<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dakota Residences / PB Elemental Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:40:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-30182</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-30182</guid>
		<description>notahater, sorry you work at pb but you don&#039;t have to take it personally...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>notahater, sorry you work at pb but you don&#8217;t have to take it personally&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notahater</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-30163</link>
		<dc:creator>notahater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-30163</guid>
		<description>what a bunch of haters commenting on this site. lets see your work that makes it on these kinds of sites. grow up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a bunch of haters commenting on this site. lets see your work that makes it on these kinds of sites. grow up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lasse</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-29753</link>
		<dc:creator>Lasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-29753</guid>
		<description>Why is this project in selected?fgtftysudedcdc kn x rkuxxn 
sorry, dosed off from boredom and my head hit the keys.... (intellegent crit for intellegent projects)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this project in selected?fgtftysudedcdc kn x rkuxxn<br />
sorry, dosed off from boredom and my head hit the keys&#8230;. (intellegent crit for intellegent projects)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dariusz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-29602</link>
		<dc:creator>dariusz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-29602</guid>
		<description>photographs are a bit too HRD.. Hopefully get some shadows in there or make it look realistic next time.. it&#039;s just too much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>photographs are a bit too HRD.. Hopefully get some shadows in there or make it look realistic next time.. it&#8217;s just too much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Glenn Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-29553</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Glenn Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-29553</guid>
		<description>There is nothing really wrong with this architecture, especially given that it is intended for a midlevel budget.  However, it does lack the purpose and clarity of other architectural expressions that are aimed at this budget area.  Thinking about that in terms of FLW&#039;s Usonian buildings (now 60 years ago) you see that much more can be accomplished with much less.  There is nothing particularly good about this project either.

The one detail that bugs me tremendously is this external tube running down the back of the building.  What is up with that?

Terry Glenn Phipps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing really wrong with this architecture, especially given that it is intended for a midlevel budget.  However, it does lack the purpose and clarity of other architectural expressions that are aimed at this budget area.  Thinking about that in terms of FLW&#8217;s Usonian buildings (now 60 years ago) you see that much more can be accomplished with much less.  There is nothing particularly good about this project either.</p>
<p>The one detail that bugs me tremendously is this external tube running down the back of the building.  What is up with that?</p>
<p>Terry Glenn Phipps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fino</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-29537</link>
		<dc:creator>Fino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-29537</guid>
		<description>Bo Lucky:

 I mean, the interior is decent, but I didn&#039;t say I was in love with it. This project was most likely heavily driven by a typical developer by cutting corners and purposefully lacking an attention to good detailing. I saw the interior as the only thing going for this project.....in order to sell.
But I agree.....it&#039;s not all that hot.

that is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bo Lucky:</p>
<p> I mean, the interior is decent, but I didn&#8217;t say I was in love with it. This project was most likely heavily driven by a typical developer by cutting corners and purposefully lacking an attention to good detailing. I saw the interior as the only thing going for this project&#8230;..in order to sell.<br />
But I agree&#8230;..it&#8217;s not all that hot.</p>
<p>that is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jung</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-29497</link>
		<dc:creator>Jung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-29497</guid>
		<description>I am an architect in Seattle as well and am really inspired by Pb&#039;s work. To answer Lucky, code does not allow access in the manner you describe. The window in the bathroom cooment I assume that is a shear wall so no penetration would be allowed. I like their work because unlike 99% of what is on this site they are showing modern can be brought to the masses, instead of million dollar homes (which have million dollar details) they create homes below $200 a sqft which is almost impossible in Seattle. I agree I would love to see some of the details from other projects but I know they are not affordable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an architect in Seattle as well and am really inspired by Pb&#8217;s work. To answer Lucky, code does not allow access in the manner you describe. The window in the bathroom cooment I assume that is a shear wall so no penetration would be allowed. I like their work because unlike 99% of what is on this site they are showing modern can be brought to the masses, instead of million dollar homes (which have million dollar details) they create homes below $200 a sqft which is almost impossible in Seattle. I agree I would love to see some of the details from other projects but I know they are not affordable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viniruski</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-29484</link>
		<dc:creator>viniruski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-29484</guid>
		<description>The symmetry torments me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The symmetry torments me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ES</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-29481</link>
		<dc:creator>ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-29481</guid>
		<description>Nothing new. Yawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing new. Yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21399/dakota-residences-pb-elemental-architecture/#comment-29446</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21399#comment-29446</guid>
		<description>I dont know about this project. There&#039;s nothing really interesting and unique about it. I&#039;ve seen this type of work numerous times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know about this project. There&#8217;s nothing really interesting and unique about it. I&#8217;ve seen this type of work numerous times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
