Comments on: ORDOS 100 #14: Encore Heureux + G Studio

By: 21

21 — Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:00:55 +0000

ORDOS 100 #14: Encore Heureux + G Studio | ArchDaily http://t.co/pjnzDyP via @archdaily

By: b hale blg

b hale blg — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:33:28 +0000

thermal mass my friend

By: Rui Cunha

Rui Cunha — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:24:22 +0000

Why does this guy uses this brick system when it has no structural advantage to the other systems, is could be for ventilation and light, but it doesn’t work that way. Apparently, this syestem was used to create a reference to some sort of arab architecture, but the strage thing in it, is the fact that they forced an idea of an old arab building, half demolished, to create an idea of a recuperation with a modernist architecture. But in the end, it looks more like some kind of museum than a house – or at least, it doesn’t seem to give the ambient of a house. It’s not that the idea of an internal patio with the rooms facing it isn’t evident. It’s just that it doens’t work as it could. Even more because a reference is made, but not in a respectable way. It’s just that there’s no real know how of arab architecture.

By: ivy yi

ivy yi — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:25:00 +0000

it does look a bit chunky….and i think the expression of the facade looks quite defensive rather than welcoming….

By: hazmanfadzil

hazmanfadzil — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:55:57 +0000

zaman kegawatan ekonomi membuatkan ramai orang mencuba membuat duit secara online

By: scarpasez

scarpasez — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:05:45 +0000

The standard US housing blocks are McMansions; This is McMarketecture. Big, big, big! Yikes. ORDOS is proving to be a sort of unhinged land of ego.

By: Nicolas Bet

Nicolas Bet — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:47:32 +0000

For me ORDOS 100 is just another project of real estate. Just that.

By: ElEmilior

ElEmilior — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:22:35 +0000

A shiny approach to Eduardo Sacriste
He built in Marrakesh, Cuba, and most at all in Tucuman, Argentine.

http://1en100.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html

By: mil

mil — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:14:00 +0000

ORDOS is a decadent proyect……..we have to think in the real meaning of architecture, a good architect is not a star is a man or woman that think in time with the context and real needs in order to be optimistic, not in temporary trends. Ordos can be a laboratory of possibilities not about how fancy can we live.

By: Rokas

Rokas — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:18:36 +0000

To ElMilior-wr’d look with with plasure-just give us a link :D

By: ElEmilior

ElEmilior — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:14:09 +0000

I agree with Fernado Diez. We have to try not to be original but more focus in looking for contextualized solutions. I recomended to take a look on the work of Eduardo Sacriste, an argentinian architect of the 50.

By: Rokas

Rokas — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:00:18 +0000

Agree with fernando diez-how anyone can work withouth a situation?:?

By: amelie

amelie — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:13:02 +0000

Fortress for snipers (chineese) against the mogolian culture / For Occupied Territories in hostile Climate and strange horse riders / where architecture is used as a bricks-bunker without ”Oblique Function” / Is it the right target for Ordos colonisation ! / or just a ”loose to loose” joke.

By: Mário Gonzaga

Mário Gonzaga — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:49:46 +0000

finally a project to stair!

By: Jan Nubel

Jan Nubel — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:58:18 +0000

I STO IN PELTAR ON JESNAVEL

By: FERNANDO DÍEZ

FERNANDO DÍEZ — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:22:20 +0000

I MEAN THAT I ONLY MISS A LITTLE BIT OF ANCHORAGE, THAT WORD USED BY MR STEVEN HALL, IN ORDER TO SAY THAT THE LAND IS A VERY IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF THE PROJECT. AN EASY WAY TO WORK IS DO IT WITH A MODEL, WITHOUT TAKE CARE ABOUT THE PLACE.YOU MAKE AN OBJECT AND YOU SOW IT. ITS NOT MY WAY OF UNDERSTANDING THE ARCHITECTURE. CALL ME ME NOSTALGIG OF REGIONALISM, IF U WANT!

By: DM_A

DM_A — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:29:59 +0000

Well…its not a matter of closed minds… I agree with Fernando Díez when he says that this can end being like a big mixture of such different things that will look like a big Expo, were every country gives its best, but the overall feeling is quite disappointing, and even ugly.
There should be a clear planning that ensures the entity of such a big intervention. And only then, all these little personal architectures can make sense.
And it’s obvious that I don’t like them all, but not as much as to say they’re all “ñordos” (though I’ve laughed a lot with the word).

By: FERNANDO DÍEZ

FERNANDO DÍEZ — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:56:05 +0000

SORRY JAN
IM NOT AGREE WITH U. ENERGY TOTALLY DESAPROFITADA. ARCHITECTURE IN NOT JUST PLAYING CURIOSILY WITH MATERIALS.
LETS RETHINK WHAT AND FOR WHAT IS ARCHITECTURE!

HEALTH FOR EVERYBODY
F10

By: Jan Nubel

Jan Nubel — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:49:30 +0000

NICE POJECT!

I TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH MR. DIEZ
THIS IS A REFERENCE FOR WHAT MUST BE DONE IN EVERY FUTURE CITY!
ONLY CLOSE MINDS REFUSE THE STRENGHT OF THOSE WORKS

SES COPES AVANS O DESPRES D’ANTONIA FONT?
JA PODRIES HAVER DUÏT ES ROUTER…

By: FERNANDO DÍEZ

FERNANDO DÍEZ — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:41:25 +0000

EMPIEZO A PENSAR SI DEBIERA LLAMARSE “ÑORDOS 100″
POR LO HETEROGENEO E INSULSO DE LAS PROPUESTAS. SE ESTA INTENTANDO REALIZAR UNA BANDEJA DE REPOSTERIA DE LA MAS FINA ARQUITECTURA, PERO SE PUEDE DAR EL CASO DE MEZCLAR TANTOS SABORES QUE EL RESULTADO NOS RESULTE TOXICO!!!

SALUD A TODOS