<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1865583594_structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/12556/vakko-headquarters-and-power-media-center-rex/1865583594_structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12556/vakko-headquarters-and-power-media-center-rex/1865583594_structure/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12556/vakko-headquarters-and-power-media-center-rex/1865583594_structure/#comment-227452</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/1865583594_structure.jpg#comment-227452</guid>
		<description>I understand your point, however you are gravely mistaken. If architects were still the &#039;lone-rangers&#039; they once were a couple of centuries ago, your suggestion would hold valid. However, the design process now is much more non-linear. We need those that are constantly asking &quot;How&quot; as much as &quot;Why&quot;, and everyone should be asking how it all comes together. Sometimes the &quot;How&quot; can imply the &quot;Why&quot; as much as the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand your point, however you are gravely mistaken. If architects were still the &#8216;lone-rangers&#8217; they once were a couple of centuries ago, your suggestion would hold valid. However, the design process now is much more non-linear. We need those that are constantly asking &#8220;How&#8221; as much as &#8220;Why&#8221;, and everyone should be asking how it all comes together. Sometimes the &#8220;How&#8221; can imply the &#8220;Why&#8221; as much as the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12556/vakko-headquarters-and-power-media-center-rex/1865583594_structure/#comment-210210</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/1865583594_structure.jpg#comment-210210</guid>
		<description>Architects should think about &quot;Why&quot; before thinking about &quot;How&quot;.

Earthquake, Illumination, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Architects should think about &#8220;Why&#8221; before thinking about &#8220;How&#8221;.</p>
<p>Earthquake, Illumination, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-11 05:05:57 by W3 Total Cache -->
