<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORDOS 100 #26: FRENTE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:17:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Béneyt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-732166</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Béneyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-732166</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Poetic. http://t.co/X2jJslZ #architecture&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Poetic. <a href="http://t.co/X2jJslZ" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/X2jJslZ</a> #architecture</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cesar Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-301857</link>
		<dc:creator>Cesar Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-301857</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;FRENTE #ArchDaily http://t.co/JoaXKQX ...casa en un bosque artificial ..........#arquitectura&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">FRENTE #ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/JoaXKQX" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/JoaXKQX</a> &#8230;casa en un bosque artificial &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.#arquitectura</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .c.i.c.i.s.</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-180178</link>
		<dc:creator>.c.i.c.i.s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-180178</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;ada ada aja arsitek -_- http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">ada ada aja arsitek -_- <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bakaity Bea</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-157197</link>
		<dc:creator>Bakaity Bea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-157197</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Reading: &quot;ORDOS 100 #26: FRENTE &#124; ArchDaily&quot;( http://twitthis.com/82aepx )&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Reading: &quot;ORDOS 100 #26: FRENTE | ArchDaily&quot;( <a href="http://twitthis.com/82aepx" rel="nofollow">http://twitthis.com/82aepx</a> )</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan E.A.I.</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-157200</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan E.A.I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-157200</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Wanna see a preview of my #tesis?? http://bit.ly/3XhcHl [ One hour for find this fuckin project.. #epicfail]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Wanna see a preview of my #tesis?? <a href="http://bit.ly/3XhcHl" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3XhcHl</a> [ One hour for find this fuckin project.. #epicfail]</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ordos Project &#8211; Living Underground &#171; Elevate</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-52158</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ordos Project &#8211; Living Underground &#171; Elevate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-52158</guid>
		<description>[...] Designer: Juan Pablo Maza via Arch Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Designer: Juan Pablo Maza via Arch Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living Underground in Style &#124; Bookmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-25910</link>
		<dc:creator>Living Underground in Style &#124; Bookmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-25910</guid>
		<description>[...] Designer: Juan Pablo Maza via Arch Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Designer: Juan Pablo Maza via Arch Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dejivrur</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-23084</link>
		<dc:creator>dejivrur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-23084</guid>
		<description>why can&#039;t it be more... socialistic... this masterpiece here is far far beyond introvert state... alienating itself beyond the environtment around....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why can&#8217;t it be more&#8230; socialistic&#8230; this masterpiece here is far far beyond introvert state&#8230; alienating itself beyond the environtment around&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: precious</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-22670</link>
		<dc:creator>precious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-22670</guid>
		<description>aside from the way that the extra columns are used as a prop to disguise, its a great project.  although the architect argues that it achieves a blurring of the support columns, which to his credit it does, i think it currently is a distraction without function, but Ozzie&#039;s got a great suggestion.  

the design plays a fantastic rhetorical gesture (intended or not by the architect) on the traditional Chinese courtyard house.  it could use a little vegetation though as it&#039;s a bit stark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aside from the way that the extra columns are used as a prop to disguise, its a great project.  although the architect argues that it achieves a blurring of the support columns, which to his credit it does, i think it currently is a distraction without function, but Ozzie&#8217;s got a great suggestion.  </p>
<p>the design plays a fantastic rhetorical gesture (intended or not by the architect) on the traditional Chinese courtyard house.  it could use a little vegetation though as it&#8217;s a bit stark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozzie</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-22663</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-22663</guid>
		<description>I agree, the columns are poetic. The house wants to be one of those jewels in a forest... the glass box forest tree house archi-type, except it’s not I a forest.

I also agree that I struggle to accept the columns as they perform NO function, they are purely poetic, and truly great architectural expressions are is both poetic and pragmatic, it’s finding that balance that makes architecture so complex.

Solution: put one of those elegant 3 blade wind props on top of each column, so they generate power for the site ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the columns are poetic. The house wants to be one of those jewels in a forest&#8230; the glass box forest tree house archi-type, except it’s not I a forest.</p>
<p>I also agree that I struggle to accept the columns as they perform NO function, they are purely poetic, and truly great architectural expressions are is both poetic and pragmatic, it’s finding that balance that makes architecture so complex.</p>
<p>Solution: put one of those elegant 3 blade wind props on top of each column, so they generate power for the site ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool house design in China &#124; jazarah!</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-22085</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool house design in China &#124; jazarah!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-22085</guid>
		<description>[...] via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ORDOS 100 Plot 35 &#124; TheTechnologyBlog.biz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-20667</link>
		<dc:creator>ORDOS 100 Plot 35 &#124; TheTechnologyBlog.biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-20667</guid>
		<description>[...] Extract from Arch Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Extract from Arch Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IDasia.org &#124; Industrial Design Asia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ORDOS 100 Plot 35</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-20662</link>
		<dc:creator>IDasia.org &#124; Industrial Design Asia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ORDOS 100 Plot 35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-20662</guid>
		<description>[...] Extract from Arch Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Extract from Arch Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ORDOS 100 Plot 35 &#171; technogad</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-20661</link>
		<dc:creator>ORDOS 100 Plot 35 &#171; technogad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-20661</guid>
		<description>[...] from Arch Daily     Posted by daniel toh Filed in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Arch Daily     Posted by daniel toh Filed in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlessandroTomassetti</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-157203</link>
		<dc:creator>AlessandroTomassetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-157203</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Plot #35 of China&#039;s Ordos project  #architecture  http://bit.ly/iXVy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Plot #35 of China&#8217;s Ordos project  #architecture  <a href="http://bit.ly/iXVy" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/iXVy</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponzie</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-20261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-20261</guid>
		<description>Haha, both and!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, both and!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dom</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-20251</link>
		<dc:creator>dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-20251</guid>
		<description>I think everyone is right. It is beautiful and absurd, new and redundant, a solution and a problem. 
And we are all discussing it, and that justifies it for me.
No, I could definitely not live there, but I would love to visit, and I am glad to have seen it.
It can only be worthless if we don&#039;t learn from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone is right. It is beautiful and absurd, new and redundant, a solution and a problem.<br />
And we are all discussing it, and that justifies it for me.<br />
No, I could definitely not live there, but I would love to visit, and I am glad to have seen it.<br />
It can only be worthless if we don&#8217;t learn from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sullka</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-20095</link>
		<dc:creator>sullka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-20095</guid>
		<description>lol at some comments.....hehehe

Mixed feelings about this one, as it is right now  I agree is somehow ridiculous.

I think that the forest-columns-camouflage idea is lost with that amount of columns, now, if they add three times more columns, it will begin to take shape. 

See Patxi Mangad&#039;s Pabellon de España for the Zaragoza expo:
http://www.arqchile.cl/pabellon_espana.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol at some comments&#8230;..hehehe</p>
<p>Mixed feelings about this one, as it is right now  I agree is somehow ridiculous.</p>
<p>I think that the forest-columns-camouflage idea is lost with that amount of columns, now, if they add three times more columns, it will begin to take shape. </p>
<p>See Patxi Mangad&#8217;s Pabellon de España for the Zaragoza expo:<br />
<a href="http://www.arqchile.cl/pabellon_espana.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.arqchile.cl/pabellon_espana.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpd</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-20072</link>
		<dc:creator>dpd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-20072</guid>
		<description>perfect visual effect. The eye didn&#039;t understand  the construction and create the effect of levitation. Maybe it&#039;s not the best idea for living house (threw the house windows it&#039;s better to see trees, not columns :) ) but for public building perfect idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perfect visual effect. The eye didn&#8217;t understand  the construction and create the effect of levitation. Maybe it&#8217;s not the best idea for living house (threw the house windows it&#8217;s better to see trees, not columns :) ) but for public building perfect idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boppie</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/16355/ordos-100-26-frente/#comment-19980</link>
		<dc:creator>Boppie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=16355#comment-19980</guid>
		<description>Haha. Reviewing my own comment, I need to say I probably don&#039;t agree with it myself and should have been less aggressive.
The columns are essential to the project, in my believe. Without these extra columns the concept would have been way less strong. By adding the extra columns the architect suggests there are no columns at all. 
The problem with this Ordos project as a whole is the lack of context. I agree that context should always be an issue, but within this collection of icons the context could be a less important factor. 
I find the Ordos project a disturbingly arrogant project, made for publicity. In my believe the project had more potential in several ways. But maybe I&#039;m to much an idealist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. Reviewing my own comment, I need to say I probably don&#8217;t agree with it myself and should have been less aggressive.<br />
The columns are essential to the project, in my believe. Without these extra columns the concept would have been way less strong. By adding the extra columns the architect suggests there are no columns at all.<br />
The problem with this Ordos project as a whole is the lack of context. I agree that context should always be an issue, but within this collection of icons the context could be a less important factor.<br />
I find the Ordos project a disturbingly arrogant project, made for publicity. In my believe the project had more potential in several ways. But maybe I&#8217;m to much an idealist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 01:25:30 by W3 Total Cache -->
