<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snefjord Road stop / Pushak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: acm</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/#comment-129290</link>
		<dc:creator>acm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=17466#comment-129290</guid>
		<description>I live in snefjord, and I have to say that the boxes themselves look allright, but the placement and functionality is horrible. only one of the 6 sitting spots are useful (towards the river, watching the flyfishers), and I have never seen anyone use the other ones. in dusk rain theyre useless, and if your party is larger than 2-3 ppl, then you cant talk to the others unless the rest are standing in front of a booth.
good looks? sure, but does not go well with the surrounding area. functionality? not one bit. The money spent to put these up would go a long way making something more practical AND good looking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in snefjord, and I have to say that the boxes themselves look allright, but the placement and functionality is horrible. only one of the 6 sitting spots are useful (towards the river, watching the flyfishers), and I have never seen anyone use the other ones. in dusk rain theyre useless, and if your party is larger than 2-3 ppl, then you cant talk to the others unless the rest are standing in front of a booth.<br />
good looks? sure, but does not go well with the surrounding area. functionality? not one bit. The money spent to put these up would go a long way making something more practical AND good looking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronson Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/#comment-169883</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronson Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=17466#comment-169883</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@awessendorf that OfficePod is a slick design and if you add one of these to the mix you&#039;ve got a waiting area too - http://bit.ly/NCuzN&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@awessendorf that OfficePod is a slick design and if you add one of these to the mix you&#8217;ve got a waiting area too &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/NCuzN" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/NCuzN</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpd</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/#comment-22095</link>
		<dc:creator>dpd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=17466#comment-22095</guid>
		<description>for me it much more interesting like social object than architectural. It&#039;s great that community pay attention to such things.  Architecture - yes it&#039;s modern, but the form is too much contrasting to landscape and I do not see the reason why to do that. They serve to  observe the nature, but not them:) The colouring is good. Function - I don&#039;t thing that it&#039;s nice to sit there then it rains</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for me it much more interesting like social object than architectural. It&#8217;s great that community pay attention to such things.  Architecture &#8211; yes it&#8217;s modern, but the form is too much contrasting to landscape and I do not see the reason why to do that. They serve to  observe the nature, but not them:) The colouring is good. Function &#8211; I don&#8217;t thing that it&#8217;s nice to sit there then it rains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macapuf</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/#comment-21973</link>
		<dc:creator>macapuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=17466#comment-21973</guid>
		<description>Oh, I would like so much to live and work in a country wich has enough sense and sensibility to finance such architectural pearls...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I would like so much to live and work in a country wich has enough sense and sensibility to finance such architectural pearls&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hristo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/#comment-21751</link>
		<dc:creator>Hristo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=17466#comment-21751</guid>
		<description>I think it could be transformable to a capsule for extream situations as an extra functionality. The form itself mention to that idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it could be transformable to a capsule for extream situations as an extra functionality. The form itself mention to that idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronson Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/#comment-169884</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronson Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=17466#comment-169884</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;You gotta love Norwegian design. Check out this road side stop in Norway designed by Pushak Architects - http://tinyurl.com/d8txgc&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">You gotta love Norwegian design. Check out this road side stop in Norway designed by Pushak Architects &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/d8txgc" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/d8txgc</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronson</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/17466/snefjord-road-stop-pushak/#comment-21706</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=17466#comment-21706</guid>
		<description>Those are really cool, both functionally and aesthetically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are really cool, both functionally and aesthetically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 10:12:24 by W3 Total Cache -->
