<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avant Chelsea / 1100 Architect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizky</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-913173</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-913173</guid>
		<description>ughhh I hate it, that side with the mozaic thing (is it a pixelated image of a galaxy?) really destroys the whole thing. The windows on that side also.......... whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ughhh I hate it, that side with the mozaic thing (is it a pixelated image of a galaxy?) really destroys the whole thing. The windows on that side also&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: internautas</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-201729</link>
		<dc:creator>internautas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-201729</guid>
		<description>Its not architecture. It&#039;s decoration...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not architecture. It&#8217;s decoration&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diego</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-33508</link>
		<dc:creator>diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-33508</guid>
		<description>esto no propone nada de nada, lindos colores en la medianera y nada mas... porque no hay fotos del otro lado?arquteictura de imagen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>esto no propone nada de nada, lindos colores en la medianera y nada mas&#8230; porque no hay fotos del otro lado?arquteictura de imagen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viniruski</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-29487</link>
		<dc:creator>viniruski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-29487</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care how good the plans are.  Campy contrapuntal wall panel patterns always ruin a project.  It&#039;s an eyesore of trend of the latter half of the 2000s that we&#039;ll have to live with. We&#039;ll see it and always reminisce about the dark times:  Hey that&#039;s the style of architecture when the profession boomed due to the greed and corruption of Wall St.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care how good the plans are.  Campy contrapuntal wall panel patterns always ruin a project.  It&#8217;s an eyesore of trend of the latter half of the 2000s that we&#8217;ll have to live with. We&#8217;ll see it and always reminisce about the dark times:  Hey that&#8217;s the style of architecture when the profession boomed due to the greed and corruption of Wall St.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heartburn Home Remedy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-25066</link>
		<dc:creator>Heartburn Home Remedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-25066</guid>
		<description>Not that I&#039;m impressed a lot, but this is   more than I expected   when I found a link on Delicious telling that the info here is awesome. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I&#8217;m impressed a lot, but this is   more than I expected   when I found a link on Delicious telling that the info here is awesome. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sullka</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19500</link>
		<dc:creator>sullka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19500</guid>
		<description>What I wonder if they own the building next door next door.

If not, in the future, whenever they decide to make a higher buidling there, you&#039;re not only going to lose that lateral facade work, but also the openings at the last floor. I don&#039;t know how they let them put windows on that side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I wonder if they own the building next door next door.</p>
<p>If not, in the future, whenever they decide to make a higher buidling there, you&#8217;re not only going to lose that lateral facade work, but also the openings at the last floor. I don&#8217;t know how they let them put windows on that side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yiz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19343</link>
		<dc:creator>yiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19343</guid>
		<description>I have no idea why this kind of project can get publish in this website. it is totally uninspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea why this kind of project can get publish in this website. it is totally uninspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19305</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19305</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just love to know why we only get to see the same angle with the off-putting &#039;digital mosaic&#039; for the exterior shots... would have loved to have seen the seemingly interesting space where that gap is... floor plans are decent enough/ think I conconcted something similar during 1st year studio for fun  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just love to know why we only get to see the same angle with the off-putting &#8216;digital mosaic&#8217; for the exterior shots&#8230; would have loved to have seen the seemingly interesting space where that gap is&#8230; floor plans are decent enough/ think I conconcted something similar during 1st year studio for fun  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19225</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19225</guid>
		<description>I am curious on how the interior spaces read...I can kind of get that through the plans, but the exterior details leave me to believe that it is more of a one-liner building with little to back it up once you get past the explosion design on the side of the building.


Though I will say, it is an example of how one can deal with a blank facade that has to happen on a building like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious on how the interior spaces read&#8230;I can kind of get that through the plans, but the exterior details leave me to believe that it is more of a one-liner building with little to back it up once you get past the explosion design on the side of the building.</p>
<p>Though I will say, it is an example of how one can deal with a blank facade that has to happen on a building like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lite</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19132</link>
		<dc:creator>Lite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19132</guid>
		<description>Ok folks, 
Architecture is not meant to pursuit the new, architecture is meant to give good solution for a given problem.
Having said that, i think that the build is ok ... nothing extraordinary, but the plans are still ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok folks,<br />
Architecture is not meant to pursuit the new, architecture is meant to give good solution for a given problem.<br />
Having said that, i think that the build is ok &#8230; nothing extraordinary, but the plans are still ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odris</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19119</link>
		<dc:creator>odris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19119</guid>
		<description>i think the same miguel sa
nothing new</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the same miguel sa<br />
nothing new</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Sá, Arqt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19105</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Sá, Arqt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19105</guid>
		<description>I do not think that brings nothing new

não me parece que traga nada de novo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think that brings nothing new</p>
<p>não me parece que traga nada de novo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joaquin cabral</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19093</link>
		<dc:creator>joaquin cabral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19093</guid>
		<description>is just another son of the standarized residential architecture of New York. I don´t see any contribution of this architecture... and the mosaic... just a fart that made this possible to be published</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is just another son of the standarized residential architecture of New York. I don´t see any contribution of this architecture&#8230; and the mosaic&#8230; just a fart that made this possible to be published</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19086</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19086</guid>
		<description>There are no photos from across the street or from the west because those views of the building reveal that it is really uninpired architecture.  1100 Architect does nice work, this just isn&#039;t their best effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no photos from across the street or from the west because those views of the building reveal that it is really uninpired architecture.  1100 Architect does nice work, this just isn&#8217;t their best effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19039</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19039</guid>
		<description>...and why aren&#039;t there photos from the other end of the street?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and why aren&#8217;t there photos from the other end of the street?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19028</link>
		<dc:creator>guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19028</guid>
		<description>1960&#039;s revisited - in the worst possible way. looks kinda cheap. who would want architecture like that in their city?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1960&#8242;s revisited &#8211; in the worst possible way. looks kinda cheap. who would want architecture like that in their city?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19027</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19027</guid>
		<description>A primitive one to one photoshop filter-cum-facade design. Reminds me of the 70&#039;s ugly mosaic work. Unfortunate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A primitive one to one photoshop filter-cum-facade design. Reminds me of the 70&#8242;s ugly mosaic work. Unfortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19024</link>
		<dc:creator>One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19024</guid>
		<description>This one reminds me of OMA&#039;s apartment building project in NYC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one reminds me of OMA&#8217;s apartment building project in NYC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19020</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19020</guid>
		<description>Who wants to have a veiw of the side of a building... Good dissolve concept though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who wants to have a veiw of the side of a building&#8230; Good dissolve concept though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14674/avant-chelsea-1100-architect/#comment-19019</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14674#comment-19019</guid>
		<description>view of the side of the building? good dissolving concept though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>view of the side of the building? good dissolving concept though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 12:15:03 by W3 Total Cache -->
