<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House of Inclusion / FORM &#124; Kouichi Kimura</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davide Romeo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-1020675</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide Romeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-1020675</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;House of Inclusion / FORM &#124; Kouichi Kimura &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/0irRFu4O via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">House of Inclusion / FORM | Kouichi Kimura | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/0irRFu4O" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/0irRFu4O</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VCENZ</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-1020676</link>
		<dc:creator>VCENZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-1020676</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;House of Inclusion / FORM &#124; Kouichi Kimura &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/CYPTz3M9 via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">House of Inclusion / FORM | Kouichi Kimura | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/CYPTz3M9" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/CYPTz3M9</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 낭만미장원.bindoe</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-254098</link>
		<dc:creator>낭만미장원.bindoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-254098</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;House of Inclusion / FORM &#124; Kouichi Kimura &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/HstMMXa via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">House of Inclusion / FORM | Kouichi Kimura | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/HstMMXa" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/HstMMXa</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HyunChung</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-157572</link>
		<dc:creator>HyunChung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-157572</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;House of Inclusion / FORM &#124; Kouichi Kimura http://ff.im/-56upQ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">House of Inclusion / FORM | Kouichi Kimura <a href="http://ff.im/-56upQ" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-56upQ</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-41373</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-41373</guid>
		<description>The spaces are beautiful. But one bed room is very restricted. When thinking about living kids, it could be a nightmare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spaces are beautiful. But one bed room is very restricted. When thinking about living kids, it could be a nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-39627</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-39627</guid>
		<description>1 The front facade/driveway has no fence.  

2 The backyard gardens in Boston New York and Philadelphia have 6-8 ft high fences.  

3 The &#039;inward-looking&#039; house did not start with the Romans, and was developed simultaneously all of the world, how euro-centric.

4 Good fences make good neighbors.  The absolution of privacy that is currently trendy in the name of &#039;community&#039; is absurd, most people do not want to live in a glass box.  Eveb the Farnesworth house has curtains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 The front facade/driveway has no fence.  </p>
<p>2 The backyard gardens in Boston New York and Philadelphia have 6-8 ft high fences.  </p>
<p>3 The &#8216;inward-looking&#8217; house did not start with the Romans, and was developed simultaneously all of the world, how euro-centric.</p>
<p>4 Good fences make good neighbors.  The absolution of privacy that is currently trendy in the name of &#8216;community&#8217; is absurd, most people do not want to live in a glass box.  Eveb the Farnesworth house has curtains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do it for the Fame &#187; House of Inclusion</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-35354</link>
		<dc:creator>Do it for the Fame &#187; House of Inclusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-35354</guid>
		<description>[...] Link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: House of Inclusion : Future Collective</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-33671</link>
		<dc:creator>House of Inclusion : Future Collective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 02:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-33671</guid>
		<description>[...] Link    Tags: architecture : design : interior design : modern : spaces         Leave a Comment  Name: Required [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link    Tags: architecture : design : interior design : modern : spaces         Leave a Comment  Name: Required [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pakula</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-157576</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pakula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 06:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-157576</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@andywana found it on that site, http://bit.ly/IRqeg&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@andywana found it on that site, <a href="http://bit.ly/IRqeg" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/IRqeg</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32626</link>
		<dc:creator>francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32626</guid>
		<description>Architect and client relationship is more then just meeting basic needs, and privacy is not exclusive. We can tango all season long on what FORM-Kimura has delivered or where he has gathered his strength from ... but we must foremost answer the architect on whether he has succeeded in what he said (see his text) he has set out to achieve. Nevermind going round the world in 80 architects or overcoming the walled-community issues. However, I do believe that an architect should occasional (when the opportunity arise) forget s/he is an elite and slow the acceleration towards a less-friendly aspect of architecture. Everyone need to play a part in a force for better social change, especially an architect with influence, and some might say, it is a duty. 
Perhaps here, it is acceptable in judging that this house is within a comfortable ratio of the variety? Change is a concerted effort. I shall leave you to your intellect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Architect and client relationship is more then just meeting basic needs, and privacy is not exclusive. We can tango all season long on what FORM-Kimura has delivered or where he has gathered his strength from &#8230; but we must foremost answer the architect on whether he has succeeded in what he said (see his text) he has set out to achieve. Nevermind going round the world in 80 architects or overcoming the walled-community issues. However, I do believe that an architect should occasional (when the opportunity arise) forget s/he is an elite and slow the acceleration towards a less-friendly aspect of architecture. Everyone need to play a part in a force for better social change, especially an architect with influence, and some might say, it is a duty.<br />
Perhaps here, it is acceptable in judging that this house is within a comfortable ratio of the variety? Change is a concerted effort. I shall leave you to your intellect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LargoJax</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32604</link>
		<dc:creator>LargoJax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 07:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32604</guid>
		<description>One of the most valued (rare) basic needs in Japan is privacy, and FORM-Kimura has succeeded here. This is not understood by Daniel Con and his possy. Also, Japanese traditionally have a different approach to city planning and exterior treatments of buildings which goes back centuries. The architects, sensitive to these traditions, effectively (as usual) take the needs of their clients and execute with consistency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most valued (rare) basic needs in Japan is privacy, and FORM-Kimura has succeeded here. This is not understood by Daniel Con and his possy. Also, Japanese traditionally have a different approach to city planning and exterior treatments of buildings which goes back centuries. The architects, sensitive to these traditions, effectively (as usual) take the needs of their clients and execute with consistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Glenn Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32553</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Glenn Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32553</guid>
		<description>Well that is just my point.  The alternative that is shown to be better is entirely western, plastic Corbusian in its conception.  Neither does it provide any measure of privacy whatsoever from the street.  

The typology of entirely inward looking, layered housing is fundamentally Roman in conception and pervasive throughout history.  It is rare that a sense of space is actually about space itself in mathematical terms.  Everyone has their preferences, but I don&#039;t find the volumetric composition of what was shown in alternative pleasing in any way.

Color palette is a symmetrical argument, and perhaps the one that is most closely associated with culture.  What Japanese culture recognizes as a natural color palette is not western.  I happen to love it (as did Wright, Scarpa, Neutra, Schindler, Breuer, and every other modernist who visited Japan in the first half of the 20th century) but some may not.

Having actually lived in a New York townhouse (as well as a London townhouse) I can tell you that the urban density is in no way comparable.  The smallest townhouses in New York are roughly triple the size of this built area and many (most) run to four or five times the built area.  There is no parallel to Japanese urban density in the modern world.  

Mr. Kimura&#039;s work has consistently seemed to be divisive here.  I suppose that is a sign of quality.  People who are making cereal boxes elicit scant debate.  Personally, I am a fan of this studio.

Terry Glenn Phipps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that is just my point.  The alternative that is shown to be better is entirely western, plastic Corbusian in its conception.  Neither does it provide any measure of privacy whatsoever from the street.  </p>
<p>The typology of entirely inward looking, layered housing is fundamentally Roman in conception and pervasive throughout history.  It is rare that a sense of space is actually about space itself in mathematical terms.  Everyone has their preferences, but I don&#8217;t find the volumetric composition of what was shown in alternative pleasing in any way.</p>
<p>Color palette is a symmetrical argument, and perhaps the one that is most closely associated with culture.  What Japanese culture recognizes as a natural color palette is not western.  I happen to love it (as did Wright, Scarpa, Neutra, Schindler, Breuer, and every other modernist who visited Japan in the first half of the 20th century) but some may not.</p>
<p>Having actually lived in a New York townhouse (as well as a London townhouse) I can tell you that the urban density is in no way comparable.  The smallest townhouses in New York are roughly triple the size of this built area and many (most) run to four or five times the built area.  There is no parallel to Japanese urban density in the modern world.  </p>
<p>Mr. Kimura&#8217;s work has consistently seemed to be divisive here.  I suppose that is a sign of quality.  People who are making cereal boxes elicit scant debate.  Personally, I am a fan of this studio.</p>
<p>Terry Glenn Phipps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INawe</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32513</link>
		<dc:creator>INawe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32513</guid>
		<description>I agree with Bo on this one. I see nothing wrong with a house &quot;looking&quot; inwards. however the architectural details and awkward spaces inside and out seemed forced or were not pushed far enough in design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Bo on this one. I see nothing wrong with a house &#8220;looking&#8221; inwards. however the architectural details and awkward spaces inside and out seemed forced or were not pushed far enough in design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo Lucki</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32492</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Lucki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32492</guid>
		<description>If I could just jump in... since architecture is a union between form and function AND it is the client who pays architect to have his/her needs satisfied, the outcome IS a fusion of these two factors. The client likely wanted to separate himself from the environment - his right to exercise. What bothers me in this project is that aspects on which architect has more influence than the client (like colour, form and/or technical detail) appear to be somewhat neglected. The house doesn&#039;t harmoniously fit into the surroundings and this is what the architect is accountable for. I can say nothing on the interior as it is a result of Japanese living culture but for a Westerner the house do appears like a prison cell. It would be way less controversial if the architect tried (at least a bit) to be more sensitive to the house setting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could just jump in&#8230; since architecture is a union between form and function AND it is the client who pays architect to have his/her needs satisfied, the outcome IS a fusion of these two factors. The client likely wanted to separate himself from the environment &#8211; his right to exercise. What bothers me in this project is that aspects on which architect has more influence than the client (like colour, form and/or technical detail) appear to be somewhat neglected. The house doesn&#8217;t harmoniously fit into the surroundings and this is what the architect is accountable for. I can say nothing on the interior as it is a result of Japanese living culture but for a Westerner the house do appears like a prison cell. It would be way less controversial if the architect tried (at least a bit) to be more sensitive to the house setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Con</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32491</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32491</guid>
		<description>I believe that this house here is of equal density and achieves MUCH more than Mr. Kimura&#039;s
http://www.archdaily.com/7484/house-n-sou-fujimoto/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that this house here is of equal density and achieves MUCH more than Mr. Kimura&#8217;s<br />
<a href="http://www.archdaily.com/7484/house-n-sou-fujimoto/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/7484/house-n-sou-fujimoto/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Con</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32490</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32490</guid>
		<description>Terry, first as a clarification, I have never lived outside of an urban environment which is why I believe that my comments are just.  I think that you are assuming that I am advocating for suburban American house here. I am not
Look at any typical townhouse in Boston, New York etc...  More dense than this neighborhood in Tokyo (from what I can see in the photos).  Yet in these urban neighborhoods there are clear zones of public and private living.  The public &quot;stoop&quot; facing the street, the living space is plenty private, and if you are lucky enough there is a private garden in the back of the townhouse.  These homes are not windows to the public environment, but they do engage it, which I think is very important in an urban environment.  From a public safety point of view, there needs to be a connection between the residents and the neighborhood.  They need to have their private space, but share the neighborhood.  This house blocks out the neighborhood and the neighbors, and in my opinion is a bad example of URBAN design</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, first as a clarification, I have never lived outside of an urban environment which is why I believe that my comments are just.  I think that you are assuming that I am advocating for suburban American house here. I am not<br />
Look at any typical townhouse in Boston, New York etc&#8230;  More dense than this neighborhood in Tokyo (from what I can see in the photos).  Yet in these urban neighborhoods there are clear zones of public and private living.  The public &#8220;stoop&#8221; facing the street, the living space is plenty private, and if you are lucky enough there is a private garden in the back of the townhouse.  These homes are not windows to the public environment, but they do engage it, which I think is very important in an urban environment.  From a public safety point of view, there needs to be a connection between the residents and the neighborhood.  They need to have their private space, but share the neighborhood.  This house blocks out the neighborhood and the neighbors, and in my opinion is a bad example of URBAN design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32480</link>
		<dc:creator>francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32480</guid>
		<description>Erm, Terry was doing so well until the &quot;challenge&quot;. I doubt FORM would/should/have/dared ... suggest such a notion. The lost of &quot;community&quot; is an important point that Daniel Con made, and it is one that had to be made to bear on a collective rather then the individual. I know it has to begin .... eventually ... one fine day perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, Terry was doing so well until the &#8220;challenge&#8221;. I doubt FORM would/should/have/dared &#8230; suggest such a notion. The lost of &#8220;community&#8221; is an important point that Daniel Con made, and it is one that had to be made to bear on a collective rather then the individual. I know it has to begin &#8230;. eventually &#8230; one fine day perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Glenn Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32469</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Glenn Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32469</guid>
		<description>There is a befuddling quality to this commentary that never ceases to amaze me.  The charitable conclusion is that these canards are floated by people who have very little actual experience of urban living.  It is very hard to understand why a Japanese house is judged forbidding because of the devices it uses to create space and privacy while the same thing in London or New York would draw kudos for ingenuity.  

In case no one was paying attention, the lot line and building code are realities.  Bay at the moon in solicitation of your morning slice of sky until hell freezes over and you won&#039;t make any more space in Japan.  

One the things that I really appreciate about Mr. Kimura&#039;s work is that it is authentically Japanese while taking into account that there is something called the occidental world where great architects have been practicing too.  It is fascinating for me to see the spatial concepts that modern architects in the west (FLW, etc.) cribbed from the tradition of Japanese spatialism (as juxtaposed with obsession with symmetry and duality in other Asian architecture) finally boomerang back to Japan refracted into something that is both fresh and genuine.  

There is a big difference between this architectural language and the essentially western thinking (however clever and audacious it may be) of practitioners such as Toyo Ito or Tadao Ando.  This is satisfying domestic architecture tuned to the needs of its place, its time, and striking all the right notes.

I challenge anyone to post a building in an urban context of equal density that achieves more than Mr. Kimura&#039;s work does.  

Terry Glenn Phipps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a befuddling quality to this commentary that never ceases to amaze me.  The charitable conclusion is that these canards are floated by people who have very little actual experience of urban living.  It is very hard to understand why a Japanese house is judged forbidding because of the devices it uses to create space and privacy while the same thing in London or New York would draw kudos for ingenuity.  </p>
<p>In case no one was paying attention, the lot line and building code are realities.  Bay at the moon in solicitation of your morning slice of sky until hell freezes over and you won&#8217;t make any more space in Japan.  </p>
<p>One the things that I really appreciate about Mr. Kimura&#8217;s work is that it is authentically Japanese while taking into account that there is something called the occidental world where great architects have been practicing too.  It is fascinating for me to see the spatial concepts that modern architects in the west (FLW, etc.) cribbed from the tradition of Japanese spatialism (as juxtaposed with obsession with symmetry and duality in other Asian architecture) finally boomerang back to Japan refracted into something that is both fresh and genuine.  </p>
<p>There is a big difference between this architectural language and the essentially western thinking (however clever and audacious it may be) of practitioners such as Toyo Ito or Tadao Ando.  This is satisfying domestic architecture tuned to the needs of its place, its time, and striking all the right notes.</p>
<p>I challenge anyone to post a building in an urban context of equal density that achieves more than Mr. Kimura&#8217;s work does.  </p>
<p>Terry Glenn Phipps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-32423</link>
		<dc:creator>christos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-32423</guid>
		<description>paint the house white and you have a winner!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paint the house white and you have a winner!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Carpio</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/20020/house-of-inclusion-form-kouichi-kimura/#comment-157583</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Carpio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=20020#comment-157583</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @SurfaceMag Rigid geometries create a surprisingly serene and sentimental space in Shiga, Japan: http://tinyurl.com/q4np3n&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @SurfaceMag Rigid geometries create a surprisingly serene and sentimental space in Shiga, Japan: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/q4np3n" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/q4np3n</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 09:47:49 by W3 Total Cache -->
