<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Docks de Paris / Jakob + MacFarlane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiKe Mecanics</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-62097</link>
		<dc:creator>MiKe Mecanics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-62097</guid>
		<description>Well Robert Stern?? Are u Nuts???

The problem of the building is the Main structure is too much robert stern! The plastic shape, looks really great, the problem is to be too much Facade, and that idea don&#039;t be continue all over the building...but it is easy explained because the fact, it&#039;s a restore, and the old structure is used to control the costs.  
But, without being any kind of masterpiece it&#039;s is for sure a great building, and for who, you said that it is &quot;one more bad building by the Seine&quot;, I can&#039;t stop thinking what river got better on his edges? In a Distance from here of two Km you got the Library of France of Perrault, in the other side the house of cinema of Frank Gehry, ...and you got also the faculty of architecture of Frederic Borel, and the Institute of Arabian World of Nouvel...saying just the most relevant..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Robert Stern?? Are u Nuts???</p>
<p>The problem of the building is the Main structure is too much robert stern! The plastic shape, looks really great, the problem is to be too much Facade, and that idea don&#8217;t be continue all over the building&#8230;but it is easy explained because the fact, it&#8217;s a restore, and the old structure is used to control the costs.<br />
But, without being any kind of masterpiece it&#8217;s is for sure a great building, and for who, you said that it is &#8220;one more bad building by the Seine&#8221;, I can&#8217;t stop thinking what river got better on his edges? In a Distance from here of two Km you got the Library of France of Perrault, in the other side the house of cinema of Frank Gehry, &#8230;and you got also the faculty of architecture of Frederic Borel, and the Institute of Arabian World of Nouvel&#8230;saying just the most relevant..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crcc</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-62078</link>
		<dc:creator>crcc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-62078</guid>
		<description>of course not! Why not to do something more related to reality? something simple and good? keep me asking: what to say if i have to show this kind of things to the students?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course not! Why not to do something more related to reality? something simple and good? keep me asking: what to say if i have to show this kind of things to the students?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-29426</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-29426</guid>
		<description>i think robert stern is atrocious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think robert stern is atrocious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-29425</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-29425</guid>
		<description>i was being sarcastic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was being sarcastic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sullka</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-29423</link>
		<dc:creator>sullka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-29423</guid>
		<description>Stan, I hear you about wanting to live in the future, but we sure shouldn&#039;t be living in the past either, so not...we don&#039;t want more classicists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan, I hear you about wanting to live in the future, but we sure shouldn&#8217;t be living in the past either, so not&#8230;we don&#8217;t want more classicists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VisualBloc.com # On with the show! &#187; Docks de Paris / Jakob + MacFarlane</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-29087</link>
		<dc:creator>VisualBloc.com # On with the show! &#187; Docks de Paris / Jakob + MacFarlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-29087</guid>
		<description>[...] Found on http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Found on <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ultra man</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-29009</link>
		<dc:creator>Ultra man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-29009</guid>
		<description>The problem is not the style of the building, but the architect. Jakob + MacFarlane are not known for doing great big project, they are better at interior design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is not the style of the building, but the architect. Jakob + MacFarlane are not known for doing great big project, they are better at interior design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo Lucky</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28565</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28565</guid>
		<description>Why to build simple if we can make things complicated? Why common and usual if we can do strange? Well... architect can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why to build simple if we can make things complicated? Why common and usual if we can do strange? Well&#8230; architect can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28558</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28558</guid>
		<description>why cant we have more robert stern buildings. what&#039;s wrong with people? they want to live in the future or something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why cant we have more robert stern buildings. what&#8217;s wrong with people? they want to live in the future or something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28449</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 08:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28449</guid>
		<description>Nice..for the city. 
 The interiors....mmmmmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice..for the city.<br />
 The interiors&#8230;.mmmmmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fidel</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28447</link>
		<dc:creator>Fidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 08:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28447</guid>
		<description>It looks like crap in reallity. Bad details, unresolved corners, this building will look very dated in two years, one more bad building by the Seine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like crap in reallity. Bad details, unresolved corners, this building will look very dated in two years, one more bad building by the Seine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranjuic</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28369</link>
		<dc:creator>oranjuic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28369</guid>
		<description>i recall seeing this project in an architecture picture book. the images are always nicer than the built structure, thats the problem with architecture today. offices celebrate their ideas via renderings that dont simulate the same effect when materialized, they are more static. my concern here is that the shape serves no purpose other than purely aesthetics, cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i recall seeing this project in an architecture picture book. the images are always nicer than the built structure, thats the problem with architecture today. offices celebrate their ideas via renderings that dont simulate the same effect when materialized, they are more static. my concern here is that the shape serves no purpose other than purely aesthetics, cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kk</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28186</link>
		<dc:creator>kk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 02:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28186</guid>
		<description>this building = epic fail
i used to like this when i started studying and got into funky shaped architecture, this looked great in books, but just hasnt panned out in reality</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this building = epic fail<br />
i used to like this when i started studying and got into funky shaped architecture, this looked great in books, but just hasnt panned out in reality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28183</link>
		<dc:creator>damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 01:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28183</guid>
		<description>i kind feel the so-called &#039;pedestrian tube&#039; a mimic of Pompidou escalator?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i kind feel the so-called &#8216;pedestrian tube&#8217; a mimic of Pompidou escalator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28129</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28129</guid>
		<description>I kind of like it - although I can&#039;t really explain why. I also think it will look rather dated and out of fashion in a couple years. So, I guess I am sort of torn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of like it &#8211; although I can&#8217;t really explain why. I also think it will look rather dated and out of fashion in a couple years. So, I guess I am sort of torn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EventParis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-172232</link>
		<dc:creator>EventParis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-172232</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Docks de Paris / Jakob + MacFarlane &#124; Arch Daily http://tinyurl.com/d8fdw6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Docks de Paris / Jakob + MacFarlane | Arch Daily <a href="http://tinyurl.com/d8fdw6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/d8fdw6</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiramisu</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28090</link>
		<dc:creator>tiramisu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28090</guid>
		<description>I think he means it looked better on paper :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he means it looked better on paper :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roadkill</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28080</link>
		<dc:creator>roadkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 17:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28080</guid>
		<description>I thought the idea was to build it? so what are you trying to say, that the final result was never the idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the idea was to build it? so what are you trying to say, that the final result was never the idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiKe Mecanics</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-28078</link>
		<dc:creator>MiKe Mecanics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 17:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-28078</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s better the idea than the final result..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s better the idea than the final result..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/21151/docks-de-paris-jakob-macfarlane/#comment-172233</link>
		<dc:creator>matt stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=21151#comment-172233</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily Docks de Paris/Jakob + MacFarlane http://tinyurl.com/d8fdw6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily Docks de Paris/Jakob + MacFarlane <a href="http://tinyurl.com/d8fdw6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/d8fdw6</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 12:41:58 by W3 Total Cache -->
