Comments on: Cabel Industry / Massimo Mariani http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/ Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day. Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:04:23 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: BROSALIN http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-36182 BROSALIN Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:44:32 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-36182 ну ничего себееееее! ну ничего себееееее!

]]> By: jaqui http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24658 jaqui Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:10:04 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24658 yes, an ugly building! yes, an ugly building!

]]> By: Opium http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24476 Opium Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:22:26 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24476 Well sam there was scarpa and terragnani in the 50's and 30's...but yes...a slow and steady decadence of italian architecture...guess that they've lost their touch and can only design shoes...La povera italia Well sam there was scarpa and terragnani in the 50’s and 30’s…but yes…a slow and steady decadence of italian architecture…guess that they’ve lost their touch and can only design shoes…La povera italia

]]> By: lex http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24470 lex Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:47:55 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24470 Yes I agree - A. Palladio would turn in his own grave when he could see what kind of "criminal acts" Mariani does... Yes I agree – A. Palladio would turn in his own grave when he could see what kind of “criminal acts” Mariani does…

]]> By: sam http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24469 sam Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:43:35 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24469 The elevations dominate everything....the problem is the handicap of the elevation to the rooms behind......the building wants to be a fabric, defenetly not an officebuilding! where are the good italian architects??? the best I remember was brunellesci, borromini or palladio - thats a time ago!! The elevations dominate everything….the problem is the handicap of the elevation to the rooms behind……the building wants to be a fabric, defenetly not an officebuilding! where are the good italian architects??? the best I remember was brunellesci, borromini or palladio – thats a time ago!!

]]> By: greg http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24467 greg Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:39:18 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24467 "stylistic design" a typically nonsense architecture... “stylistic design” a typically nonsense architecture…

]]> By: Mr. Cheap http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24345 Mr. Cheap Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:54:54 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24345 The idea is to work with circles, and avoid corners, -BUT WHY ? The architect said it himself, this is "stylistic design" ... The idea is to work with circles, and avoid corners, -BUT WHY ? The architect said it himself, this is “stylistic design” …

]]> By: tom http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24321 tom Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:25:39 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24321 what an ugly building what an ugly building

]]> By: Opium http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24305 Opium Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:38:51 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24305 Well well...A shame the earthquake didn't hit this one...how old is the guy who did this?either a teenager or a 60's hippie...either case a sci fi hardcore fan. Well well…A shame the earthquake didn’t hit this one…how old is the guy who did this?either a teenager or a 60’s hippie…either case a sci fi hardcore fan.

]]> By: Fino http://www.archdaily.com/19099/cabel-industry-massimo-mariani/#comment-24296 Fino Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:04:54 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=19099#comment-24296 It is different, but I couldn't take this too seriously. Hm, Post Modernism at its best. It looks "fun", but was it really necessary as how it sits in the environment? It has such an inward quality to it, being about itself and about a separate agenda. From the outside, it seems so much like an object, and less about architecture. There are some nice moments of the interior at least. that is all. It is different, but I couldn’t take this too seriously. Hm, Post Modernism at its best. It looks “fun”, but was it really necessary as how it sits in the environment? It has such an inward quality to it, being about itself and about a separate agenda. From the outside, it seems so much like an object, and less about architecture. There are some nice moments of the interior at least.

that is all.

]]>