Dorobanti Tower, Bucharest / Zaha Hadid Architects

By — Filed under: Skyscrapers ,Structures , , ,
 

Dorobanti tower, a new project  by Zaha Hadid Architects in Bucharest moves away from the works we  have been seen lately, with a very expressive structure. The 200m tall iconic tower will be located in the heart of the capital city of  , at junction of Calea Dorobanti and St. Mihail Eminescu, with over 100,000 sqm for mixed-use development which include a 5-star hotel (with restaurants and convention centre), luxury apartments and retail space at street level.

The chamfered diamond like structure  tapers from the centre towards the top and the bottom. The meandering structural mesh expresses the change of programs across the tower.

A good move by Zaha in my opinion.

More on the structure, from :

Concrete filled steel profiles follow in sinus waves from the ground level to the top of the tower, creating a distinctive identity and complementing the tower design. The concrete filling will give additional strength to the structure and it will provide fire protection to the steel profiles. The facade structure adjusts to the building programme and to the structural forces. At the bottom, the façade grid has denser amplitudes according to the structural requirements for a tower of this height, providing the required load bearing capacity and stiffness to the structure. At the technical and recreation levels, the structure condenses creating almost solid knots. Additionally, the secondary structure supports the main steel frames. It also gives the 200m tower a human scale as the grid of the secondary frame structure reflects the floor heights. Furthermore, the secondary structure could be utilized to support additional glass panels as a shading device.

 
 
Thumb up Thumb down 0
as it is says:

in my oppinion they just recently started to do more realistic proposals, because of economical pressure; they finally want to actually build something

 
# February 18, 2009 at 15:47
Thumb up Thumb down 0
David says:

and what the hell is this?totally empy, here is no architecture in it, no art, no passion, no vision, just fashion. fake.

 
# February 18, 2009 at 15:58
Thumb up Thumb down 0
bogdan says:

you call THAT “realistic” proposal? Bucarest will NEVER build something like this…

 
# February 18, 2009 at 16:00
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Met says:

Nice perfume bottle.

 
# February 18, 2009 at 17:07
Thumb up Thumb down 0
m says:

Seems like they only designed a facede, and even that’s ugly and pointless. Just another design straigt from experimental 3D modeling…
Oh, and isn’t the concrete supposed to go around the steel in order to give it additional fire-resistance or does this work in both ways?

 
# February 18, 2009 at 18:44
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    cubic says:

    the facade design is interesting but would be totally disgusting in steel. I agree that concrete should cover the steel or create it obly from concrete. Steel would be only for the “fashion”? ugly.
    Besides the tower rises from nowhere,so close to the small buldings… without integrating the landscape, without any public open space.
    I would love to see another version of it, at least not to dissapoint people who like her work as I do. anyway, there’s no chance that this could be built now in Bucharest.

     
    # August 17, 2010 at 09:59
Thumb up Thumb down 0
pedja says:

my grandma’ does nicer hand-made art work than this lady hadid

 
# February 18, 2009 at 19:39
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Peng says:

looks like a corn…

 
# February 18, 2009 at 21:00
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Opium says:

Architectural terrorism. But then again bucharest is used to this kind of thing.May i remind you all of the beautiful palace built by ceausescu…i think this one will top that.

 
# February 18, 2009 at 21:02
Thumb up Thumb down 0
MZKDA says:

Hermoso!

 
# February 19, 2009 at 00:39
Thumb up Thumb down 0

YAAAAWN.

By the looks of it, this ‘realistic’ proposal is still grossly difficult to build and extraordinarily tricky to draw.

Every floorplate will be different and there is very little repetition in the facade modules, maybe one type for each level ?

These are tough times, this kind of stuff is not gonna fly.

 
# February 19, 2009 at 03:51
Thumb up Thumb down 0
David says:

ZAHA is DEAD, and maybe always has been… what a …

 
# February 19, 2009 at 08:18
Thumb up Thumb down 0
hj says:

what a nice stocking-covered dildo, the structure is probably to enhance the stimulation while inserting.

 
# February 19, 2009 at 09:05
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tanja says:

    Exactly!

     
    # November 7, 2009 at 08:46
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    MCT says:

    excellent

     
    # January 19, 2010 at 15:02
Thumb up Thumb down 0
zEro says:

Well, at least she moved one from past work, that’s a start!

 
# February 19, 2009 at 10:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
sisifo says:

another dildo building. i dont like it at all.

 
# February 19, 2009 at 10:57
Thumb up Thumb down 0
NMiller says:

Zaha stretched and tore her stockings one morning in preparation for her day at the office… EUREKA! A TOWER SKIN IDEA!

 
# February 19, 2009 at 13:35
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Mircea says:

Another slap in the face for Bucharest. This time really hard.

 
# February 19, 2009 at 14:18
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Mr.B says:

she deffinitely moved from past work, but in my opinion, this dosen’t really fit in the landscape. she’s like a machine

 
# February 19, 2009 at 14:25
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Laura says:

    Apparently she has no idea where the building was gonna be set :))

     
    # December 14, 2009 at 16:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Wyatt O'Day says:

Looks like a zeppo lighter… no?

 
# February 19, 2009 at 15:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
harz says:

why? They usually do projects without any meaning. But at least they usually have a beautifull approach. But this has nothing. It is meaningless.

 
# February 19, 2009 at 16:56
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Mr.B says:

i also think they projects dont have any meaning. they are just ment to be different by any means. of course, i might be wrong.

 
# February 19, 2009 at 18:04
Thumb up Thumb down 0
LuisCanela says:

looks like a shampoo bottle! dont like it at all!

 
# February 19, 2009 at 19:15
Thumb up Thumb down 0
tadas says:

silly coments form silly people.

 
# February 20, 2009 at 10:55
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    MCT says:

    and an almost useless comment from you. thanks

     
    # January 19, 2010 at 15:04
Thumb up Thumb down 0
andrei says:

It’s not only very ugly, it’s my opinion and we can discuss, but more than that, objectively a nonsens building, a new “fuckthecontext” one. How you know it’s Bucharest? Not a feeling, zero curiosity, supreme ignorence of genius locii… it’s a normal zaha hadid proposal, a shame.

 
# February 20, 2009 at 13:03
Thumb up Thumb down 0
flip says:

I LIKE THE CHANGE IN STRUCTURE FROM THE STREET LEVEL TO APEX. IT SHOWS THE STRUCTURAL LOAD OF THE BUILDING.. NICE..

 
# February 23, 2009 at 02:15
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    sinan says:

    shut up you engineer

     
    # August 19, 2011 at 13:54
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Jimmy Smith says:

Blogs like this is waht we blog addicts are looking for, will visit often.

 
# March 8, 2009 at 20:13
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Poulus says:

zaha hadid is a man…not a lady…
he just playing with the facade
that’s ok.

 
# April 10, 2009 at 18:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Benji says:

zaha hadid is a LADY. it’s you don’t even know who she is or what she does. what are you even doing here?

 
# April 26, 2009 at 14:12
Thumb up Thumb down 0
hayat says:

i used to “watch” zaha hadid, i like her projects usually.. but this one just doesn’t fits the “reality” of bucharest and it looks so weird, unattractive.. i do not like it.

 
# May 8, 2009 at 17:16
Thumb up Thumb down 0

For the past 10 years she used to mix product design with architecture !!!, someone should tell her the difference … for architecture and god sake
This shape could be good for anything except a building !!!

 
# May 30, 2009 at 17:25
Thumb up Thumb down 0
cosmina from bucharest says:

Well I think this is a nice object ( not necessary an architectural object). I can see in this article are presented only aerial perspectives. In that part of the Bucharest the streets are narrow, so any eye perspective of this very heigh building is a disaster. Context is denied here and the basic rules of the eye perspective are not used. This is an out of scale object for that site. Bucharest is not New York.

 
# July 30, 2009 at 04:17
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Diego F. says:

    What basic rules of the eye perspective?

     
    # November 7, 2009 at 22:14
Thumb up Thumb down 0
bus says:

In “Ferentari”, looks better….we need this tower…not food on the table…hehehehe

 
# August 28, 2009 at 12:23
Thumb up Thumb down 0
khalouk says:

this tower not bad we needit here betwen us o look and see something it looks and higher than 6meter irepet we needit

 
# September 21, 2009 at 20:37
Thumb up Thumb down 0

Surely a sensual form and exuberant in nature… it would be great to see this project get built. Seems like it belongs in a star wars movie somehow, I actually like where her recent projects are going stylistically speaking, from the BMW factory to the Cairo towers, sure seem progressive. Nice project.

 
# September 21, 2009 at 22:22
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Martin says:

LoL more from habitual building drawer.

 
# November 6, 2009 at 21:00
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    hung says:

    vai

     
    # November 7, 2009 at 11:41
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Elmer says:

Bucharest needs a Haussmann to lay some real avenues and a massive expansion of its Metro system.

Then maybe consider high rise, though the declining efficiencies of more lifts and smaller floor plates means you can usually get a better result wit a lower tower.

This is ego; the client’s manifested by the architect.

 
# November 7, 2009 at 03:50
Thumb up Thumb down 0
claudia says:

voi toti bucuresteni stiti prea bine ce dezastru ar fi, cum cladirea asta nu se potriveste deloc in “context”, dat fiind ca bucurestiul are o gramada de cladiri micute comparativ cu acest turn, vechi, pline de istorie si decoratiuni
intrebarea este: asa ceva se va construi sau e doar o idee trecatoare? am auzit de proiect inca de anul trecut…

iar pentru ceilalti
i suggest that those who have never seen bucharest stop praising the huge hadid tower, it could never fit the landscape, but could successfully ruin it and turn our city into a kitsch… it is not even beautiful or special

 
# November 7, 2009 at 12:01
Thumb up Thumb down 0
robert says:

dak nu ati aflat intre timp..va spun eu acum, turnul ramane pe hartie…primaria a respins proiectul
this tower will remain on her computer only, the authorities rejected this project.
I personally like what zaha’s creating arround the world, I admire her courage:)

 
# November 9, 2009 at 09:56
Thumb up Thumb down 0
dertify says:

the hidenberg has plummeted to the ground!!
(fear and amazement)

And so has Zaha Hadid…

 
# November 9, 2009 at 12:46
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Rob says:

Well, at least one should Google an artist before one talks, but what ever. I think Zaha Hadid is a great artist, who dares to be visionary in a world where averege peaople try to blend in. She is one of the most talented architects alive today (professionally acclaimed too, by the way) and her courage, light aesthetics, and fluid forms make her one of a kind. Though there are quite a few artists with resembling designs, none come close to the demure shapes of Hadid buildings. And she is one artist that is constantly changing and evolving, not like ohers (no names attached here…). It is the single most important feature of an artist: it’s ability to evolve, and reinvent. Need more than that?

 
# December 14, 2009 at 15:42
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    MCT says:

    issue is architecture is not all about aesthetics, and overall look. most of us know how to use google. It is not only about form.

     
    # August 18, 2010 at 05:53
Thumb up Thumb down 0
NexSt says:

nice building, but this isn’t Zaha’s style. Maybe she changed her style, who knows.

 
# December 20, 2009 at 10:40
Thumb up Thumb down 0
trut says:

welcome to dubaicharest. or was it abudabucharest?

 
# November 17, 2011 at 06:24
Thumb up Thumb down 0

8:39 AM Jul 8th

Dorobanti Tower, Bucharest / Zaha Hadid Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/E7LiDaj via @archdaily

Thumb up Thumb down 0

9:40 PM Dec 29th

Dorobanti Tower, Bucharest / Zaha Hadid Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/YJ0Pr433 via @archdaily

Leave a Reply »

 

Latest Comments »

awful lighting, it seems the Hard Rock Cafe[+]
Ow nooooo, it’s the bastard child of Zaha Hadid and Santiago...[+]
Decoracion de Interiores on Casa Mar / Coleman-Davis Pagan Arquitectos
Very nice and modern design. It’s simple but it...[+]
Beautiful building with dreadful lighting.[+]
Wow, I would love to be able to publicly kiss in this airport.[+]

Upcoming Architecture Events »

got events? invite us! click here

Architecture Books & Magazines »

Louis Vuitton Architecture and Interiors / Frederic Edelmann, Ian Luna, Rafael Magrou and Mohsen Mostafavi

Louis Vuitton Architecture and Interiors / Frederic Edelmann, Ian Luna, Rafael Magrou and Mohsen Mostafavi

“In the more recent past, it is the architecture of minimalism that has provided the most explicit and significant contribution to the reciprocal relationship between fashion and architecture. In many ways the abstraction and literal emptiness of minimalism has…

 

Steven Ehrlich Houses

Steven Ehrlich Houses

We recently had the pleasure of having Steven Ehrlich visit our office and give a talk about his work. He is as personable as his work is fascinating. He left us with a recently published book of his work…

 

Strategy Space / a+t: Landscape Urbanism Strategies

Strategy Space / a+t: Landscape Urbanism Strategies

Landscape Urbanism is the new black in architecture and this magazine, part of a+t strategy series, has heads turning. There are a dozen projects and hundreds of ideas in this edition. A recurring them is the manipulation of time…

 

Our partners »

AD on iPad via Pulse

Browse by date »

Browse by category »

Friends »