3 American Cities: Future Forecasting

© Wikimedia Commons / Jonik

The AIA recently published a reprint from the National Associates Committee journal Forward by author Wellington Reiter, FAIA. The hot topic essay goes into great detail discussing how three U.S. – Detroit, Phoenix, and – are serving as examples of the impacts of adverse planning and general continuation of unsustainable behavior.  While in times past these cities have flourished, and grew on the assumption that the trend would continue inevitably, they are sharp reminders of the consequences of naivety in regards to long term sustainability. More after the break.

© Wikimedia Commons / Gobeirne

The vast urban sprawl of Phoenix, Arizona – one of the largest cities in the country – across the Sonoran Desert with single family detached homes presents an undeniable question of how long the growth can continue.  With an area twice the size of Detroit, and a metropolitan area that dwarfs it, this automobile dependent city has thrived with the introduction of federal highway systems. This coupled with extremely low land prices, cheap labor, and a developer friendly environment has encouraged this horizontal city to continue its reach far into the desert. Of course, the housing market crash has reined in to some extent this behavior, one can only question if things will change as the market rebounds. Another serious issue facing this metropolis is our basic necessity of water. One only needs to look at the bathtub rings at Lake Mead to realize that a continual increase of population and sprawl within this region is completely unsustainable. As our peak oil era closes in, how long will individuals be able to commute from distant suburbs into the core of the city? These are just some of the main issues facing the booming city of Phoenix.

© Wikimedia Commons / Ritcheypro

Detroit, once the thriving city of the automobile has suffered a long and drawn out reversal of its boom times. As the headquarters for vehicle manufacturing, its population was heavily dependent upon this industry to provide subsistence.  The resultant crash of the auto manufacturing industry hard severe repercussions on the populace. With significant amount of individuals out of work, poverty skyrocketed, and once bustling neighborhoods have been abandoned while squalor runs rampant. Over the past century the population of Detroit has shrunk 50% – with 25% of occurring in the last decade.  In turn, the tax base of the city has shrunk accordingly – leaving less money for the maintenance of infrastructure and social programs. The effect continues to snowball, and without proactive and diligent mitigation the situation will only continue to work. Detroit remains an example of the devastating effects that can decimate a city that depended almost entirely on one industry.

© Wikimedia Commons / SEWilco

New Orleans suffers from geographic location at the mouth Mississippi River.  A substantial portion of the city lies below sea level, with only levees to protect it from the onslaught of Gulf storms. Hurricane Katrina illustrated the necessity much more developed means for disaster relief, as well as need to work with the obvious danger of a city under threat of continuous flooding. Post-hurricane plans have acutely called for the contraction of the city onto land that is less prone to flooding. While many of the wards that were hit the hardest remain empty, those that have returned have engaged in proactive construction that will resist another disaster level storm surge much more efficiently.

© Wikimedia Commons / Infrogmation

With an ever expanding population and dwindling resources, these issues will become more evident in the day to day life of Americans. The three cities discussed in the essay illuminate the need to become proactive and critically apply the wisdom attained through the trials and tribulations each city has and continues to face.

© Wikimedia Commons / Ixitixel

Read the entire essay here.

References: www.aia.org
Photographs: Wikimedia Commons Users: Infrogmation, SEWilco, Ixitixel, Ritcheypro, Jonik, Gobeirne

Cite: Winstanley, Tim. "3 American Cities: Future Forecasting" 07 Feb 2012. ArchDaily. Accessed 24 Apr 2014. <http://www.archdaily.com/?p=205404>

3 comments

  1. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    Not sure how true this article is to the report it advertises; and I can’t help anyone with details concerning Phoenix or Detroit.

    But New Orleans is no where near the mouth of the Mississippi River, by air or river.

    And the levees are not, repeat not, the city’s only protection against storms or torrents, even in simple engineering terms.

    Even the general news sources have covered the network of spillways protecting south Louisiana.

    Beyond that, I’d think that architects would be at least aware of the value of the coastal marsh as a buffer for coastal communities.

    It is a critical failure of discipline in design to over simplify such a discussion, ignoring elements of context that cost hundreds of millions of dollars, covers thousands of square miles, affects hundreds of thousands of lives; and will involve the possible coordination of effort and resources from a third of aa continent to preserve or repair.

    • Thumb up Thumb down -1

      Thank you. And I just love how the media continues to portray that “many of the wards that were hit the hardest remain empty.” Bit of advice: try visiting the cities you write about BEFORE reporting ignorant information on them.

Share your thoughts