0
the arch photographer says:

Hey Archangel, are your wings working allright or your eyes can’t read photographer….This is not my project. SO go and do your nervous dropping somewhere else.

 
# May 28, 2009 at 10:56
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Archangel says:

An angel doesn’t produce droppings… Altough i would make an exception if i was over your head. Anyway, your first post was insulting for another blogger and the winner of the competition. What kind of answer were you expecting ???

 
# May 28, 2009 at 11:20
Thumb up Thumb down 0
the arch photographer says:

Good enough, but why is it that the winners aren’t showing their images are they afraid to show what they presented to the jury…are they changing it so it right now can be more publishable, presentable for the public?

 
# May 28, 2009 at 11:32
Thumb up Thumb down 0
rg says:

Yes, good point, why can’t we see the other projects? you would imagine that the other designs should be presented for us to view.

 
# May 28, 2009 at 17:50
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Antoine says:

When a winning entry is not publish, this is a signal that they change the project… Why we don’t have other projects and the winner present ???? Very suspect…

 
# May 29, 2009 at 11:31
Thumb up Thumb down 0
The ARC says:

Surely Saucier’s ego was so defeated that he wanted to show off his project before every competitor…lol! It’s like if the Detroit Red Wings were defeated by the NY Islanders!

For my part I think that the two projection rooms look like two oversized token stolen from a game of Mastermind!

I really don’t think that it blends into the surronding building… no link with the Saputo Stadium… from outer space!

 
# May 31, 2009 at 13:17
Thumb up Thumb down 0
the student says:

Maybe he’s showing the defeated project just because even though Saucier+Perrotte lost, their defeated project is now getting published in pretty much all the design sites…And I’m sure magazines will want to publish it….Because whatever we say, They are still the best we have in the country and they have won the most prizes and are the most publishable firm internationally speaking.

I remember OMA use to publish their work even if at some time they were’nt winning anything at all. And look were they are now. Showing your work at all time makes you exist. And makes potential clients invite you to other competitions.

 
# May 31, 2009 at 13:30
Thumb up Thumb down 0
The ARC says:

A friend of mine working for one of the firms told me all the competitors signed a non-divulgation of the projects before the overall exhibit… is that right?

If so, Saucier either got big balls or he doesn’t have the control of his stuff!

 
# June 1, 2009 at 09:22
Thumb up Thumb down 0

The ARC,

Saucier+ Perrotte sent us this info directly.

 
# June 1, 2009 at 09:45
Thumb up Thumb down 0
observateur says:

The arc is right, don’t worry you’ll see the winning entry. Just after the city will make it official.

 
# June 2, 2009 at 10:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0

7:20 AM Apr 12th

http://bit.ly/ea917B – Project Of The Day

Leave a Reply »

 

Latest Comments »

Has archdaily started a new...[+]
I’ll add one, based on these comments: Architects are easily offended.[+]
Just something he learned from Rem Koolhaas, again and again...[+]
Why not try and improve the existing...[+]
What even is that lake room oval thing!!?? I still don’t know…[+]

Upcoming Architecture Events »

got events? invite us! click here

Architecture Books & Magazines »

Volume # 28: Internet of Things

Volume # 28: Internet of Things

This issue of Volume explores architects’ roles in the age of the internet. For us at ArchDaily, this is a topic we find very interesting. We ask all the architects we interview how the internet has changed their practice;…

 

Bolles+Wilson / A Handbook Of Productive Paradigms

01

“Established initially in London in 1980 and based in Germany since 1988 the architectural office of Bolles + Wilson has firmly established itself as an international practice underpinned by thorough research and theoretical discourse. This monograph chronicles a variety

 

Made to Measure: The Architecture of Leers Weinzapfel Associates

Made to Measure: The Architecture of Leers Weinzapfel Associates

Made to Measure is a monograph showcasing the work of Leers Weinzapfel Associates, an architecture firm based out of Boston, Massachusetts. Leers Weinzapfel Associates first gained prominence by taking on infrastructure projects that are often left to engineers. Where…

 

Our partners »

AD on iPad via Pulse

Browse by date »

Browse by category »

Friends »