<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORDOS 100 #21: PRODUCTORA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-386131</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-386131</guid>
		<description>this project has nce views. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this project has nce views. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego E. Escamilla</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-157668</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego E. Escamilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-157668</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content"><a href="http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-25978</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-25978</guid>
		<description>It it weren&#039;t for the title i&#039;d thougt that this is some bad second year student project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It it weren&#8217;t for the title i&#8217;d thougt that this is some bad second year student project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alejandro</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-19357</link>
		<dc:creator>alejandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-19357</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with the last comment, moreover architects should emphasize space quality related to human habitation above anything else. Certain level of comfort, visual and thermal efficiencies as such should be a premise. (Filling up remnant space with tables is not an option) perhaps they need to go back to school, comprehend SCALE before anything else, so to be able to acknowledge if their project is pertinent or not. 
It´s sad to see that most of these young promising architecture firms involved in these huge project regard as the most important issue being ‘avant- garde’ making sculptural pieces instead of having actually some humane architecture. 
I love cities, apartment buildings, public transport and personally find the suburbs boring, not a bit avant-garde, a joke on sustainability, pointless. 
Architecture´s (and the art´s in a broader sense) greatest enemy is its search for conceptual abstraction above all, alienating it from the rest of the physical world including humanity. Abstraction, esthetics and reasonable habitation are neither opposed nor dissimilar.  We need pertinence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the last comment, moreover architects should emphasize space quality related to human habitation above anything else. Certain level of comfort, visual and thermal efficiencies as such should be a premise. (Filling up remnant space with tables is not an option) perhaps they need to go back to school, comprehend SCALE before anything else, so to be able to acknowledge if their project is pertinent or not.<br />
It´s sad to see that most of these young promising architecture firms involved in these huge project regard as the most important issue being ‘avant- garde’ making sculptural pieces instead of having actually some humane architecture.<br />
I love cities, apartment buildings, public transport and personally find the suburbs boring, not a bit avant-garde, a joke on sustainability, pointless.<br />
Architecture´s (and the art´s in a broader sense) greatest enemy is its search for conceptual abstraction above all, alienating it from the rest of the physical world including humanity. Abstraction, esthetics and reasonable habitation are neither opposed nor dissimilar.  We need pertinence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Efedz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17525</link>
		<dc:creator>Efedz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17525</guid>
		<description>lol i hadn&#039;t realizes there&#039;s another table behind the stairs.... aweful... the garage is the biggest joke it&#039;s a 1000,sqm house.. a wealthy person is going to buy it.. but all he can park is a car and a smart or a vochito... lol

did you take a look at the beautiful double height view the living room has????

i&#039;m ashamed that an office like that is representing Mexico...  nice to know they&#039;re not the only ones though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol i hadn&#8217;t realizes there&#8217;s another table behind the stairs&#8230;. aweful&#8230; the garage is the biggest joke it&#8217;s a 1000,sqm house.. a wealthy person is going to buy it.. but all he can park is a car and a smart or a vochito&#8230; lol</p>
<p>did you take a look at the beautiful double height view the living room has????</p>
<p>i&#8217;m ashamed that an office like that is representing Mexico&#8230;  nice to know they&#8217;re not the only ones though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Efedz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17524</link>
		<dc:creator>Efedz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17524</guid>
		<description>Productora is (or used to be) one of the most innovative offices in Mexico.. but... i just don&#039;t know what happened to them here... is the most horrible project in ORDOS so far.. just look at the garage.. i just can&#039;t imagine a young lady coming out of there... plus the bedrooms lack of any conection interior-exterior all you can see from a window is a big wall... and if you turn your head a little bit you can look at each others bathroom... a pool table in the middle of a corridor??? come on.. give me a break!!! same happens to the table... 

The worse part is that the whole house (the complete form) is not that interesting... it&#039;s just a stabbed square... how come they dare to present something like this in such a mediated project???.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Productora is (or used to be) one of the most innovative offices in Mexico.. but&#8230; i just don&#8217;t know what happened to them here&#8230; is the most horrible project in ORDOS so far.. just look at the garage.. i just can&#8217;t imagine a young lady coming out of there&#8230; plus the bedrooms lack of any conection interior-exterior all you can see from a window is a big wall&#8230; and if you turn your head a little bit you can look at each others bathroom&#8230; a pool table in the middle of a corridor??? come on.. give me a break!!! same happens to the table&#8230; </p>
<p>The worse part is that the whole house (the complete form) is not that interesting&#8230; it&#8217;s just a stabbed square&#8230; how come they dare to present something like this in such a mediated project???.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cocteau</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17447</link>
		<dc:creator>cocteau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17447</guid>
		<description>WHY SOME OF THE &quot;COOL&quot; ARCHITECTURE VOIDS LOGIC?, I MEAN WHY TO SUFFER TO PARK YOUR CAR? DO WE BREATH ON CONCEPTS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHY SOME OF THE &#8220;COOL&#8221; ARCHITECTURE VOIDS LOGIC?, I MEAN WHY TO SUFFER TO PARK YOUR CAR? DO WE BREATH ON CONCEPTS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claude</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17399</link>
		<dc:creator>claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17399</guid>
		<description>this is going beyond and reason!
cummon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is going beyond and reason!<br />
cummon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franco</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17396</link>
		<dc:creator>Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17396</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me?
These ORDOS Projects seam to be a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me?<br />
These ORDOS Projects seam to be a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bat out of hell</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17395</link>
		<dc:creator>bat out of hell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17395</guid>
		<description>This one is really bad!
Out of the B side of 70&#039;s postmodernism.
I can&#039;t belive guys like this get an invitation from H&amp;deM....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is really bad!<br />
Out of the B side of 70&#8242;s postmodernism.<br />
I can&#8217;t belive guys like this get an invitation from H&amp;deM&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roadkill</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17393</link>
		<dc:creator>roadkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17393</guid>
		<description>speaking of haircuts, I think mine is vaguely more interesting than 85% of the Ordos competition submissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of haircuts, I think mine is vaguely more interesting than 85% of the Ordos competition submissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partick Bateman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17391</link>
		<dc:creator>Partick Bateman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17391</guid>
		<description>paul, i have a slightly better haircut than you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paul, i have a slightly better haircut than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul ALLEN</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17390</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul ALLEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17390</guid>
		<description>Hey Bateman, stop being such a duffus. Don&#039;t you have to return some video tapes or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bateman, stop being such a duffus. Don&#8217;t you have to return some video tapes or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17372</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17372</guid>
		<description>Other
Recent
Dross
Of
Suburbia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other<br />
Recent<br />
Dross<br />
Of<br />
Suburbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partick Bateman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17371</link>
		<dc:creator>Partick Bateman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17371</guid>
		<description>The grass isnt just greener on the other side of the fence in ORDOS... its probably purple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The grass isnt just greener on the other side of the fence in ORDOS&#8230; its probably purple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17366</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t visit a Wimpey Homes estate, so why would I visit this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t visit a Wimpey Homes estate, so why would I visit this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partick Bateman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17358</link>
		<dc:creator>Partick Bateman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17358</guid>
		<description>Individually a lot of these projects look great. its just a shame they are going into the Wimpy Homes masterplan of the Ordos project. Honestly, this place is going to look terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Individually a lot of these projects look great. its just a shame they are going into the Wimpy Homes masterplan of the Ordos project. Honestly, this place is going to look terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14875/ordos-100-21-productora/#comment-17356</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14875#comment-17356</guid>
		<description>Ну наконец-то родили хоть что-то архитектурное.
ORDOS 100 #21: PRODUCTORA - at last something non-terrible. SFME(Sorry For My English) ^-^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ну наконец-то родили хоть что-то архитектурное.<br />
ORDOS 100 #21: PRODUCTORA &#8211; at last something non-terrible. SFME(Sorry For My English) ^-^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 11:53:11 by W3 Total Cache -->
