The Brother Stephen Debourg Performing Arts Centre at Sacred Heart College / Tridente Architects

© Peter Fisher

As the first major project to be implemented after master planning the entire senior school campus, the Brother Stephen Debourg Performing Arts Centre at Sacred Heart College demonstrates the schools’ focus and a return to its core philosophy of being a teaching institution of its time, maintaining the provision of services par excellence.

Architect: Tridente Architects
Location: , South , 5044,
Engineer: Wallbridge & Gilbert
Quantity Surveyor: Heinrich Consulting
Builder: Romaldi Constructions
Project Area: 1420 sqm
Project Year: 2008
Photographs: Peter Fisher

© Peter Fisher

Reinforcing the fledgling performing arts stream, the new facility signifies this change by the intervention of a contemporary building into a historically significant precinct and prominent location on the grounds. Bridging between existing traditional building stock, the performing art facility nestles comfortably within a grove of established trees in the manicured landscape. The splayed wings of the building offered to the driveway drawing one to the glazed entry and within.

master plan

Visible from a major road, the massing and combination of forms balance contextual composition with a striking simple intrusion. Presenting solid walls to the east, north and west facades reduce unnecessary heat load, yet the building provides transparency to the south landscaped portion of the site. This characteristic, in conjunction with a reduction to a scale in keeping with the adjacent residential buildings, fosters visual connection and promotes passive surveillance.

elevations

The use of a colored paneling system in cardinal purple offers more than just a tenuous link to the adjacent chapel; imbuing the internal spaces and the cloister with a subtle lilac glow to reinforce the spiritual and reverential ambience.

© Peter Fisher

With a program more complex and variable than the simple forms belie, the facility comfortably blends teaching and performance with other ancillary functions enabling it to be utilized by the college, feeder schools and affiliated colleges in the local area.

© Peter Fisher

The use of construction techniques and materials more commonly associated with warehouses has minimized the cost of the base building allowing emphasis to be placed on the internal spaces and facilities. Integration and concealment of services was critical to accommodate the high level of acoustic control and isolation required of the teaching, practice and performance spaces and the quality expected of publicly accessible spaces.

© Peter Fisher

Where possible the use of day lighting has been maximized by the provision of large expanses of glazing, predominately orientated to the south. Elsewhere compact fluorescent and T5 fluorescent fittings have been utilized. With the specific acoustic requirements for performances, practice and studio work it was not possible to utilize any forms of passive ventilation and a reverse cycle air conditioning system has been adopted throughout, with windows generally sealed. To control running costs and reduce energy consumption an economy cycle system has been implemented to utilize unconditioned external air.

sections

The performing art facility does more than just respond directly to the college’s briefed objectives. The building establishes a new design language and palette for development and defining the south-eastern corner of the site and the entry into the college grounds. The varied teaching, performance and entertainment opportunities provided by the adaptable and multi-functional spaces satisfy the brief and provide much more, the flexibility and neutral background necessary to foster the performing arts.

© Peter Fisher

View this project in Google Maps

* Location to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address.
Cite: "The Brother Stephen Debourg Performing Arts Centre at Sacred Heart College / Tridente Architects" 21 Apr 2011. ArchDaily. Accessed 22 Jul 2014. <http://www.archdaily.com/?p=126964>

0 comments

Share your thoughts