Support on the -- Click here to nominate us for Best Online Magazine!Close
Have you seen our interviews in High Definition?

Avant Chelsea / 1100 Architect

By Nico Saieh — Filed under: Housing , Selected , , ,
 

Architect: 1100 Architect
Location: New York, USA
Principal: Juergen Riehm, David Piscuskas
Project Architect: Christine Harper
Project Managers: Bo Lee, Sebastian Kaempf
Designer: Jessica Spiegel
MEP Engineer: ESC Consulting Engineers
Structural Engineer: Robert Silman Associates
General Contractor: Hunter Roberts Construction Group
Exterior Consultant: Israel Berger
Project Year: 2008
Constructed Area: 2,973 sqm
Photographs: Sebastian Kaempf, Lisa Bubbers

The city elicits in our culture a stark duality – a desire to be immersed in its spectacle and a simultaneous craving for respite from its ceaseless activity. Avant Chelsea will provide for its residents both experiences. A modern, culturally sophisticated urbanite requires access to constantly shifting stimulation as well as a private space that can be adapted to their personal needs and sensibility.

This new condominium in West Chelsea will contain twelve floors of flexible apartments, upper-floor terraces, recreation areas, and a courtyard. The street façade is a window wall, skillfully proportioned to achieve a balance between the scale of the user and the building at large. The design is efficient with a refined elegance.

 

18 comments »

Brandon says:

view of the side of the building? good dissolving concept though.

 
# March 11, 2009 at 03:00
Brandon says:

Who wants to have a veiw of the side of a building… Good dissolve concept though.

 
# March 11, 2009 at 03:01
One says:

This one reminds me of OMA’s apartment building project in NYC…

 
# March 11, 2009 at 03:30
jon says:

A primitive one to one photoshop filter-cum-facade design. Reminds me of the 70’s ugly mosaic work. Unfortunate.

 
# March 11, 2009 at 04:05
guy says:

1960’s revisited – in the worst possible way. looks kinda cheap. who would want architecture like that in their city?

 
# March 11, 2009 at 04:24
jon says:

…and why aren’t there photos from the other end of the street?

 
# March 11, 2009 at 05:18
Glen says:

There are no photos from across the street or from the west because those views of the building reveal that it is really uninpired architecture. 1100 Architect does nice work, this just isn’t their best effort.

 
# March 11, 2009 at 09:08
joaquin cabral says:

is just another son of the standarized residential architecture of New York. I don´t see any contribution of this architecture… and the mosaic… just a fart that made this possible to be published

 
# March 11, 2009 at 09:47

I do not think that brings nothing new

não me parece que traga nada de novo

 
# March 11, 2009 at 10:44
odris says:

i think the same miguel sa
nothing new

 
# March 11, 2009 at 11:12
Lite says:

Ok folks,
Architecture is not meant to pursuit the new, architecture is meant to give good solution for a given problem.
Having said that, i think that the build is ok … nothing extraordinary, but the plans are still ok.

 
# March 11, 2009 at 12:32
dennis says:

I am curious on how the interior spaces read…I can kind of get that through the plans, but the exterior details leave me to believe that it is more of a one-liner building with little to back it up once you get past the explosion design on the side of the building.

Though I will say, it is an example of how one can deal with a blank facade that has to happen on a building like this.

 
# March 11, 2009 at 23:33
Georgia says:

I’d just love to know why we only get to see the same angle with the off-putting ‘digital mosaic’ for the exterior shots… would have loved to have seen the seemingly interesting space where that gap is… floor plans are decent enough/ think I conconcted something similar during 1st year studio for fun ;)

 
# March 12, 2009 at 09:20
yiz says:

I have no idea why this kind of project can get publish in this website. it is totally uninspiring.

 
# March 12, 2009 at 12:54
sullka says:

What I wonder if they own the building next door next door.

If not, in the future, whenever they decide to make a higher buidling there, you’re not only going to lose that lateral facade work, but also the openings at the last floor. I don’t know how they let them put windows on that side.

 
# March 13, 2009 at 12:12

Not that I’m impressed a lot, but this is more than I expected when I found a link on Delicious telling that the info here is awesome. Thanks.

 
# April 15, 2009 at 07:18
viniruski says:

I don’t care how good the plans are. Campy contrapuntal wall panel patterns always ruin a project. It’s an eyesore of trend of the latter half of the 2000s that we’ll have to live with. We’ll see it and always reminisce about the dark times: Hey that’s the style of architecture when the profession boomed due to the greed and corruption of Wall St.

 
# May 7, 2009 at 14:26
diego says:

esto no propone nada de nada, lindos colores en la medianera y nada mas… porque no hay fotos del otro lado?arquteictura de imagen…

 
# May 26, 2009 at 20:41

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

fantastic[+]
Looks like a squid.[+]
sigh. projects like this make me question why i’m...[+]
Absolutely horrendous.[+]
maybe it always has been ! just more out there now[+]
thats how everything seems to be nowadays. I think...[+]
I agree with you, there is much to like about...[+]
I find it really curious that critique has become so...[+]
Great! What are the dimensions of each floor? No...[+]
construction detail 1:10?[+]
any possibility of seeing some wall construction...[+]
Very fun. And to put the bathroom beneath the former...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »