<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Al Rostamini Headquarters / MAD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:04:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tito</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-47736</link>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-47736</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression the company was called Al Rostamani and not Rostamini....love the building just hope they get the company name right when they come to that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression the company was called Al Rostamani and not Rostamini&#8230;.love the building just hope they get the company name right when they come to that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARN</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-38861</link>
		<dc:creator>ARN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-38861</guid>
		<description>What hell is that?
Unrealistically , expensive structure, mixt of straws and emmental cheese?.
Just impressive, but no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What hell is that?<br />
Unrealistically , expensive structure, mixt of straws and emmental cheese?.<br />
Just impressive, but no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oficinas Al Rostamini en Dubai, diseñado por MAD arquitectos &#124; Concreto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-38586</link>
		<dc:creator>Oficinas Al Rostamini en Dubai, diseñado por MAD arquitectos &#124; Concreto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-38586</guid>
		<description>[...] Viste la web de MAD. Fuente Archdaily. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viste la web de MAD. Fuente Archdaily. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAG</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-37551</link>
		<dc:creator>HAG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 03:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-37551</guid>
		<description>Frederick, no personal problem, but..

im seeek about people like u, 
whiy we dont just stop do new things, take off the dust to the vitruvius book, and make agan classic architecture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frederick, no personal problem, but..</p>
<p>im seeek about people like u,<br />
whiy we dont just stop do new things, take off the dust to the vitruvius book, and make agan classic architecture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-37225</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-37225</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m missing something, but are those giant pedestrian shadows hanging out just beneath the building on the first rendering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing something, but are those giant pedestrian shadows hanging out just beneath the building on the first rendering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daiber</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-36850</link>
		<dc:creator>daiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-36850</guid>
		<description>the tubes could be used as slider so the arabs could have some fun.
Just imagine that while you are at work, to take the bus you go down a giant slider, that woulded be so nice.


the coment about Venturi was everything one can say.

let&#039;s not blame everything on architecture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the tubes could be used as slider so the arabs could have some fun.<br />
Just imagine that while you are at work, to take the bus you go down a giant slider, that woulded be so nice.</p>
<p>the coment about Venturi was everything one can say.</p>
<p>let&#8217;s not blame everything on architecture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan de Varona</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-36681</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan de Varona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-36681</guid>
		<description>where is the function in the form. Is it designed just to show that it was hard to design? Something different to be different? Its difinately unique, I think the organic shapes would serve better in an environment with hills or mountains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is the function in the form. Is it designed just to show that it was hard to design? Something different to be different? Its difinately unique, I think the organic shapes would serve better in an environment with hills or mountains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-36466</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-36466</guid>
		<description>Nice images,
Stupid idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice images,<br />
Stupid idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-36160</link>
		<dc:creator>maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-36160</guid>
		<description>cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/22680/al-rostamini-headquarters-mad/#comment-36136</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=22680#comment-36136</guid>
		<description>sad about that,

agree with Frederick, die now.

if this is the furture architecture , I dont know how to face it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sad about that,</p>
<p>agree with Frederick, die now.</p>
<p>if this is the furture architecture , I dont know how to face it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
