Comments on: Kamran Kopaei / Amordad design developer

By: ali rahi

ali rahi — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:27:50 +0000

aliye

By: Mr Owl

Mr Owl — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:28:15 +0000

Ok, from a western point of view this building starts off with a commotion..but since it’s not meant western, our view towards certain symbolism (which also appears in the fascade by the way) is quite irrelevant.

By: mohammad

mohammad — Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:13:19 +0000

kheyli bahale

By: masoud nasr

masoud nasr — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:25:22 +0000

20!

By: rain

rain — Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:36:32 +0000

hello.please hellp me!where is bulding in the esfahan?street or lane?

By: h.shahriari

h.shahriari — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:45:55 +0000

sorry i didnt know that the coments are in english.however you mixed iranian features and modern feature.i think its much more better than those huge aluminium volume that we see in tehran or other parts of iran or the world.good luck and continue working in this way.creative and iranian

By: Hooman

Hooman — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:49:18 +0000

Hello.
Im an Iranian and I live in Isfahan. This is not a good example of Iranian architecture. brick use verymuch in isfahan but there is not enough reasons to this design and this using bricks.

By: aniavetis

aniavetis — Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:18:41 +0000

Kamran Kopaei / Amordad design developer | ArchDaily http://t.co/9OR3gHm via @archdaily

By: mst

mst — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:07:28 +0000

I lone esfahan

By: Soussan

Soussan — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:41:36 +0000

Traditional meets contemporary design
http://www.archdaily.com/20550/kamran-kopaei-amordad-design-developer/

By: ali jafari

ali jafari — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:46:19 +0000

sorry, which strict regulation are you talking about?I believe Iran is one of few countries where designers could do what they want.the trouble is currently most of them just follow the trend which is led by property developers who mostly used to be simple builders.

By: Sumer

Sumer — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:36:29 +0000

To some extent I agree with Lucas. Some of these photos are the “Art of Photography” and not necessarily Architecture. The brick pattern on the elevation is SO CHAOTIC! Iranians and Persian have a great background in brick work in history. Is this what it has become now? Good effort in general though!

By: Lucas Gray

Lucas Gray — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:30:11 +0000

I think the main atrium with the dark shiny walls and stained glass window is incredibly ugly. I do like the varying use of brick on the facade though. I appreciate the requirement to conform with traditional architecture but in general I don’t think this building is all that fantastic. Most of the internal spaces seem dark and rather dated.

By: maryamnademi

maryamnademi — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:57:09 +0000

its a nice achievement,considering using brick in Isfahan is mandatory.and nice modern approach to traditional architecture.

By: Aryo

Aryo — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:42:11 +0000

great design.

dear Baptiste Lenoir, Swastika is an Iranian symbol.
please read, before commenting!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Swastika_iran.jpg

This Iranian necklace, with Swastika motifs was excavated from Kaluraz, Guilan, Northern Iran, first millennium BC, National Museum of Iran.

By: garsivaz

garsivaz — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:18:42 +0000

indubitably it’s iranian sign and the facts show that you are a great architecture.

By: Omid.K.M

Omid.K.M — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:15:45 +0000

amazing.., good luck dear friend

By: Omid.K.M

Omid.K.M — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:15:13 +0000

amazing, good luck dear friend

By: milad

milad — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:13:37 +0000

i m accept to kamran

By: kamran

kamran — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:22:21 +0000

to Baptiste Lenoir :
befor this is not swastika, this is an Iranian sign come from more than 5000 years ago.