Comments on: Kaufhauskanal Metrozone / BIG + Topotek1

By: Tosh

Tosh — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:56:40 +0000

Try to imagine what it is to be in one of these buildings ;) that’s the only comment.. it’s easy to shape cities like that if you don’t have to live in these buildings.. or work in them.. because they thought about the space outside (though not enough) but they really don’t care about these buildings.. the way they just put some sort of repetitive window lines on them – making them like zebras or any other animal- does not show thoughtfullness..

By: Martin Hemmer

Martin Hemmer — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:12:16 +0000

I found your blog by chance . but i have to say that it’s great blog very useful information and very interesting subjects just greetings and good luck
i’m not going i will be always checking for updates.by the way Graz is a very lovely city I enjoyed it so much.

By: Joel

Joel — Fri, 15 May 2009 19:07:04 +0000

Bjark, or how to turn from hype to boring

By: roy

roy — Tue, 12 May 2009 12:52:56 +0000

Vladimir Konovalov says:May 6th, 2009 I like the fresh air that this project brings to the site.
I think so…
It`s so comfortable i feel…

By: Kaufhauskanal Metrozone by BIG and Topotek1 @ Dailytonic

Kaufhauskanal Metrozone by BIG and Topotek1 @ Dailytonic — Fri, 08 May 2009 12:17:46 +0000

[...] more info at ArchDaily [...]

By: 2Sense

2Sense — Fri, 08 May 2009 12:15:03 +0000

This project is forgetting for whom we are creating these spaces. Its all about the spaces, be it direct or indirect space creation. If the Human Soul refuses to be to occupy this space then we have created a Dead Space. I find these spaces cold….leaning toward the dead.

By: Mr. Cheap

Mr. Cheap — Fri, 08 May 2009 00:30:01 +0000

Hehe, Bjarke Ingels defines modernism : “Our Kaufhauskanal vision proposes a neighbourhood where you can have both – both city and nature, both open and urban, both history and future, both identity and diversity, both work and play.”

By: ol

ol — Thu, 07 May 2009 19:35:26 +0000

look at this: http://www.tessinskiy.ru/

By: archaalto

archaalto — Thu, 07 May 2009 17:35:38 +0000

since this project could potentially be sponsored by local government, the schemes naturally do not have as much “variety” that everyone seems to be detesting. but there is something to discuss here regarding the design which appears to address an economy of means. the hyper-rational solutions of sun, public space, and noise reduction result in the subtly varying forms & one construction type. this seems like a very minimal approach which says: “tread as lightly as possible”, and the people can fill in the rest.

why should every architectural project have the artist’s stamp on it?

this proposal could definitely use some more exploration of the ground plane in the residential units, but other than that it is a solid critique on how people can live in the city.

By: George

George — Thu, 07 May 2009 17:27:54 +0000

I believe I am seeing some HDR effects on those street level model shots – that’s a nice touch…