<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOM included in &#8220;The World&#8217;s 50 Most Innovative Companies&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yasushi nakamura</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/#comment-694593</link>
		<dc:creator>yasushi nakamura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16373#comment-694593</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;2009年のランキングですが、SOMも含め、活躍が顕著な設計事務所が選ばれていますね→SOM included in “The World’s 50 Most Innovative Companies” &#124;  http://t.co/XbH2j3Z via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">2009年のランキングですが、SOMも含め、活躍が顕著な設計事務所が選ばれていますね→SOM included in “The World’s 50 Most Innovative Companies” |  <a href="http://t.co/XbH2j3Z" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/XbH2j3Z</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Apprentice.</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/#comment-133744</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Apprentice.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16373#comment-133744</guid>
		<description>I am currently entering architecture school and am a great fan of the modern, the power of simple concepts..as these are the most &#039;universal&#039; and not as subjective in their aesthetic appeal.

I dont like &#039;blobs&#039;/ excessively computer generated architecture, though there are some tools from here that can be applied delicately with the simpler concepts (like those found in the works of Louis Kahn, for me)...with interesting results. 

We are sometimes getting too trigger happy with technology, just because we can, does not mean we should...could be moving us away from our &#039;spirit&#039;. The &#039;fashionable&#039; differs from the timeless, and the thing that is least in fashion is the one that just was...longevity of these buildings appeal doesn&#039;t seem too attractive. 

but if wielded correctly..can get interesting and useful results (e.g. FOA Japan port terminal for me) 

a luta continua</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently entering architecture school and am a great fan of the modern, the power of simple concepts..as these are the most &#8216;universal&#8217; and not as subjective in their aesthetic appeal.</p>
<p>I dont like &#8216;blobs&#8217;/ excessively computer generated architecture, though there are some tools from here that can be applied delicately with the simpler concepts (like those found in the works of Louis Kahn, for me)&#8230;with interesting results. </p>
<p>We are sometimes getting too trigger happy with technology, just because we can, does not mean we should&#8230;could be moving us away from our &#8216;spirit&#8217;. The &#8216;fashionable&#8217; differs from the timeless, and the thing that is least in fashion is the one that just was&#8230;longevity of these buildings appeal doesn&#8217;t seem too attractive. </p>
<p>but if wielded correctly..can get interesting and useful results (e.g. FOA Japan port terminal for me) </p>
<p>a luta continua</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD Interviews: Craig Hartman / SOM &#124; ArchDaily</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/#comment-52085</link>
		<dc:creator>AD Interviews: Craig Hartman / SOM &#124; ArchDaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16373#comment-52085</guid>
		<description>[...] Fast Company named SOM among the 50 Most Innovative Companies, and Architect Magazine recently awarded five SOM projects with their R+D Award: The San Francisco [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fast Company named SOM among the 50 Most Innovative Companies, and Architect Magazine recently awarded five SOM projects with their R+D Award: The San Francisco [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsheng</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/#comment-33033</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 11:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16373#comment-33033</guid>
		<description>simplicity may not be the best solution to deal with all the problems
perhaps Rem&#039;s complexity theory is a disposal for the future
my opinion~~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simplicity may not be the best solution to deal with all the problems<br />
perhaps Rem&#8217;s complexity theory is a disposal for the future<br />
my opinion~~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megaloman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/#comment-19080</link>
		<dc:creator>megaloman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16373#comment-19080</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m crying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m crying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bendangwuren</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/#comment-19051</link>
		<dc:creator>bendangwuren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16373#comment-19051</guid>
		<description>so sad about the architecture situation now :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so sad about the architecture situation now :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/#comment-18937</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16373#comment-18937</guid>
		<description>They may be innovative all right but it has very little to do with architecture.. look at the above picture.. vulgar formalism, that&#039;s what one may call it (maybe some will say that the above form is shaped by the movement of the wind.. and it&#039;s a green design an so on but it&#039;s not a good justification).
I miss the modern movement... simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They may be innovative all right but it has very little to do with architecture.. look at the above picture.. vulgar formalism, that&#8217;s what one may call it (maybe some will say that the above form is shaped by the movement of the wind.. and it&#8217;s a green design an so on but it&#8217;s not a good justification).<br />
I miss the modern movement&#8230; simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbArAmA</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16373/som-included-in-the-worlds-50-most-innovative-companies/#comment-167044</link>
		<dc:creator>urbArAmA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16373#comment-167044</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: SOM included in “The World’s 50 Most Innovative Companies”: Skidmore, Owings Merrill (SOM) http://tinyurl.com/deu6wj&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: SOM included in “The World’s 50 Most Innovative Companies”: Skidmore, Owings Merrill (SOM) <a href="http://tinyurl.com/deu6wj" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/deu6wj</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-11 07:24:03 by W3 Total Cache -->
