<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WAAS: Workshop Advanced Architectural Structures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: free police auction cars</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-251374</link>
		<dc:creator>free police auction cars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-251374</guid>
		<description>Thank You For This Blog, was added to my bookmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You For This Blog, was added to my bookmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Camps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-236040</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Camps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-236040</guid>
		<description>Maybe you could change the webpage subject WAAS: Workshop Advanced Architectural Structures &#124; ArchDaily to something more specific for your content you create. I loved the post withal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you could change the webpage subject WAAS: Workshop Advanced Architectural Structures | ArchDaily to something more specific for your content you create. I loved the post withal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-75308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-75308</guid>
		<description>This makes me remember something that my grandmother used to say...
But it is definitely inappropriate right this moment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes me remember something that my grandmother used to say&#8230;<br />
But it is definitely inappropriate right this moment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-75197</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-75197</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of something my cousin used to say...
Of course its definitely inappropriate right this moment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of something my cousin used to say&#8230;<br />
Of course its definitely inappropriate right this moment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-74998</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-74998</guid>
		<description>This makes me remember something funny that my mother would always say...
Obviously it is most likely not appropriate right this moment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes me remember something funny that my mother would always say&#8230;<br />
Obviously it is most likely not appropriate right this moment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonia Nicarry</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-27168</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonia Nicarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-27168</guid>
		<description>In searching for sites related to web hosting and specifically comparison hosting linux plan web, your site came up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In searching for sites related to web hosting and specifically comparison hosting linux plan web, your site came up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamudraMadhanaya</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-16001</link>
		<dc:creator>SamudraMadhanaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-16001</guid>
		<description>Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again - taking you feeds also, Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again &#8211; taking you feeds also, Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaitabasuraMardhanaya</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-15430</link>
		<dc:creator>KaitabasuraMardhanaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-15430</guid>
		<description>Wow! what an idea ! What a concept ! Beautiful .. Amazing </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! what an idea ! What a concept ! Beautiful .. Amazing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SriMathe</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-15423</link>
		<dc:creator>SriMathe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-15423</guid>
		<description>amazing stuff thanx :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazing stuff thanx :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Petsagourakis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-15046</link>
		<dc:creator>George Petsagourakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-15046</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify, in the last comment it is only the line with the emoticon I mean. I am not being serious about the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify, in the last comment it is only the line with the emoticon I mean. I am not being serious about the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Petsagourakis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-15044</link>
		<dc:creator>George Petsagourakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-15044</guid>
		<description>Agreed, any design can be built. ;)





OK people the design is over, the sum of the workshop is that we can built anything. Thanks for attending, cookies and tee across the street, for anyone interested.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, any design can be built. ;)</p>
<p>OK people the design is over, the sum of the workshop is that we can built anything. Thanks for attending, cookies and tee across the street, for anyone interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jhonnatan Hernández</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-15030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jhonnatan Hernández</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-15030</guid>
		<description>George, 

Both you and I know that the concept is everything when you initiate a project. It is the genesis...the birth of a structure, garment, furniture piece, art, photograph, whatever you want it to be.

If the concept is too much of something, it either ends there...it dies, or... it waits for someone who has the courage to accept a possible failure to have it executed. 

I personally think that any design can be built. Not saying it will be aesthetically pleasing, nor 100 % functional, however, when someone looks at architecture as an art of colossal proportions, that&#039;s where it is more appreciated, for its positive and negative critiques and reactions, its what makes a work memorable. 

I mean, if we&#039;re gonna end up talking about what is necessary and what isn&#039;t, lets all become cavemen and just grab rock slabs to have seating, trees and branches for our roofs and leaves for softer surfaces. Art and architecture should never be categorized as different things that have nothing to do with each other... I always say, Art is the liberal free-form conceptual side of design, and design the technical side of art. They go hand in hand, they should, if not...we&#039;d all be living in a veeeeery uncomfortable and boring world.

Then again...that&#039;s the aesthetic of some architects now, I guess it should just be left as a personal taste matter... 

-Jhonnatan, 20
Mexico</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, </p>
<p>Both you and I know that the concept is everything when you initiate a project. It is the genesis&#8230;the birth of a structure, garment, furniture piece, art, photograph, whatever you want it to be.</p>
<p>If the concept is too much of something, it either ends there&#8230;it dies, or&#8230; it waits for someone who has the courage to accept a possible failure to have it executed. </p>
<p>I personally think that any design can be built. Not saying it will be aesthetically pleasing, nor 100 % functional, however, when someone looks at architecture as an art of colossal proportions, that&#8217;s where it is more appreciated, for its positive and negative critiques and reactions, its what makes a work memorable. </p>
<p>I mean, if we&#8217;re gonna end up talking about what is necessary and what isn&#8217;t, lets all become cavemen and just grab rock slabs to have seating, trees and branches for our roofs and leaves for softer surfaces. Art and architecture should never be categorized as different things that have nothing to do with each other&#8230; I always say, Art is the liberal free-form conceptual side of design, and design the technical side of art. They go hand in hand, they should, if not&#8230;we&#8217;d all be living in a veeeeery uncomfortable and boring world.</p>
<p>Then again&#8230;that&#8217;s the aesthetic of some architects now, I guess it should just be left as a personal taste matter&#8230; </p>
<p>-Jhonnatan, 20<br />
Mexico</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Petsagourakis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-14762</link>
		<dc:creator>George Petsagourakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-14762</guid>
		<description>hehe... sounds like art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe&#8230; sounds like art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-14761</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-14761</guid>
		<description>:) nice quote, but Koolhaas has a great talent at repackaging clichés. Replace architecture by doctors, engineers or any other profession for that matter, even soldiers, and you will see that the “content” remains the same. He never attempts at creating any constructive solutions. Maintaining such a cynical position is in my opinion far too easy and in fact quite cowardice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:) nice quote, but Koolhaas has a great talent at repackaging clichés. Replace architecture by doctors, engineers or any other profession for that matter, even soldiers, and you will see that the “content” remains the same. He never attempts at creating any constructive solutions. Maintaining such a cynical position is in my opinion far too easy and in fact quite cowardice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Petsagourakis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator>George Petsagourakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-14727</guid>
		<description>Just a great quote that makes up for the whole thread of comments and my reactions in particular.

http://bit.ly/vTAq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a great quote that makes up for the whole thread of comments and my reactions in particular.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/vTAq" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/vTAq</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Petsagourakis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-14662</link>
		<dc:creator>George Petsagourakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-14662</guid>
		<description>Hello Nicolas, I just expressed my reaction to the seminar punchline. I never thought that Architecture must be what I think. 

Apart from that, I can recognize the two following realities. 1. Architecture is tied to the time, technicality, and resources factors that exist in the governing context. 
2.It is a means to move the world forward.

Too much talk too little done. 
It is Sunday everyone, go enjoy the sun ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Nicolas, I just expressed my reaction to the seminar punchline. I never thought that Architecture must be what I think. </p>
<p>Apart from that, I can recognize the two following realities. 1. Architecture is tied to the time, technicality, and resources factors that exist in the governing context.<br />
2.It is a means to move the world forward.</p>
<p>Too much talk too little done.<br />
It is Sunday everyone, go enjoy the sun ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Bet</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-14613</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Bet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-14613</guid>
		<description>Dear George, Architecture is beyond all moralities like yours. Sometimes the reasons for a building to be there can be supported on moral arguments. The pyramids is an example, or all those antique greek temples built for &quot;gods&quot; that doesn&#039;t exist (also with slaves) I mean, architecture almost always is a vehicle of the forces that rules the world, a vehicle for the powerful. Architecture always lays besides the money and the power. If an architect only thinks of that, is not going to build anything, and will stay most of it&#039;s career thinking and talking about that. Architecture IS NOT completely a social science. It may sound weird, but I&#039;m almost sure that most of architects wants to build something, and, to reach that, they have to think as architects, not like antropologists, o philosophers, etc. By the way, the question NEVER should be if a design &quot;should&quot; be built. The workshop seems to be amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear George, Architecture is beyond all moralities like yours. Sometimes the reasons for a building to be there can be supported on moral arguments. The pyramids is an example, or all those antique greek temples built for &#8220;gods&#8221; that doesn&#8217;t exist (also with slaves) I mean, architecture almost always is a vehicle of the forces that rules the world, a vehicle for the powerful. Architecture always lays besides the money and the power. If an architect only thinks of that, is not going to build anything, and will stay most of it&#8217;s career thinking and talking about that. Architecture IS NOT completely a social science. It may sound weird, but I&#8217;m almost sure that most of architects wants to build something, and, to reach that, they have to think as architects, not like antropologists, o philosophers, etc. By the way, the question NEVER should be if a design &#8220;should&#8221; be built. The workshop seems to be amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Basulto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-14591</link>
		<dc:creator>David Basulto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-14591</guid>
		<description>The image is a project by NOX, who will participate in this workshop with a lecture on scripting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image is a project by NOX, who will participate in this workshop with a lecture on scripting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Petsagourakis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-14455</link>
		<dc:creator>George Petsagourakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-14455</guid>
		<description>Sorry for commenting this again, but the image in the article is really outrageous. Not in the good way that delivers dialog and outcome, in the bad way, that gives me the possibility of not having a monitor for a couple of days.

Anyhow indeed Gerald, conservation under the terms you describe is a bad thing to do. Pardon me, the word should have been &quot;renovate&quot;. Misarticulations such as this come with the use of the second language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for commenting this again, but the image in the article is really outrageous. Not in the good way that delivers dialog and outcome, in the bad way, that gives me the possibility of not having a monitor for a couple of days.</p>
<p>Anyhow indeed Gerald, conservation under the terms you describe is a bad thing to do. Pardon me, the word should have been &#8220;renovate&#8221;. Misarticulations such as this come with the use of the second language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12796/waas-workshop-advanced-architectural-structures/#comment-14454</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12796#comment-14454</guid>
		<description>&quot;With all those environmental and economical difficulties we are for sure in need of conservation of what is already there.&quot;

The biggest energy and resource waster in most parts of the world is the existing urban fabric and the way we live in it. We need a hell of lot of intelligent design en mindset change to get us out of this mess. &quot;Conservation&quot; - meaning &quot;no change&quot; or &quot;a stand still&quot; - is the worst possible imaginable solution. 

The mindset behind &quot;generative and parametric design&quot; is a understanding and acceptance of complex systems of &quot;interrelationships&quot; and &quot;interdependencies&quot;. Key know how for developing a sustainable future. Therefore the collective intuitive interest in &quot;complexity&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With all those environmental and economical difficulties we are for sure in need of conservation of what is already there.&#8221;</p>
<p>The biggest energy and resource waster in most parts of the world is the existing urban fabric and the way we live in it. We need a hell of lot of intelligent design en mindset change to get us out of this mess. &#8220;Conservation&#8221; &#8211; meaning &#8220;no change&#8221; or &#8220;a stand still&#8221; &#8211; is the worst possible imaginable solution. </p>
<p>The mindset behind &#8220;generative and parametric design&#8221; is a understanding and acceptance of complex systems of &#8220;interrelationships&#8221; and &#8220;interdependencies&#8221;. Key know how for developing a sustainable future. Therefore the collective intuitive interest in &#8220;complexity&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 18:18:04 by W3 Total Cache -->
