Incremental Housing Strategy in India / Filipe Balestra & Sara Göransson
Aerial collage: the new archipelago of incremented kaccha houses rising from a context of well built permanent homes in a typical slum.
The problem with social housing has been how to give the most with less money. We have very good examples in Europe, but the constrains are way different than the ones in developing countries. In these countries, almost all the constructions are done by anyone but architects. Clearly, in these countries architects can do something way better than just designing or constructing, developing strategies together with communities to achieve housing solutions that not only address today´s necessities, but that can also be extended over time as families grow, once again by themselves and without architects.
A good example on this is Elemental, lead by Alejandro Aravena, which has been changing not only design aspects of social housing, but also public policy. Currently, they have built and on going projects in Chile, Mexico and more countries.
But also, there´s the work that Filipe Balestra and Sara Göransson have been doing in India, invited by Sheela Patel and Jockin Arputham from SPARC to develop an Incremental Housing Strategy that could be implemented anywhere.
Both Filipe and Sara had a very interesting background for this kind of project: Filipe had previously designed and built a school and community centre in Rocinha, Rio de Janeiro’s largest slum, in a participatory design and construction process tother with the locals. The project was called Sambarchitecture and it was documented as a movie which was shown in Cinema Zita during Brazilian Film Festival in Stockholm. Sambarchitecture was also in exhibition in the Architecture Museum of Stockholm and in the Botkyrka Konsthall; Sara has been working on a strategy to connect Stockholm, framing the future urban development as urban bridges between segregated suburbs.

Informal office in Koregaon Park, Pune.
Design team:
Filipe Balestra
Sara Göransson
Guilherme de Bivar
Martinho Pitta
Rafael Balestra
Remy Turquin
Carolina Cantante
With SPARC and Mahila Milan
Soon after Filipe and Sara arrived to Bombay, a team of international architects, urban planners, landscape architects and graphic designers volunteered to set up the strategy which uses the existing urban formations as starting point for development. Organic patterns that have evolved during time are preserved and existing social networks are respected. Neighbors remain neighbors, local remains local.
The following pictures show the life inside of old temporary houses (kaccha). All photos were taken in Netaji Nagar, Pune, India in 2009.
When Filipe and Sara started working they did not know the Indian government would initiate a grant of 4500 euro/ family for the incrementation of their homes at a national scale. The grant is now active and it can be given to any family who lives in a kaccha – an old temporary structure, not suitable for living. It is called City In-Situ Rehabilitation Scheme for Urban Poor Staying in Slums in City of Pune Under BSUP, JNNURM. The strategy strengthens the informal and aims to accelerate the legalization of the homes of the urban poor. Their strategy was arranged to fit the parameters of this grant.
All proposals are for one family and 270 sq foot area (grant regulations). Also, each house will have a new individual toilet and kitchen. The existing houses do not have neither toilets nor kitchens. The government will provide new infrastructure which will be brought into every house.

Implementation collage: kaccha houses incremented and customized

Mixed cluster featuring houses: C-A-C-B-C-A. Families will share walls, columns beams and infrastructure.
All prototypes need the participation of the community to emerge. The rules of the grant say each family has to contribute with 10% of the total max 4500 euro that the house costs. Since some families are not ready to give that amount so we are working on alternatives ways to contribute, i.e. sweat contribution: after the reinforced concrete structure is up, the families can help placing windows, doors, painting the house the color they want, and placing their own floor tiles. Thus, the families end up owning the process by customizing their homes.

Workshop in Netaji Nagar, Yerawada, Pune

Far left: Savita Sonawane from the Community Based Organization Mahila Milan, explaining strategy to slum dwellers of Netaji Nagar. Far right, Filipe Balestra sketching possibilities.
The pilot project will be implemented in Pune, India. Filipe, Sara and SPARC are now spreading the word to implement the strategy in other countries with similar needs: Brazil, Kenya, South Africa, The Philippines – the list is long – 1/3 of the world’s urban population is now living in slums.
Each family is free to choose one of the 3 incremental prototypes:
House A: a 2 story house structured as a 3 story house, allowing the owner to extend the house vertically without structural risks in the future.
House B: a 2 story house on pilots, allowing for the owner to either leave the space open for parking or to increment it as a shop or an extra bedroom.
House C: a 3 story house with a void in the middle. This void can be used like a veranda, living or working space, and the family can close it in order to create a new bedroom in the future.






























20 comments »
this is awesome. i have always wanted to do something like this! very inspirational / insightful
Good work i am greatly impressed :)
Corbusier all over again….
Great research and analysis of the current condition. Enjoyed the fact that the studio was not thousands of miles away from the site, but right in the heart of it, allowing the designers to really get into the project. In the end, the final product works well with its context.
Amazing project, I love efforts like these in which people get involved with the community to develop housing that accomodates their needs. As the presentaton to this project reads, in developing nations architects need to take on roles other than that of the designer of housing for which the public has neither the money to pay them for, nor the habit or custom to seek the architect to realize their housing needs, so assuming the role Aravena, Goransson and Balastra have taken on here is a great idea.
The idea behind this project is basically the same as the one behind that project Aravena developed in Chile, where the most novel idea to me was the possibility on behalf of the customer to customize their homes.
Awesome!
There’s been some interesting debate on this over on Dezeen:
http://www.dezeen.com/2009/05/05/incremental-housing-strategy-by-filipe-balestra-and-sara-goransson/#comments
wonderful project. can’t wait to see these buildings materialize. :) thanks archdaily!!!
Oh my, this is not Corbusier all over again. It seems to me to be far from it. Get past the isometric drawing, the formal isolated object, looking like Dom-i-no and think more about the civic strategy behind the project.
If anything it’s more ideologically like Corbusier’s former students, Candillis, Josic, and Shadrach Woods more sensitive ideas for residential development in Algerian and Moroccan cities that learned from the self organizations of existing villages. However this seems to go a little further in shedding the idea of controlling or master-planning as a necessary component of new development in these neighborhoods.
In that sense, it’s far more interesting and it couldn’t be farther from Corbusier.
(student)question: (to understand where we going with architecture for poor)
will height not be a problem in cost of construction? higher buildings are normally more costly or am i wrong?
is the allowance enough to let the user grow the house as he pleases? it seems he can only grow on way either up or down or middle…
it is important to develop such projects but it is important as well to understand the human characters of the users and those are not explained in this page.
Kudos and good luck to people that help to improve the lives of those in suffering. More power to tearing down the bureaucracy and getting the help to people that need it most – urgently! This project should be publish everywhere and everyone should play their part in raising awareness.
First of all I want to congratulate the team for taking the efforts that a very few Indian architects have taken(Laurie Baker, B.V.Doshi and Correa to name a few). But as some comment above has said I am sure that the humane side of the story is still missing. In the effort to fit in to the constraints of space and requirements of the grant we seem to forget the humane side of architecture. Being an Indian and living just 120kms from Pune I would be very eager to help you guys if wanted. I would suggest that a study of use of local materials and uses of cost effective building techniques might lead in acheiving a lower cost. The old city of Pune also has a very dense development, may be one can study the way these old settlements dealt with density and climate and find an appropriate solution. I am also interested to know how we are going to address the issues of community spaces or open spaces which I feel are a necessity in such developments( May be in such a dense settlement one can propose to cennect a few terraces together). well, good luck and I hope you enjoy….its a great begining indeed.
This solution does not address urban design issues. Civic anenities, sanitation, transport, green areas, microclimate and many other issues like security, energy etc. are overlooked. I would be more convinced if services were integrated into the architectural solution offered.
In short this is a rather simplistic solution to a very serious problem of housing for urban poor in India. the growth of slums has to do a lot with 1. Economics and 2. security. Main reasons for migrants clubbing together in urban villages. If law and order along with transport could be improved most of these clusters can be relocated/ decongested, thereby improving the quality of life for everyone.
They took the ideia from this icon, i’m sure
It’s a good start. However lot’s to be done. improvisation would always be necessary from block to block. However scope for power saving should be kept in mind when floors keep on rising. the floor below need more lighting and ventilation load.
keep up the good work.
POVERTY PORN – ! All we need is for western architects to put into words and theories the actions of others, add colours and publish a book/paper…….where would we be without you guys?
TOTALLY agree with G sarin
sham realness!
Links to this article »