<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Franzen house / SchappacherWhite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/20763/franzen-house-schappacherwhite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20763/franzen-house-schappacherwhite/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:31:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulu</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20763/franzen-house-schappacherwhite/#comment-28585</link>
		<dc:creator>Lulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20763#comment-28585</guid>
		<description>Beautiful house.  Given the accessability of the photos it seems as if the architechts were gognizant of keeping with Franzen&#039;s concept whilst giving it a &quot;new modern&quot; feel.  Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful house.  Given the accessability of the photos it seems as if the architechts were gognizant of keeping with Franzen&#8217;s concept whilst giving it a &#8220;new modern&#8221; feel.  Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceno</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20763/franzen-house-schappacherwhite/#comment-27782</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 07:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20763#comment-27782</guid>
		<description>this house looks really comfortable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this house looks really comfortable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo Lucky</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20763/franzen-house-schappacherwhite/#comment-27628</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20763#comment-27628</guid>
		<description>Nice house and it seems that Gregory Cranford did a good and sensible rehabilitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice house and it seems that Gregory Cranford did a good and sensible rehabilitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20763/franzen-house-schappacherwhite/#comment-27621</link>
		<dc:creator>francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20763#comment-27621</guid>
		<description>What a site, WOW! The house is so lucky exist there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a site, WOW! The house is so lucky exist there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Glenn Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20763/franzen-house-schappacherwhite/#comment-27586</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Glenn Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20763#comment-27586</guid>
		<description>Would it not seem that an important architectural house with an equally sensitive restoration and studied expansion deserves to be documented in a better way?  It is a baffling challenge trying to understand why professionals, particularly in the field of restoration and preservation, feel that it is appropriate to present their work to the world using cellphone photography.  The house, Ulrich Franzen, the owners, and your own studio deserve better than that. 

Terry Glenn Phipps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it not seem that an important architectural house with an equally sensitive restoration and studied expansion deserves to be documented in a better way?  It is a baffling challenge trying to understand why professionals, particularly in the field of restoration and preservation, feel that it is appropriate to present their work to the world using cellphone photography.  The house, Ulrich Franzen, the owners, and your own studio deserve better than that. </p>
<p>Terry Glenn Phipps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
