Comments on: Casa Viguet / NdC Arquitectura

By: eva

eva — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:33:44 +0000

Great!!!

By: MDK

MDK — Sun, 31 May 2009 13:17:58 +0000

Always annoying when people call white houses “cold”. Have you heard of “white hot”?

By: BAJ

BAJ — Tue, 05 May 2009 15:37:38 +0000

This appears to be a very effective solution for the issues of security, contemplation, providing a comfortable living space; making a minimal impact on its surroundings. More interior photos would have been appreciated of the bath and sleeping area, but it looks very livable to me.

Too many critics!

By: Anne

Anne — Fri, 01 May 2009 13:09:20 +0000

Looking at the plan, it does seem to be a nice house to live in. More interior shots would have been great.

By: NdC Arquitectura - Casa Viguet | ...ambushU.com...

NdC Arquitectura - Casa Viguet | ...ambushU.com... — Fri, 01 May 2009 10:25:10 +0000

[...] via ArchDaily more pics and details after jump [...]

By: Michele Jacob

Michele Jacob — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:49:10 +0000

Casa Viguet / NdC Arquitectura – http://tinyurl.com/cw6g23

By: rafael martin

rafael martin — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:34:38 +0000

#architecture Casa Viguet / NdC Arquitectura http://tinyurl.com/cw6g23

By: francis

francis — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:32:58 +0000

Leaving aside the choice of architectural vocabulary and detailing because it is soooo at odds with mine, I would like therefore focus on the security aspect instead. The building seem to have embroil the situation rather than resolving it. A subtle approach by taking the entire site into consideration would prove more successful instead of just dropping a “cage” into it.

By: evap

evap — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:49:36 +0000

The design vocabulary is a bit too much.

By: Van

Van — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:10:33 +0000

The project is interesting. but the elevation is strange…with the same background in different color, it confuse the reader. I realy dont like the illustration, get help for your “rendering” or dont do it. A good CAD drawing is better than a poor illustration.

By: teo

teo — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:44:04 +0000

Shadows could have been created in in other ways, same goes with security. Argentina is known for its wildlife, and every nook and cranny is a perfect hideout for snakes and spiders, not to mention the accumulating dust. I’m sure the costs warn’t high but the results aren’t that great either.

By: Marcus

Marcus — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:19 +0000

Nice design. But I dont think it is fit for living in. It doesnt portray the qualities of what a home should be.

By: Bo Lucky

Bo Lucky — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:03:51 +0000

Sorry if I wasn’t clear enough… I was referring to the house, not to the pictures… does anybody live there?

By: Daniel Con

Daniel Con — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:43:18 +0000

Come on, do any architectural photographs look as if someone actually lives there???

By: Bo Lucky

Bo Lucky — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:33:58 +0000

Looks like nobody lives there – wonder why?

By: alejandro

alejandro — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:33:34 +0000

I agree with Lucas it´s a bit cold

Although it has good ideas, details are poorly executed

Care to explain please what does “where uses hybridize and link with the exterior” really mean?

Thanks

By: Daniel Con

Daniel Con — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:28:54 +0000

I’ve been trying to solve the problem of security for a house in Africa and this is a beautiful solution! Much better than iron bars!!!

By: Lucas Gray

Lucas Gray — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:24:15 +0000

The interior shadows and natural light is great.
It looks a little bit cold for a house though.