<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mountain Dwellings / BIG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:09:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-76214</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-76214</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t, actually, that surprising or special.  I have lived in numerous flat which are uniquely designed in a block, owing to a tight site, and I have, like I expect the majority of people on here, worked on designs for blocks where there are numerous &#039;specials&#039; - in terms of unit designs - within a residential scheme.  I think to point that out as a key feature of this building is somewhat clutching at straws to make it sound more interesting that it really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t, actually, that surprising or special.  I have lived in numerous flat which are uniquely designed in a block, owing to a tight site, and I have, like I expect the majority of people on here, worked on designs for blocks where there are numerous &#8217;specials&#8217; &#8211; in terms of unit designs &#8211; within a residential scheme.  I think to point that out as a key feature of this building is somewhat clutching at straws to make it sound more interesting that it really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bullaasf</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-76208</link>
		<dc:creator>bullaasf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-76208</guid>
		<description>actually, this link with explain t better: http://www.vmbjerget.dk/vmbjerget.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, this link with explain t better: <a href="http://www.vmbjerget.dk/vmbjerget.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmbjerget.dk/vmbjerget.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bullaasf</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-76186</link>
		<dc:creator>bullaasf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-76186</guid>
		<description>from the outside the apartments make look (kind of) the same, but really, they are not! 1/3 of the apartments are not only different from the other 2/3, bu also totally unique! In other words, if you live in one of those, it will be the only one of its kind in the building...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the outside the apartments make look (kind of) the same, but really, they are not! 1/3 of the apartments are not only different from the other 2/3, bu also totally unique! In other words, if you live in one of those, it will be the only one of its kind in the building&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pathos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-57515</link>
		<dc:creator>pathos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-57515</guid>
		<description>this is brilliant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is brilliant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreop</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-36221</link>
		<dc:creator>andreop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-36221</guid>
		<description>nice concept, although spacially would feel much like moshe safdie&#039;s habitat 67. privacyless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice concept, although spacially would feel much like moshe safdie&#8217;s habitat 67. privacyless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lasse</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-32379</link>
		<dc:creator>Lasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-32379</guid>
		<description>Carmen - The masterplan (idioticly) states that all shop and cafés must be in a mall close by.. This part of town is striped of street life except people coming to see this building and the neighbouring vm housing..
And to most other crying critics: would you rather have 100% housing and a huge parking lot? 
When a new less function-dived masterplan is done (can&#039;t be long now or Ørestaden will turn into a desert of SALE signs)this is one of the projects that i believe will help to facillitate the transition towards a good and vibrant town..

I actually don&#039;t see how anyone can hate it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carmen &#8211; The masterplan (idioticly) states that all shop and cafés must be in a mall close by.. This part of town is striped of street life except people coming to see this building and the neighbouring vm housing..<br />
And to most other crying critics: would you rather have 100% housing and a huge parking lot?<br />
When a new less function-dived masterplan is done (can&#8217;t be long now or Ørestaden will turn into a desert of SALE signs)this is one of the projects that i believe will help to facillitate the transition towards a good and vibrant town..</p>
<p>I actually don&#8217;t see how anyone can hate it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evap</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-23415</link>
		<dc:creator>evap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-23415</guid>
		<description>short film about conception &amp; first construction phase of mountain dwellings:

http://www.architekturvideo.de/wohnungsbau-im-zeitraffer-die-mountain-dwellings-von-big</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>short film about conception &amp; first construction phase of mountain dwellings:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.architekturvideo.de/wohnungsbau-im-zeitraffer-die-mountain-dwellings-von-big" rel="nofollow">http://www.architekturvideo.de/wohnungsbau-im-zeitraffer-die-mountain-dwellings-von-big</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Mountain&#8217; Dwellings in Copenhagen, Denmark, by BIG Architects &#171; Michael&#8217;s Page</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-22703</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Mountain&#8217; Dwellings in Copenhagen, Denmark, by BIG Architects &#171; Michael&#8217;s Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-22703</guid>
		<description>[...] photos and project specifications can be found at ArchDaily.       Asia Cities- [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] photos and project specifications can be found at ArchDaily.       Asia Cities- [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-20326</link>
		<dc:creator>carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-20326</guid>
		<description>another awful example of Koolhaus-induced built diagrams. Ørestad (where this building is) is a lifeless development without any urban activity because of projects like this. street life anyone?!?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another awful example of Koolhaus-induced built diagrams. Ørestad (where this building is) is a lifeless development without any urban activity because of projects like this. street life anyone?!?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big/#comment-20243</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=15022#comment-20243</guid>
		<description>For completeness, the approximate location:
http://www.tagcrumbs.com/cornelius/placemarks/parkour-movie-my-playground-at-big-mountain-dwellings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For completeness, the approximate location:<br />
<a href="http://www.tagcrumbs.com/cornelius/placemarks/parkour-movie-my-playground-at-big-mountain-dwellings" rel="nofollow">http://www.tagcrumbs.com/cornelius/placemarks/parkour-movie-my-playground-at-big-mountain-dwellings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
