Comments on: ORDOS 100 #18: I|K Studio

By: rue

rue — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:57:52 +0000

its preferably adviced for any showroom or an outlet.. not for residencial purpose….what you thnk mil?

By: rue

rue — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:55:06 +0000

well.its really a creative one.i really liked it alot. the way to give practicality in it ios awsome,…

By: claude

claude — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:08:54 +0000

would you raise your kids and live im such a space?

By: mil

mil — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:08:44 +0000

More and more shapes without meaning…….. whitout funtional concepts……… all is exterior…. looks like out of season shop…….. were is the modern home identity here………

please mister arquitects think a little more in people and less in playboys.

By: ORDOS 100 lote 55 | I|K studio | TOTONKO

ORDOS 100 lote 55 | I|K studio | TOTONKO — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:23:44 +0000

[...] vía [...]

By: JCC

JCC — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:17:25 +0000

I completely agree with Bo

By: Bo

Bo — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:58:32 +0000

Уж извините, но эта хрень начинает раздражать, что не дом, то мятая безвкусная коробка.

By: Creator

Creator — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:58:02 +0000

tchouah – our architecture also can have evolution.And landscape,geographic terrain,environment etc…. and organic forms are two different things.

By: DM_A

DM_A — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:14:18 +0000

tchouah says: “In nature, organical structures have their laws and still stay all différents. But nothing’s arbitrary, it’s all about evolution.
Building are artificial.”

I disagree in the last point. I tend to think it this way: Human beings are part of Nature, I think it’s a huge mistake to put ourselves apart/beyond Nature and its rules. So, as part of it, everything we do/build is part of it too.
A bird’s nest is artificial? I don’t think so. So why a “human nest” is considered artificial?

It’s all about evolution, as you said. So if we humans evolve, so do our products, don’t you think?

By: tchouah

tchouah — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:02:04 +0000

Nature abey to some very simples laws, gravity symetrie(sometimes) …etc
In nature, organical structures have their laws and still stay all différents. But nothing’s arbitrary, it’s all about evolution.

Building are artificial.
What are building laws?
Imite nature?
Easy to build?
Emotions ?
Rationality?

By: Andy Marshall

Andy Marshall — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:01:42 +0000

4-2-1 House China Contemporary bifurcated res by IIK Studio 2009 http://bit.ly/vs0Wi #pevstweet

By: flip

flip — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:58:36 +0000

i think the pool area is similar to libeskind’s westside mall..

By: Creator

Creator — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:35:48 +0000

For me this house is with fantastic shape and I like it.For folding and arbitary i can say one thing – our planet surface looks arbitary with its foldings but we live on it and like it :)

By: DM_A

DM_A — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:52:58 +0000

Well, but…arbitrary? What’s not arbitrary in architecture?
I mean…who said a straight angle is not arbitrary? I think, in fact, that orthogonal geometry is quite more abstract and hard to find in nature (even crystals, the most perfect geometries in nature aren’t perfectly squared, but complex combinations of angles). So, it’s maybe a matter of “geometrical culture” … i’m just thinking aloud so we can discuss this deeply…
Anyway, I like this example, very elegant in its presentation, though I’d like to see it built to test it’s spaces.

By: provecho

provecho — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:17:25 +0000

I’m not a huge fan of the faceted architecture trend, but this example is quite elegant. Arbitrary, but elegant.