AutoDesk Fake or Foto Challenge

Apr 2009

By Sebastian J — Filed under: Misc , Autodesk, Game

▼

Add this to My Bookmarks:

share by email

share by email

Here’s a little game developed by AutoDesk. You get to see 10 images. Some of them are photographs of real objects or scenes, others are created by computer graphics (CG) artists.

Test your ability to tell which among the array of images are real, and which are CG. Play here.

Cite:
Jordana , Sebastian . "AutoDesk Fake or Foto Challenge" 22 Apr 2009. ArchDaily. Accessed 10 Feb 2012. <http://www.archdaily.com/20362>

Comments (20)
Tweets (0)
Links to this entry (1)

Chris says:

Woot, 10/12 not bad.

# April 22, 2009 at 20:14

INawe says:

I think I pay way too much attention to renderings because I got a perfect score. ;)

# April 22, 2009 at 20:52

CA says:

All of them right here as well! Some of them were tough tho :P

# April 22, 2009 at 22:17

z says:

Why on earth someone would model a photo realistic London bridge is beyond me..

# April 23, 2009 at 06:25

Ralph Kent says:

11/12. its pretty easy to spot them, and the only one i called wrong (the door) – I thought it was a CGI, was just quite a bad photo.

# April 23, 2009 at 07:55

Teo says:

I feel you Z… 11/12

# April 23, 2009 at 08:07

Erin says:

Tower bridge, not London bridge…fyi

# April 23, 2009 at 10:21

Miguelao says:

I suck at this… I won´t put my score to have some dignity.

London Tower Bridge render ?? WTF???

# April 23, 2009 at 10:37

Jason says:

I got a perfect score as well. It was actually pretty easy. Maybe Autodesk is getting a little too cocky?

# April 23, 2009 at 11:40

Vladimir Konovalov says:

11/12 nice

# April 23, 2009 at 12:13

Rionz says:

9/12 “good eye” but not so good as the ones with 11/12 XD

# April 23, 2009 at 16:47

Fino says:

9 out of 12. Not bad.

that is all.

# April 23, 2009 at 19:04

Palau says:

11 out of 12 its good

# April 23, 2009 at 21:24

martin says:

Haha! Guys, this is great.
And the question “Why would anyone model Tower Bridge?”

Classic:

“Because we CAN!”

I only scored 9/10, logic failed with the wrench.

# April 24, 2009 at 07:15

martin says:

I mean 9/12

# April 24, 2009 at 07:16

james says:

12/12 baby!

# April 24, 2009 at 10:23

Dinsky says:

I also got 10/12, got caught up at the smoothness of window blinds and judge’s hammer. I’m too skeptic, I think…

# April 24, 2009 at 11:36

roadkill says:

20/20 not bad considering i was playing a different game!

# April 24, 2009 at 11:55

u says:

8/12 :(

# April 26, 2009 at 17:10

Biff says:

Crap, only used the thumbs, didnt know you could zoom in!
10/12 anyway lols

# May 20, 2009 at 23:55

dino indra

Latest Comments »

Lucas London on Architects are, do, and/or do not…

why do you let this guy write here?. have anyone gone to his...[+]

Andrei P on Hortus Conclusus / Point Supreme Architects

I like it.[+]

moses on Architects are, do, and/or do not…

except for the word “traditional” i do all of the other donts….writer is...[+]

J S on Kohn Pedersen Fox Hosts Inaugural Exhibition: ‘Cities Unknown’

“By focusing his lens on the lesser known cities,...[+]

Alris on The Earthscraper / BNKR Arquitectura

I am proud of this project realized. Arief Budiman, whether you are an...[+]

Daily newsletter »

David Bainbridge, founder of the Passive Solar Institute, recently sent us his book Passive Solar Architecture. The book is a great introduction for anyone interested in passive solar architecture. The content is kept simple and straightforward. It allows any…