Comments on: New Church in Foligno – Doriana e Massimiliano Fuksas

By: sina pakand

sina pakand — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:32:49 +0000

Awesome!
simple,modern,functional,aestetic…
perfect!

By: Ольга Колосова

Ольга Колосова — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:58:35 +0000

New Church in Foligno – Doriana e Massimiliano Fuksas | ArchDaily http://t.co/qCcVSfcv с помощью @archdaily

By: NozomiKobayashi

NozomiKobayashi — Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:32:55 +0000

New Church in Foligno – Doriana e Massimiliano Fuksas | ArchDaily http://t.co/miI9z0iu via @archdaily

By: Rajan Reddy

Rajan Reddy — Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:48:45 +0000

New Church in Foligno – Doriana e Massimiliano Fuksas | ArchDaily http://t.co/FDsksZs via @archdaily

By: Foligno, San Paolo Apostolo plébániaközpont (2001-2009) « Szakrális építészet

Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:16:04 +0000

[...] archdaily [...]

By: onion_papa

onion_papa — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:20:15 +0000

http://tinyurl.com/c8uk7g
New Church in Foligno – Doriana e Massimiliano Fuksas | ArchDaily
(WWW.ARCHDAILY.COM)

By: Hermann Ruiz

Hermann Ruiz — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:28:45 +0000

New Church in Foligno – Doriana e Massimiliano Fuksas | ArchDaily http://ff.im/-gkZQ9

By: allison

allison — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:02:40 +0000

Abominable. Shd be torn down. Who commissioned ‘this’? Message is “Wake up and die.” Where is Foligno?

By: thebill_X7

thebill_X7 — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:01:58 +0000

Amen. It’s sad in Warsaw – the Germans destroyed her, the commies rebuilt her in their manner. I live in Poznan – our old town has been rebuilt to resemble not only the pre-war conditions, but even some of the buildings found in Poznan’s panorama from “Civitates Orbis Terrarum” from the early 17th century.

By: historyk

historyk — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:40:26 +0000

Very ugly, cold and last but not least, without spirit. Good place for a supermarket but I can’t feel God’s presence there.Sad building.Sad times.

By: Lord Kedaar

Lord Kedaar — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:45:01 +0000

I agree with thebill_X7. I live in Poland, in awful Warsaw, where we have plenty disgusting public buildings like that “church”…

By: thebill_X7

thebill_X7 — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:42:42 +0000

Great, but the local people hate it. This doesn’t look like a church, it doesn’t have that special thing. It’s looks like Polish commie train stations from the 80′s.

By: titisnurabadi

titisnurabadi — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:24:41 +0000

awesome!!the space…the proportion…i enjoy it!

By: Mark Magazine #21 | ArchDaily

Mark Magazine #21 | ArchDaily — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:09:13 +0000

[...] Closing this section, a house in Jakarta by Mamostudio, the Sliding House in Suffolk by dRMM and the New Church in Foligno by Doriana & Massimiliano Fuksas. [...]

By: corto

corto — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:11:51 +0000

so, is architecture only a large-scaled art installment or a sculpture which you can get inside?

I think what you may experience inside this building is very subjective and already defined by the architect which makes it poor in sense of inner atmosphere.

By: ron

ron — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:59:16 +0000

this is a very significant definition of what architecture and character.

By: AD Round Up: Religious Architecture Part II | ArchDaily

AD Round Up: Religious Architecture Part II | ArchDaily — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:30:57 +0000

[...] New Church in Foligno / Doriana e Massimiliano Fuksas The project was won in 2001 after a national competition organized by the Conferenza Episcopale Italiana for the construction of new churches, the jury gave the following reasons for choosing, “as a sign of innovation that meets the latest international research, becoming a symbol of rebirth for the city after the earthquake (read more…) [...]

By: Materiaal inspiratie: beton - Aureon architectuur weblog

Materiaal inspiratie: beton - Aureon architectuur weblog — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:27:06 +0000

[...] Door Massimiliano Fuksas. Bron. [...]

By: frankenstein

frankenstein — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 03:04:56 +0000

Yes, being a critic is the easiest thing in the world, but as you will notice from my original post, I was not very critical of the built structure itself (one may even consider the terms “compelling” and “evocative” rather complimentary). I was much more focused on what was written about it. That is where the “subjective philosophy” as you call it (accurately, I might add) comes into play, but not by me. My perspective on the Church (not a building, but the Body of Believers), is not subjective, but rather based on the clear teachings of Scripture (which I would guess you might claim are also subjective, but I would disagree – but that’s another thread altogether). In any case, the history of all of humanistic philosophy is a series of one subjective rant countered by another subjective rant, so I would say this paradigm does “work,” in that it is all there is (again, from a humanistic perspective). What is the humanistic alternative? Although I was once an avid proponent, I now reject humanism, so I am not bound by that system any longer. I can comment freely (and thanks for your comment BTW). And for the record, my stuff does get built. It just happens to focus on telecommunications structures like monopoles, lattice towers and the occasional church steeple (!). While I have a background in architecture, I now work as a licensed civil engineer (shh… don’t tell the other posters or they’ll tease me). I hope lots of your stuff gets built – I’d be OK with that. Just let the building do the talking (so to speak) and don’t let any architectural magazine editors make any comments! :-]

By: Jesustein

Jesustein — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:08:12 +0000

trying to defeat subjective philosophy with even more subjective philosophy doesn’t work. your idea remains in your mind and nothing of yours gets built frankenstein, and i’m okay with that.. lol