Comments on: Mercier House, Lausanne

By: Russian from Tyumen

Russian from Tyumen — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:26:35 +0000

It does not for archdaily! I agree!
compatriots it is a shame With some )))

By: Ceno

Ceno — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:21:41 +0000

Please don’t use local languages.. Let other people from other countries shared your oppinion.

By: Hiroshi

Hiroshi — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:24:36 +0000

Beautiful building, bad article.

By: Steven

Steven — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:41:52 +0000

It is a nice looking building, but this article is weak. Where are the drawings? What can we learn?

By: Arman

Arman — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:04:05 +0000

mcastroni, the building could be significant in many ways… social and cultural context, size, artistic value… Yet, you’ve failed in presenting any of them. There’s only: Long time ago; big entrepeneur; biggest building; don’t-mind-the-poor-pictures-just-look-at-the-pretty-pastiche! Even if I leave the whole pertinence of the post aside (if there was any), the design is irrelevant, except for the “Italian and French Renaissance” doors and the “French and Flemish Gothic” towers and pinnacles? If you want to post historic buildings here, please don’t. But if you really must, make a proper article and justify it.

By: lbessard

lbessard — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:47:30 +0000

What is the interest to show such a building? If there is a good project in it, you must show it.

By: Artem

Artem — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:52:53 +0000

зато в латвийской архитектуре идеи напрч отсутствуют исе клоны и клоны ничего своего :\

By: Artem

Artem — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:47:38 +0000

А у вас енто хде? :)

By: "онанист-конструктивист"

"онанист-конструктивист" — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:28:53 +0000

…Артем,я Вам почти завидую…в))) у нас это еще не ушло к сожалению…причем,был бы настоящий классицизм – ладно уж, так у нас не так ведь все…

By: Artem

Artem — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:19:13 +0000

у нас в Риге полно подобного! время подобного ушло безвозвратно(слава богу):)))