<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private library / ERERAS Arquitectos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:28:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ygogolak</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-56265</link>
		<dc:creator>ygogolak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-56265</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re going to call this a &quot;library&quot;, shouldn&#039;t you at least have some pictures with shelving for books? otherwise it&#039;s as ambiguous a space as any other box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to call this a &#8220;library&#8221;, shouldn&#8217;t you at least have some pictures with shelving for books? otherwise it&#8217;s as ambiguous a space as any other box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ygogolak</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-56264</link>
		<dc:creator>ygogolak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-56264</guid>
		<description>Ha, they put sealant in the corner and then stained over it.  Problem is the stain on the wood faded faster than the stain on the sealant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, they put sealant in the corner and then stained over it.  Problem is the stain on the wood faded faster than the stain on the sealant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-47967</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-47967</guid>
		<description>They Kill the Deco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They Kill the Deco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-31349</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-31349</guid>
		<description>Quien Diseno esas puertas???
Son identicas a las que disena y crea
el constructor Ramon Ruiz Rosario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quien Diseno esas puertas???<br />
Son identicas a las que disena y crea<br />
el constructor Ramon Ruiz Rosario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-30586</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-30586</guid>
		<description>I think this is really nice. It has ideal features for a library - nice and cool. I don&#039;t see how an &quot;unfancy&quot; box would be better than a fancy box to be honest!? We can&#039;t exactly go back to Art Deco architecture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is really nice. It has ideal features for a library &#8211; nice and cool. I don&#8217;t see how an &#8220;unfancy&#8221; box would be better than a fancy box to be honest!? We can&#8217;t exactly go back to Art Deco architecture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfvazq@urbana-arquitectura.com</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-26094</link>
		<dc:creator>jfvazq@urbana-arquitectura.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-26094</guid>
		<description>...Colegas, felicidades! (Mis fotos hubieran sido mejores pero las dejamos para el Pritzker :-). Saludos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Colegas, felicidades! (Mis fotos hubieran sido mejores pero las dejamos para el Pritzker :-). Saludos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remwannabe</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-26093</link>
		<dc:creator>remwannabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-26093</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding? This looks like a &quot;modernist&quot; tumor growing out of an Art-Deco building. No one complained? If I were on the condo board I would&#039;ve objected to the whole thing. It&#039;s curious because it seems that the architects were rather sensible (material-wise) but this is just a somewhat fancy box planted onto another building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding? This looks like a &#8220;modernist&#8221; tumor growing out of an Art-Deco building. No one complained? If I were on the condo board I would&#8217;ve objected to the whole thing. It&#8217;s curious because it seems that the architects were rather sensible (material-wise) but this is just a somewhat fancy box planted onto another building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-25944</link>
		<dc:creator>victor manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-25944</guid>
		<description>me parece increible ver esa simple ampliacion bien maquillada
me parece increible que discutan si es arquitectura o no es arquitectura

me parece increible tambien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>me parece increible ver esa simple ampliacion bien maquillada<br />
me parece increible que discutan si es arquitectura o no es arquitectura</p>
<p>me parece increible tambien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berg Lim</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-25937</link>
		<dc:creator>Berg Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-25937</guid>
		<description>It will be a nice project but alone, not as an addition to an existing building.  It lacks any connection with the rest of the building and also it negates the tropicality of its location because it seems that the natural ventilation doesn&#039;t work so well,  the ceiling fan is horrible...   The frontal door is well done.  I should be more careful on the selection of images sent to archdaily...  is this supposed to be a good detail? http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/810630252_10er/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a nice project but alone, not as an addition to an existing building.  It lacks any connection with the rest of the building and also it negates the tropicality of its location because it seems that the natural ventilation doesn&#8217;t work so well,  the ceiling fan is horrible&#8230;   The frontal door is well done.  I should be more careful on the selection of images sent to archdaily&#8230;  is this supposed to be a good detail? <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/810630252_10er/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/810630252_10er/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cristobal</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19994/private-library-ereras-arquitectos/#comment-25886</link>
		<dc:creator>cristobal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19994#comment-25886</guid>
		<description>odris where are you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>odris where are you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
