<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:16:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: loosman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-152993</link>
		<dc:creator>loosman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-152993</guid>
		<description>it looks peaceful and ordered - well done bow wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks peaceful and ordered &#8211; well done bow wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banc</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-152972</link>
		<dc:creator>Banc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-152972</guid>
		<description>The arches are too small to be comfortable... it seems like a terribly chaotic space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arches are too small to be comfortable&#8230; it seems like a terribly chaotic space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mounir</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-56710</link>
		<dc:creator>Mounir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-56710</guid>
		<description>This reminding me of islamic / historic architecture of the teen centuries..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminding me of islamic / historic architecture of the teen centuries..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daidalos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-17066</link>
		<dc:creator>daidalos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-17066</guid>
		<description>Katsudon, a couple of friendly remarks: i like the intention for openness to the landscape but i don`t see any cave like spaces there. i just think that they did not spend enough time in it to get it to a level of sophistication or ...architecture. They are trying to do something with the spacings of the columns as it can be seen in plan but judging from the images at the moment it is not very interesting to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katsudon, a couple of friendly remarks: i like the intention for openness to the landscape but i don`t see any cave like spaces there. i just think that they did not spend enough time in it to get it to a level of sophistication or &#8230;architecture. They are trying to do something with the spacings of the columns as it can be seen in plan but judging from the images at the moment it is not very interesting to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Added to a feed: ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow &#124; Arch Daily &#124; hj barraza</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-17015</link>
		<dc:creator>Added to a feed: ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow &#124; Arch Daily &#124; hj barraza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-17015</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow &#124; Arch Daily. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow | Arch Daily. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katsudon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16961</link>
		<dc:creator>Katsudon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16961</guid>
		<description>That was my first reaction too. But to me the comparison even obvious stops here. This looks like a good job, and i like the intention about the natural like flooding into a cave-like environnement. I guess that should give a nice fresh feeling at least to the eyes during summer.
Daidalos&gt; Maybe because those arches are made to look like cutout crossing panels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my first reaction too. But to me the comparison even obvious stops here. This looks like a good job, and i like the intention about the natural like flooding into a cave-like environnement. I guess that should give a nice fresh feeling at least to the eyes during summer.<br />
Daidalos&gt; Maybe because those arches are made to look like cutout crossing panels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daidalos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16960</link>
		<dc:creator>daidalos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16960</guid>
		<description>Anyway apart from the arches the whole proposal is so vague in how it will actualise &#039;to generate a condition that can support a new type of luxurious mixed-lifestyle living for our generation&#039;. No actual interior and no shadows to hide away from the sun in such a harsh environment, very anti-byzantine indeed. Structurally it is not ambitious as the spans are very modest which will in time impact the adaptabillity of the scheme. Bottomline i would definitely not pay for it and not just because of the accidental arches which i actually don`t mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway apart from the arches the whole proposal is so vague in how it will actualise &#8216;to generate a condition that can support a new type of luxurious mixed-lifestyle living for our generation&#8217;. No actual interior and no shadows to hide away from the sun in such a harsh environment, very anti-byzantine indeed. Structurally it is not ambitious as the spans are very modest which will in time impact the adaptabillity of the scheme. Bottomline i would definitely not pay for it and not just because of the accidental arches which i actually don`t mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daidalos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16957</link>
		<dc:creator>daidalos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16957</guid>
		<description>What are you people saying then, that whoever does an arch from now on references Ito and not the 3000 years of architecture tradition, east or west!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you people saying then, that whoever does an arch from now on references Ito and not the 3000 years of architecture tradition, east or west!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16955</link>
		<dc:creator>One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16955</guid>
		<description>Bow wow rips Ito off in China! indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bow wow rips Ito off in China! indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow &#124; Arch Daily &#124; Concretismo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16935</link>
		<dc:creator>ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow &#124; Arch Daily &#124; Concretismo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16935</guid>
		<description>[...]  ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow &#124; Arch Daily. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  ORDOS 100 #20: Atelier Bow Wow | Arch Daily. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vico</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16925</link>
		<dc:creator>Vico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16925</guid>
		<description>An absolutist space designed around a grid with little concession made to variations in human activity: should we consider this as anything but deadpan modernism? 

Ito&#039;s library (he deserves a royalty cut) was a much more nuanced take on the empirical grid, with the arches arrayed on radiating lines and thereby distorting the view through the main space, compressing or opening up perspectives like a fish-eye lens.

Atelier Bow Wow are clearly infinitely better architects when constrained by context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An absolutist space designed around a grid with little concession made to variations in human activity: should we consider this as anything but deadpan modernism? </p>
<p>Ito&#8217;s library (he deserves a royalty cut) was a much more nuanced take on the empirical grid, with the arches arrayed on radiating lines and thereby distorting the view through the main space, compressing or opening up perspectives like a fish-eye lens.</p>
<p>Atelier Bow Wow are clearly infinitely better architects when constrained by context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sisifo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16912</link>
		<dc:creator>sisifo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16912</guid>
		<description>i rally like atelier bow wow.........but not anymore with this project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i rally like atelier bow wow&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;but not anymore with this project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Hey Cam L. Ink Refinery</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16898</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Hey Cam L. Ink Refinery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16898</guid>
		<description>[...] When I can afford to pay you to design my house, I want it to look like this and this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When I can afford to pay you to design my house, I want it to look like this and this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Pass</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16885</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Pass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16885</guid>
		<description>All the comments on the Ito-esque nature of the space....I guess so.  but the fact that there are references...literally...to WESTERN architecture seem to be overlooked.  Western (American &amp; European) architects emulate Japanese vernacular countless times with their failed attempts at delicate wood structures with bamboo (or the 2x4 US equivalent) of a &#039;screen&#039;.  I have no problems with the proposed building....in fact find it exponentially more successful than the Ito project.  The Ito project (if you look closely) is not benefiting from true arch or vaulting action.  it is a mockery of a TRADITIONAL construction method. At least Bow-Wow embraces the physics of the arch and makes no effort to hide its Byzantine influence.  

I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the comments on the Ito-esque nature of the space&#8230;.I guess so.  but the fact that there are references&#8230;literally&#8230;to WESTERN architecture seem to be overlooked.  Western (American &amp; European) architects emulate Japanese vernacular countless times with their failed attempts at delicate wood structures with bamboo (or the 2&#215;4 US equivalent) of a &#8216;screen&#8217;.  I have no problems with the proposed building&#8230;.in fact find it exponentially more successful than the Ito project.  The Ito project (if you look closely) is not benefiting from true arch or vaulting action.  it is a mockery of a TRADITIONAL construction method. At least Bow-Wow embraces the physics of the arch and makes no effort to hide its Byzantine influence.  </p>
<p>I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16878</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16878</guid>
		<description>Reminds me spacewise of islamic architecture. Despite the obvious references to Toyo Ito or Akihisa Hirata and their use of paper like concrete walls I find this type of architecture much more appropriate than many of the other buildings that have been shown so far...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me spacewise of islamic architecture. Despite the obvious references to Toyo Ito or Akihisa Hirata and their use of paper like concrete walls I find this type of architecture much more appropriate than many of the other buildings that have been shown so far&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: island</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16867</link>
		<dc:creator>island</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16867</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fashion style of design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fashion style of design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaffilaura</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16861</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaffilaura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16861</guid>
		<description>I know. This is the Tama Art University Library moved to mongolia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know. This is the Tama Art University Library moved to mongolia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: as it is</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/14243/ordos-100-20-atelier-bow-wow/#comment-16856</link>
		<dc:creator>as it is</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=14243#comment-16856</guid>
		<description>this is sooo toyo ito</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is sooo toyo ito</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 12:25:03 by W3 Total Cache -->
