<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AD Round Up: Mixed Use Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/20261/ad-round-up-mixed-use-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20261/ad-round-up-mixed-use-part-i/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD Round Up: Mixed Use Part II &#124; ArchDaily</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20261/ad-round-up-mixed-use-part-i/#comment-73054</link>
		<dc:creator>AD Round Up: Mixed Use Part II &#124; ArchDaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20261#comment-73054</guid>
		<description>[...] Another &#8220;Part II&#8221; Round Up to finish this week. This time, we bring back previously featured mixed use projects. And if you didn&#8217;t catch our first part, it&#8217;s never to late, check it out right here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another &#8220;Part II&#8221; Round Up to finish this week. This time, we bring back previously featured mixed use projects. And if you didn&#8217;t catch our first part, it&#8217;s never to late, check it out right here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodrigo bocater</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20261/ad-round-up-mixed-use-part-i/#comment-26118</link>
		<dc:creator>rodrigo bocater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20261#comment-26118</guid>
		<description>someone is constantly forgetting to put the REX website(http://www.rex-ny.com) link on the articles here for a long time!

everybody knows that it still OMA´s architecture, but its not fair to those guys who worked on their projects don´t have their names beeing cited!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone is constantly forgetting to put the REX website(http://www.rex-ny.com) link on the articles here for a long time!</p>
<p>everybody knows that it still OMA´s architecture, but its not fair to those guys who worked on their projects don´t have their names beeing cited!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 12:16:31 by W3 Total Cache -->
