<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Antony House / Fraser Brown MacKenna Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/12352/antony-house-fraser-brown-mackenna-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12352/antony-house-fraser-brown-mackenna-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:27:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12352/antony-house-fraser-brown-mackenna-architects/#comment-26318</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12352#comment-26318</guid>
		<description>thanks !! very helpful post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks !! very helpful post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freq</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12352/antony-house-fraser-brown-mackenna-architects/#comment-13962</link>
		<dc:creator>freq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12352#comment-13962</guid>
		<description>that bluntly untextured wall facing the viewer in picture three will look jolly good once the grimy elements have battered it for a few years. makes you yearn for something with a pattern and greater perceived materiality to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that bluntly untextured wall facing the viewer in picture three will look jolly good once the grimy elements have battered it for a few years. makes you yearn for something with a pattern and greater perceived materiality to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contemporary Art</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12352/antony-house-fraser-brown-mackenna-architects/#comment-13942</link>
		<dc:creator>Contemporary Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12352#comment-13942</guid>
		<description>I think this is a nice solution. Strong, tidy, complete.
--
http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a nice solution. Strong, tidy, complete.<br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12352/antony-house-fraser-brown-mackenna-architects/#comment-13939</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12352#comment-13939</guid>
		<description>Gee, theese appartments look like luxury ones compared to modern Norwegian appartments. There they would only get one of thoose cells, instead of two like here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, theese appartments look like luxury ones compared to modern Norwegian appartments. There they would only get one of thoose cells, instead of two like here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roadkill</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12352/antony-house-fraser-brown-mackenna-architects/#comment-13927</link>
		<dc:creator>roadkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12352#comment-13927</guid>
		<description>for social housing and for London... it looks quite good. i guess any one experiencing life in the neighbouring buildings would testify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for social housing and for London&#8230; it looks quite good. i guess any one experiencing life in the neighbouring buildings would testify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blowback</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/12352/antony-house-fraser-brown-mackenna-architects/#comment-13925</link>
		<dc:creator>blowback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12352#comment-13925</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame that the Peabody Trust didn&#039;t go all &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.primelocation.com/JAGR/JAKN/JAKN26575/PHOTO_01.JPG&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;William and Mary-ish&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame that the Peabody Trust didn&#8217;t go all <a href="http://media.primelocation.com/JAGR/JAKN/JAKN26575/PHOTO_01.JPG" rel="nofollow">William and Mary-ish</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
