<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Heart Center in Singapore / Broadway Malyan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:44:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: National Heart Center Architecture in Singapore / Broadway Malyan - HomeHouseDesign.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-68459</link>
		<dc:creator>National Heart Center Architecture in Singapore / Broadway Malyan - HomeHouseDesign.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-68459</guid>
		<description>[...] retail opportunities for users and create more space for operational efficiency for staff. [via] Sponsored [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] retail opportunities for users and create more space for operational efficiency for staff. [via] Sponsored [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhân thành</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-64147</link>
		<dc:creator>nhân thành</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-64147</guid>
		<description>mor picture for you idea :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mor picture for you idea :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-34890</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-34890</guid>
		<description>Nice concept. Especially the use of plants in the interior but there are parts of this project that are a little too chaotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice concept. Especially the use of plants in the interior but there are parts of this project that are a little too chaotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locu</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-34647</link>
		<dc:creator>Locu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 18:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-34647</guid>
		<description>I think the design facts are kinda distorted in Malyan&#039;s version..to begin with, the architectural and facade design and passive strategies are brainchild of Ong and Ong architects, based in Singapore. Broadway are the medical planners who are responsible for the functional aspects of the medical institution. This collaboration led to the winning scheme with the latter focusing solely on its functional aspects. Whilst much credit has been given to Malyan based on the design (which is supposed to be Ong and Ong), it appears that ethics are quite important and that you do not rob others of their creative works...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the design facts are kinda distorted in Malyan&#8217;s version..to begin with, the architectural and facade design and passive strategies are brainchild of Ong and Ong architects, based in Singapore. Broadway are the medical planners who are responsible for the functional aspects of the medical institution. This collaboration led to the winning scheme with the latter focusing solely on its functional aspects. Whilst much credit has been given to Malyan based on the design (which is supposed to be Ong and Ong), it appears that ethics are quite important and that you do not rob others of their creative works&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TENO</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-33505</link>
		<dc:creator>TENO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-33505</guid>
		<description>What a mess! Lots of funky gestures, but no apparent concept apart from &quot;let&#039;s add a lot of funky stuff we found in the magazines lying around the office&quot; to a box with some surface articulation. Singapore deserves better. Move on, nothing to see here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a mess! Lots of funky gestures, but no apparent concept apart from &#8220;let&#8217;s add a lot of funky stuff we found in the magazines lying around the office&#8221; to a box with some surface articulation. Singapore deserves better. Move on, nothing to see here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centro cardiovascular &#124; broadway malyan &#124; TOTONKO</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-33474</link>
		<dc:creator>centro cardiovascular &#124; broadway malyan &#124; TOTONKO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-33474</guid>
		<description>[...] vía [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vía [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 16:08:78</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-33348</link>
		<dc:creator>16:08:78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-33348</guid>
		<description>Funny thing.......background building  looks more interesting.....  shame on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing&#8230;&#8230;.background building  looks more interesting&#8230;..  shame on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rccrichton</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-33319</link>
		<dc:creator>rccrichton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-33319</guid>
		<description>balkan, you must be kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>balkan, you must be kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fino</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-33284</link>
		<dc:creator>Fino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-33284</guid>
		<description>Gosh. This project couldn&#039;t make up its mind, eh? Doesn&#039;t seem like there was a clear consensus of what to do or what to edit. Too many ideas made the cut, and the idea that seemed to have the most clarity, to be the most elegant, and was more carefully thought out........was restricted to the back. There are two completely different facades that have been smooshed together..........like Play-Doh. What happened? 

that is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh. This project couldn&#8217;t make up its mind, eh? Doesn&#8217;t seem like there was a clear consensus of what to do or what to edit. Too many ideas made the cut, and the idea that seemed to have the most clarity, to be the most elegant, and was more carefully thought out&#8230;&#8230;..was restricted to the back. There are two completely different facades that have been smooshed together&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.like Play-Doh. What happened? </p>
<p>that is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22981/national-heart-center-in-singapore-broadway-malyan/#comment-33262</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22981#comment-33262</guid>
		<description>I like the back facade better than the crazy folding lass on the front. The integral use of plants and internal gardens seems like a fantastic feature for a health facility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the back facade better than the crazy folding lass on the front. The integral use of plants and internal gardens seems like a fantastic feature for a health facility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
