Comments on: Prada Transformer, Position 1: Fashion Exhibition

By: Curves 'Graph

Curves 'Graph — Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:47:17 +0000

Prada Transformer, Position 1: Fashion Exhibition | ArchDaily http://t.co/KeIDhJPv via @archdaily

By: Solyn

Solyn — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 03:04:57 +0000

DkOucr Good point. I hadn’t thought about it quite that way. :)

By: Marianna Patelida

Marianna Patelida — Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:24:26 +0000

Prada Transformer, Position 1: Fashion Exhibition | ArchDaily http://t.co/1oAJG4Y via @archdaily

By: ikkairi

ikkairi — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:12:50 +0000

Prada Transformer, Position 1: Fashion Exhibition | ArchDaily http://t.co/pOeE8m5 via @archdaily

By: Anna Raquel Serrano

Anna Raquel Serrano — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:22:14 +0000

@DiegoADuarte pois é, Diegoo.. Também babei horrores!! Tem um da Prada tb http://bit.ly/d6CrMq ele gira e abriga varias exposiçoes …

By: Nasim

Nasim — Thu, 13 May 2010 13:23:53 +0000

multifunctional building with minimum change.

By: Durban

Durban — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:37:46 +0000

Stone has summed it up perfectly! haha, well done.

By: Airbrush Makeup

Airbrush Makeup — Tue, 26 May 2009 09:41:51 +0000

O really a great way of enjoyment.. as it seems very beautiful building so a birds eye view can give a sense of relaxation to everyone.

By: Stone

Stone — Wed, 20 May 2009 08:04:37 +0000

Although it dose not have a beautiful aspect,it contains many things.

By: Judit Bellostes : juego de dados - prada transformer pavilion , Estudio de arquitectura

Thu, 14 May 2009 18:47:21 +0000

[...] Prada transformer – OMA (artículo de texto con fotografías, en flash) + Prada transformer – ArchDaily (artículo de texto con fotografías del pabellón acabado y del proyecto) + Prada transformer – [...]

By: Drunkmuse

Drunkmuse — Wed, 13 May 2009 17:23:31 +0000

CP my dear…..” I know Archigram, Archigram “is” a good friend of mine. This disaster CP,….AIN’T NO FRIGGIN ARCHIGRAM!!”

By: francis

francis — Wed, 13 May 2009 17:02:29 +0000

… and “flip” will inevitably be followed by “flop”. Ok ok, I’m outta here!!

By: francis

francis — Wed, 13 May 2009 16:58:39 +0000

Oh … and if you’ve been following the politics in the “United Kingdom”, “flipping” or “flip” is not a very popular word at the moment.

By: francis

francis — Wed, 13 May 2009 16:47:17 +0000

Yeap, fashion and architecture – may their paths never cross again, ever! zach’s statement is right on the nose and it made me chuckle too. Cheers for that. Precisely what the phat-chick said when looked in the mirror, “no fancy shapes, no wind dia……, result!”

By: bugzzz

bugzzz — Wed, 13 May 2009 14:55:04 +0000

is it just me or is there not a single comment about where this frickin thing is located?

By: davvid

davvid — Tue, 12 May 2009 18:34:58 +0000

I think this building challenges a lot of what is being digested by architectures students today. It is a very surprising and exciting design because it refuses the familiar ways of addressing obsessions with craft/material, balance, purity or tension.

By: Otro

Otro — Tue, 12 May 2009 13:23:22 +0000

…probably Venturi´d love it

By: freddy wolf

freddy wolf — Tue, 12 May 2009 08:51:37 +0000

The world would be boring: – if we couldn’t complain.
if everyone would have the same ideas.
The world would be boring if everything would be alike.

By: CP

CP — Tue, 12 May 2009 08:22:11 +0000

I love it. It’s better than all the installation drivel that seems to go on so much these days by those claiming to be architects and which never is able to get translated into actual architecture. Bravo for actually realizing a concept and actually positing it in actual architectural parameters rather than some pretty renderings. Where has the architectural avant-garde gone? Why is the safety of the status quo so vehemently defended now? I think Archigram would be really excited by this. I know I am.

By: hannah

hannah — Tue, 12 May 2009 05:06:21 +0000

Been inside.
Prada waist down exhibition?
Nice.
Rem’s transformer?
Not so nice.

A little dirty on the inside
badly done detailing
nothing special
just some rubbery material
over structure.

and wot…like it takes
4 cranes and 3 weeks to
“transform”???

Pls Rem next time you
design something for Seoul
try a little harder
(same disappointment as the Leeum Museum)