<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 957 Pacific Street building / Loadingdock5 Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-27685</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19684#comment-27685</guid>
		<description>I walked past this building the other day... very interesting design but there&#039;s a huge hole in the ceiling on the 4th floor. Looks like there&#039;s some design/build issues still outstanding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I walked past this building the other day&#8230; very interesting design but there&#8217;s a huge hole in the ceiling on the 4th floor. Looks like there&#8217;s some design/build issues still outstanding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franco</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-26083</link>
		<dc:creator>Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19684#comment-26083</guid>
		<description>Keep it fun, guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep it fun, guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-25768</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19684#comment-25768</guid>
		<description>Nice project. It would be great if the screens on the facades were solar panels or evacuated tubes or something. I like the simplicity of the interior design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice project. It would be great if the screens on the facades were solar panels or evacuated tubes or something. I like the simplicity of the interior design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eg</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-25673</link>
		<dc:creator>eg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19684#comment-25673</guid>
		<description>Spelled Brooklyn wrong ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spelled Brooklyn wrong ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evan cordes</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-89987</link>
		<dc:creator>evan cordes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19684#comment-89987</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Fun to see our bldg make it to archdaily. RT @loadingdock5 thanks for the 957 pacific posting on archdaily ! http://tiny.cc/khtW6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Fun to see our bldg make it to archdaily. RT @loadingdock5 thanks for the 957 pacific posting on archdaily ! <a href="http://tiny.cc/khtW6" rel="nofollow">http://tiny.cc/khtW6</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patentpolice</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-25584</link>
		<dc:creator>patentpolice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19684#comment-25584</guid>
		<description>Developer should be commended for taking a risk and not following the standard developer formula.  It seems like a long time since a NYC developer built something with elevators and stairs open to the outside.  I&#039;ve only seen that in low-income areas (LeFrak City, an old brick development in Cobble Hill), yet this project doesn&#039;t recall that at all.  Most developers would balk at an external stair, but this one (and the architect) saw an opportunity.

And smart use of FAR regulations, assuming those balconies don&#039;t count against you.  More total apt with same FAR.  

Probably cold as hell in the winter, but good design.  Plans are beautifully simple.  LA living in Williamsburg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Developer should be commended for taking a risk and not following the standard developer formula.  It seems like a long time since a NYC developer built something with elevators and stairs open to the outside.  I&#8217;ve only seen that in low-income areas (LeFrak City, an old brick development in Cobble Hill), yet this project doesn&#8217;t recall that at all.  Most developers would balk at an external stair, but this one (and the architect) saw an opportunity.</p>
<p>And smart use of FAR regulations, assuming those balconies don&#8217;t count against you.  More total apt with same FAR.  </p>
<p>Probably cold as hell in the winter, but good design.  Plans are beautifully simple.  LA living in Williamsburg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loadingdock5</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-163498</link>
		<dc:creator>loadingdock5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19684#comment-163498</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;thanks for the 957 pacific posting on archdaily ! http://tiny.cc/khtW6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">thanks for the 957 pacific posting on archdaily ! <a href="http://tiny.cc/khtW6" rel="nofollow">http://tiny.cc/khtW6</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronson</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/19684/957-pacific-street-building-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-25571</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19684#comment-25571</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a pleasant surprise and a reminder not to judge a book by it&#039;s cover. 

I really love the minimlist simplicity and stylish undercurrent. This is definitely my kind of living space.

Thanks for posting :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pleasant surprise and a reminder not to judge a book by it&#8217;s cover. </p>
<p>I really love the minimlist simplicity and stylish undercurrent. This is definitely my kind of living space.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 20:45:45 by W3 Total Cache -->
