<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avant Chelsea / 1100 Architect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:24:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: diego</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-33508</link>
		<dc:creator>diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-33508</guid>
		<description>esto no propone nada de nada, lindos colores en la medianera y nada mas... porque no hay fotos del otro lado?arquteictura de imagen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>esto no propone nada de nada, lindos colores en la medianera y nada mas&#8230; porque no hay fotos del otro lado?arquteictura de imagen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viniruski</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-29487</link>
		<dc:creator>viniruski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-29487</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care how good the plans are.  Campy contrapuntal wall panel patterns always ruin a project.  It&#039;s an eyesore of trend of the latter half of the 2000s that we&#039;ll have to live with. We&#039;ll see it and always reminisce about the dark times:  Hey that&#039;s the style of architecture when the profession boomed due to the greed and corruption of Wall St.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care how good the plans are.  Campy contrapuntal wall panel patterns always ruin a project.  It&#8217;s an eyesore of trend of the latter half of the 2000s that we&#8217;ll have to live with. We&#8217;ll see it and always reminisce about the dark times:  Hey that&#8217;s the style of architecture when the profession boomed due to the greed and corruption of Wall St.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heartburn Home Remedy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-25066</link>
		<dc:creator>Heartburn Home Remedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-25066</guid>
		<description>Not that I&#039;m impressed a lot, but this is   more than I expected   when I found a link on Delicious telling that the info here is awesome. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I&#8217;m impressed a lot, but this is   more than I expected   when I found a link on Delicious telling that the info here is awesome. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sullka</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19500</link>
		<dc:creator>sullka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19500</guid>
		<description>What I wonder if they own the building next door next door.

If not, in the future, whenever they decide to make a higher buidling there, you&#039;re not only going to lose that lateral facade work, but also the openings at the last floor. I don&#039;t know how they let them put windows on that side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I wonder if they own the building next door next door.</p>
<p>If not, in the future, whenever they decide to make a higher buidling there, you&#8217;re not only going to lose that lateral facade work, but also the openings at the last floor. I don&#8217;t know how they let them put windows on that side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yiz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19343</link>
		<dc:creator>yiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19343</guid>
		<description>I have no idea why this kind of project can get publish in this website. it is totally uninspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea why this kind of project can get publish in this website. it is totally uninspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19305</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19305</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just love to know why we only get to see the same angle with the off-putting &#039;digital mosaic&#039; for the exterior shots... would have loved to have seen the seemingly interesting space where that gap is... floor plans are decent enough/ think I conconcted something similar during 1st year studio for fun  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just love to know why we only get to see the same angle with the off-putting &#8216;digital mosaic&#8217; for the exterior shots&#8230; would have loved to have seen the seemingly interesting space where that gap is&#8230; floor plans are decent enough/ think I conconcted something similar during 1st year studio for fun  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19225</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19225</guid>
		<description>I am curious on how the interior spaces read...I can kind of get that through the plans, but the exterior details leave me to believe that it is more of a one-liner building with little to back it up once you get past the explosion design on the side of the building.


Though I will say, it is an example of how one can deal with a blank facade that has to happen on a building like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious on how the interior spaces read&#8230;I can kind of get that through the plans, but the exterior details leave me to believe that it is more of a one-liner building with little to back it up once you get past the explosion design on the side of the building.</p>
<p>Though I will say, it is an example of how one can deal with a blank facade that has to happen on a building like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lite</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19132</link>
		<dc:creator>Lite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19132</guid>
		<description>Ok folks, 
Architecture is not meant to pursuit the new, architecture is meant to give good solution for a given problem.
Having said that, i think that the build is ok ... nothing extraordinary, but the plans are still ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok folks,<br />
Architecture is not meant to pursuit the new, architecture is meant to give good solution for a given problem.<br />
Having said that, i think that the build is ok &#8230; nothing extraordinary, but the plans are still ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odris</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19119</link>
		<dc:creator>odris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19119</guid>
		<description>i think the same miguel sa
nothing new</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the same miguel sa<br />
nothing new</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Sá, Arqt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19105</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Sá, Arqt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19105</guid>
		<description>I do not think that brings nothing new

não me parece que traga nada de novo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think that brings nothing new</p>
<p>não me parece que traga nada de novo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
