Support on the -- Click here to nominate us for Best Online Magazine!Close
Follow us on twitter! twitter.com/archdaily

Prada Transformer, Position 1: Fashion Exhibition

By David Basulto — Filed under: Art , Featured , Structures , , , ,
 


© Iwan Baan

Rem Koolhaas’ latest project -The Prada Transformer- is not just a building, but also a statement on today´s state of architecture. Dubbed the anti-blob, this “object” rejects all common blobby shapes we have seen lately. Simple geometrical shapes (a circle, a cross, a rectangle and an hexagon) enclose a space that depending on its rotation results on different spaces suitable for fashion exhibitions, cinema, art exhibitions and other special events. Each face is the platform on which these activities take place, while also being served by the other faces enclosing the space.


© Iwan Baan

A few weeks ago we showed you part of the construction progress, which is already finished and opened in April 15th with a fashion exhibition (Waist Down – Skirts by Miuccia Prada, see video of animated skirts at the exhibition), that will be opened until May 31 when the Transformer will rotate into Cinema mode.

Architecture photographer Iwan Baan recently visited the Prada Transformer and shared with us this impressive photo set of the Transformer on Exhibition mode (see more after the break).

For me, search for the ultimate flexible space and the use of regular shapes puts several things in question. Transformable architecture is nothing new, but in times on which “mixed use” seems to be the 2nd typical characteristic of a building after “green”, this project makes a stand. No fancy shapes, no wind diagrams, no fancy structure, no shiny surfaces, no eye candy renderings. No blob. Just, a simple building.

FASHION EXHIBITION

April 25th – May 31st: Waist Down – Skirts by Miuccia Prada. Exhibition showcasing a collection of skirts, ranging from the first-ever Prada show to recent ones.

CINEMA

June 26th – July 5th: Flesh, Mind and Soul. Film festival co-curated by Alejandro González Iñárritu (director Babel, 21 Grams).

ART EXHIBITION

July 30th – August 20th: Beyond Control. Exhibition by the Prada Foundation.

SPECIAL EVENT

September 8th – Fashion Event, the final flip of the Transformer.

© Iwan Baan
© Iwan Baan
© Iwan Baan
© Iwan Baan
© Iwan Baan
© Iwan Baan
© Iwan Baan
© Iwan Baan

 

30 comments »

Jon says:

Ahhhhh yes yes .. it’s still a f’ing blob.

 
# May 10, 2009 at 20:34
Terry Glenn Phipps says:

This takes the biscuit as the single most ridiculous starchitect ego-mess built to date. Such breathtaking hubris cannot fail to invoke nemesis.

Earlier this evening I was looking at Francois de Menil’s website and thinking of the wonder an inspiration of the profession at art of architecture when approached with humility and attention to scale, form, and materials. It is reassuring to know that there are still people out there in the world making something that isn’t, well isn’t this Prada transformer nonsense.

Terry Glenn Phipps

 
# May 10, 2009 at 21:05
Hermes says:

Not even Iwan Baan’s superb photography could save this building from becoming oblivious.

 
# May 10, 2009 at 21:21
A. Court says:

C R A P

 
# May 10, 2009 at 23:06
thiago says:

again, he doesn’t need to do this…
but I liked more than the renderings… I must confess that I’m kind of jealous, I really want to see this building working..

 
# May 11, 2009 at 00:06
DCV says:

Love it. It’s such a statement

 
# May 11, 2009 at 01:21
neutra says:

please, somebody stop this man
Rem please, be a journalist and live happy

 
# May 11, 2009 at 01:40
SYD08 says:

This building is pretty far out there conceptually but I think it’s great due to that it’s an exhibition and the program is more flexible. I apprectiate that he comes up with these progressive ideas and get’s them built.

 
# May 11, 2009 at 01:50
_m says:

well I dont know..
even on “great pictures” it looks pretty weird
or maybe it’s an aim… ceating something so unpleasant to attract attention..than definitely well done :[

 
# May 11, 2009 at 03:30
j says:

would it KILL iwan baan to provide us with slightly bigger photos? ffs, it’s killing my eyes to get a closer look at some of the details…

 
# May 11, 2009 at 06:35
davvid says:

I really love this building. Its like a dream. Amazing.

 
# May 11, 2009 at 10:36
mn x says:

all you doubters and haters out there…

…bite me

 
# May 11, 2009 at 11:17
Drunkmuse says:

This Pavillion once again, is the perfect answer to a question that nobody asked!

Go write another friggin book Rem!. At least the nuances and insights contained on the pages are funnier.I am actually waiting for your next publishing; however, not your buildings.

 
# May 11, 2009 at 11:55
ala says:

Very creative. Love it.

That pleases some one who is tired of generic show room of vertical gypsum walls. And the space inside is simply, naturally lit, and the visual aspect of the space is the one you have never seen before. Which means original creation of the designer.

For those of you who love his delirious new york, I find not so much value in his book although I could find so much value in his buildings. I read the book twice trying to see what is there inside. Then I began to believe that some people are just echoing what other people are saying, just like some professors do. I haven’t heard my colleagues or some professor say the delirious new york is not so much of a great book. Are we just afraid to go against the trend?

 
# May 11, 2009 at 23:08
zach says:

I really liked Rem’s work at IIT in Chicago but this is simply a DISASTER. I don’t know what to think. It reminds me of a fat chick wearing something slutty. You really don’t want to look but you have to. And then you regret it…..deeply.

 
# May 11, 2009 at 23:32
hannah says:

Been inside.
Prada waist down exhibition?
Nice.
Rem’s transformer?
Not so nice.

A little dirty on the inside
badly done detailing
nothing special
just some rubbery material
over structure.

and wot…like it takes
4 cranes and 3 weeks to
“transform”???

Pls Rem next time you
design something for Seoul
try a little harder
(same disappointment as the Leeum Museum)

 
# May 12, 2009 at 00:06
CP says:

I love it. It’s better than all the installation drivel that seems to go on so much these days by those claiming to be architects and which never is able to get translated into actual architecture. Bravo for actually realizing a concept and actually positing it in actual architectural parameters rather than some pretty renderings. Where has the architectural avant-garde gone? Why is the safety of the status quo so vehemently defended now? I think Archigram would be really excited by this. I know I am.

 
# May 12, 2009 at 03:22
freddy wolf says:

The world would be boring: – if we couldn’t complain.
if everyone would have the same ideas.
The world would be boring if everything would be alike.

 
# May 12, 2009 at 03:51
Otro says:

…probably Venturi´d love it

 
# May 12, 2009 at 08:23
davvid says:

I think this building challenges a lot of what is being digested by architectures students today. It is a very surprising and exciting design because it refuses the familiar ways of addressing obsessions with craft/material, balance, purity or tension.

 
# May 12, 2009 at 13:34
bugzzz says:

is it just me or is there not a single comment about where this frickin thing is located?

 
# May 13, 2009 at 09:55
francis says:

Yeap, fashion and architecture – may their paths never cross again, ever! zach’s statement is right on the nose and it made me chuckle too. Cheers for that. Precisely what the phat-chick said when looked in the mirror, “no fancy shapes, no wind dia……, result!”

 
# May 13, 2009 at 11:47
francis says:

Oh … and if you’ve been following the politics in the “United Kingdom”, “flipping” or “flip” is not a very popular word at the moment.

 
# May 13, 2009 at 11:58
francis says:

… and “flip” will inevitably be followed by “flop”. Ok ok, I’m outta here!!

 
# May 13, 2009 at 12:02
Drunkmuse says:

CP my dear…..” I know Archigram, Archigram “is” a good friend of mine. This disaster CP,….AIN’T NO FRIGGIN ARCHIGRAM!!”

 
# May 13, 2009 at 12:23
Stone says:

Although it dose not have a beautiful aspect,it contains many things.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 03:04

O really a great way of enjoyment.. as it seems very beautiful building so a birds eye view can give a sense of relaxation to everyone.

 
# May 26, 2009 at 04:41
Durban says:

Stone has summed it up perfectly! haha, well done.

 
# June 17, 2009 at 07:37

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

thank god. finally someone is focusing...[+]
fantastic[+]
Looks like a squid.[+]
sigh. projects like this make me question why i’m...[+]
Absolutely horrendous.[+]
maybe it always has been ! just more out there now[+]
thats how everything seems to be nowadays. I think...[+]
I agree with you, there is much to like about...[+]
I find it really curious that critique has become so...[+]
Great! What are the dimensions of each floor? No...[+]
construction detail 1:10?[+]
any possibility of seeing some wall construction...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »