Comments on: In Progress: Z Towers / NRJA http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/ Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Reda http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-192713 Reda Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:33:43 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-192713 Exactly! What is this anyway?... At the heart of Riga, awful... Exactly! What is this anyway?… At the heart of Riga, awful…

]]> By: pinky http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-73233 pinky Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:09:24 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-73233 this is far away from looking like petronas tower.. why?.. only because its two linked towers? this is far away from looking like petronas tower.. why?.. only because its two linked towers?

]]> By: temple http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16700 temple Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:05:45 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16700 show me plans please visualizations cannot tell me about your architecture anything :) show me plans please visualizations cannot tell me about your architecture anything :)

]]> By: Ork http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16569 Ork Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:16:17 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16569 such a darkest utopia for Baltic states such a darkest utopia for Baltic states

]]> By: Ork http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16568 Ork Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:14:19 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16568 Another clone Another clone

]]> By: chicago.g http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16566 chicago.g Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:58:35 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16566 i would like to ask why some of the comments have been deleted? it happened to me for a couple of times already, as well as to some guys too. i would like to ask why some of the comments have been deleted? it happened to me for a couple of times already, as well as to some guys too.

]]> By: David http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16543 David Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:16:11 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16543 Riga deservs more! Riga deservs more!

]]> By: Amanda http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16488 Amanda Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:47:56 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16488 You guys are so mean You guys are so mean

]]> By: Mal genio http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16480 Mal genio Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:05:21 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16480 Am I the only one that think this project as a Tiny Toon version of the Petronas Towers? Anyway, if I am the only one, I still think this looks old and boring and unsophisticated (if that is a word) and... many baaaad things. That's all I wanted to say about it Am I the only one that think this project as a Tiny Toon version of the Petronas Towers?

Anyway, if I am the only one, I still think this looks old and boring and unsophisticated (if that is a word) and… many baaaad things.

That’s all I wanted to say about it

]]> By: delay http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16477 delay Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:39:38 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16477 this project is stopped because of fiancial problems as far as i now. beside that i am not the biggest friend of littering up the pardaugava side of riga with such a boring and already seen architecture! this project is stopped because of fiancial problems as far as i now.
beside that i am not the biggest friend of littering up the pardaugava side of riga with such a
boring and already seen architecture!

]]> By: chicago.g http://www.archdaily.com/14345/in-progress-z-towers-nrja/#comment-16440 chicago.g Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:09:26 +0000 http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14345#comment-16440 what is the point here? does not seem very interesting. perhaps something special with the CW detail? what is the point here? does not seem very interesting. perhaps something special with the CW detail?

]]>