<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double house / Tham &amp; Videgård Hansson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:35:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/#comment-36311</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12387#comment-36311</guid>
		<description>This is far from a tragedy. In fact it is a nice elegant house. Not flashy or extravagant which is a nice deviation from the overly complex blobs flooding the market. As mentioned above by Arman, its quality that is often missing from the flashy architecture these days. A simple form with nice detailing is not easy and is actually a noble undertaking. My only question is how the external wood will age. The contrast between the warm wood and dark gray walls is beautiful but will fade as the sun bleaches the wood into a light gray tone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is far from a tragedy. In fact it is a nice elegant house. Not flashy or extravagant which is a nice deviation from the overly complex blobs flooding the market. As mentioned above by Arman, its quality that is often missing from the flashy architecture these days. A simple form with nice detailing is not easy and is actually a noble undertaking. My only question is how the external wood will age. The contrast between the warm wood and dark gray walls is beautiful but will fade as the sun bleaches the wood into a light gray tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jupiter</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/#comment-36304</link>
		<dc:creator>jupiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12387#comment-36304</guid>
		<description>An architectural tragedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An architectural tragedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nah-uh. Superman does good &#8230; you&#8217;re doing well. You need to study your grammar, son. &#171; wants and needs</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/#comment-15043</link>
		<dc:creator>Nah-uh. Superman does good &#8230; you&#8217;re doing well. You need to study your grammar, son. &#171; wants and needs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12387#comment-15043</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;egg holder&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;egg holder&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best MoCo Architecture This Week &#124; Gocontempo Design Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/#comment-14790</link>
		<dc:creator>Best MoCo Architecture This Week &#124; Gocontempo Design Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12387#comment-14790</guid>
		<description>[...] Tham &amp; Videgård Hansson Arkitekter&#8217;s Double house at Arch Daily, &#8220;A house organized as a spiralling sequence of four large rooms in four levels. These big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tham &amp; Videgård Hansson Arkitekter&#8217;s Double house at Arch Daily, &#8220;A house organized as a spiralling sequence of four large rooms in four levels. These big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/#comment-14200</link>
		<dc:creator>Arman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12387#comment-14200</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t about design innovation, fb. It&#039;s a fine building. simple, appealing and comfortable. Nothing innovative about it... who cares? why the thirst for innovation? what&#039;s lacking everywhere is quality! This one is good enough! Anyway, I would have enjoyed to see the design work more with the topography, instead of simply carving out its way for half the building in the name of semi-simmetry between the two houses. I don&#039;t see why the two houses had to be on the same height on all levels. Simple level variations could have contributed a lot on composing the diversity that seems to have been attempted on the facade, and even justified it more than just by &quot;orientation, light and views&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t about design innovation, fb. It&#8217;s a fine building. simple, appealing and comfortable. Nothing innovative about it&#8230; who cares? why the thirst for innovation? what&#8217;s lacking everywhere is quality! This one is good enough! Anyway, I would have enjoyed to see the design work more with the topography, instead of simply carving out its way for half the building in the name of semi-simmetry between the two houses. I don&#8217;t see why the two houses had to be on the same height on all levels. Simple level variations could have contributed a lot on composing the diversity that seems to have been attempted on the facade, and even justified it more than just by &#8220;orientation, light and views&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contemporary Art</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/#comment-14168</link>
		<dc:creator>Contemporary Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12387#comment-14168</guid>
		<description>I like the color and the wood stain. It feels very solid.
--
http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the color and the wood stain. It feels very solid.<br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fb</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/#comment-14161</link>
		<dc:creator>fb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12387#comment-14161</guid>
		<description>a semi-detached isn&#039;t really design innovation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a semi-detached isn&#8217;t really design innovation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devoid</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12387/double-house-tham-videgard-hansson/#comment-14147</link>
		<dc:creator>devoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12387#comment-14147</guid>
		<description>This looks more like the &quot;mirror&quot; house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks more like the &#8220;mirror&#8221; house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
