<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Genesis House, &#8220;Palais de Justice&#8221; / PLANDA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:08:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: CMO ARCH</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-32361</link>
		<dc:creator>CMO ARCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-32361</guid>
		<description>I thought the building was okay until I saw the site it was on, then I thought that the long end piece would be great!  I&#039;m not sure why people say that this is a poor design, it&#039;s simple, and makes a lot of sense.  Why can&#039;t buildings that are simple and make sense be considered good architecturally anymore?  I don&#039;t understand half the comments and arguments you people make anymore.  I think whoever up top who commented on the cantilever being conceptual cause of code was right, but if this is conceptual, I think it is great.

Stop complicating everything!  Anyone of you would live in that house!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the building was okay until I saw the site it was on, then I thought that the long end piece would be great!  I&#8217;m not sure why people say that this is a poor design, it&#8217;s simple, and makes a lot of sense.  Why can&#8217;t buildings that are simple and make sense be considered good architecturally anymore?  I don&#8217;t understand half the comments and arguments you people make anymore.  I think whoever up top who commented on the cantilever being conceptual cause of code was right, but if this is conceptual, I think it is great.</p>
<p>Stop complicating everything!  Anyone of you would live in that house!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mexico, Atizapan &#124; New Tamayo Museum &#124; BIG + Rojkind Arquitectos (concurso) - Arquitectura.pt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-30325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mexico, Atizapan &#124; New Tamayo Museum &#124; BIG + Rojkind Arquitectos (concurso) - Arquitectura.pt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-30325</guid>
		<description>[...]  fonte: aqui  Estranha inspira</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  fonte: aqui  Estranha inspira</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-29720</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-29720</guid>
		<description>cruciform is hip again
http://www.sgroh.net/?p=411</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cruciform is hip again<br />
<a href="http://www.sgroh.net/?p=411" rel="nofollow">http://www.sgroh.net/?p=411</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cruciform is hip again. &#124; sgroh.net</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-29633</link>
		<dc:creator>cruciform is hip again. &#124; sgroh.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-29633</guid>
		<description>[...] PLANDA (more on archdaily) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PLANDA (more on archdaily) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: your God</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-28409</link>
		<dc:creator>your God</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-28409</guid>
		<description>OK, here&#039;s my plan. lots of crucifix houses and buildings all over the world, so you would remember, that therefore I exist. please. :(

http://www.dezeen.com/2009/04/28/%E2%80%A8new-tamayo-museum-by-rojkind-arquitectos-and-big/#more-29549</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, here&#8217;s my plan. lots of crucifix houses and buildings all over the world, so you would remember, that therefore I exist. please. :(</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dezeen.com/2009/04/28/%E2%80%A8new-tamayo-museum-by-rojkind-arquitectos-and-big/#more-29549" rel="nofollow">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/04/28/%E2%80%A8new-tamayo-museum-by-rojkind-arquitectos-and-big/#more-29549</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-15884</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-15884</guid>
		<description>Thanks god they aren&#039;t fan of &quot;the artist formerly known as prince&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks god they aren&#8217;t fan of &#8220;the artist formerly known as prince&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illuminous Days &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mein (fast) Traumhaus</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-13986</link>
		<dc:creator>Illuminous Days &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mein (fast) Traumhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-13986</guid>
		<description>[...] Architektenteam aus Paris und New York hat jetzt fast genau so ein Haus, wie ich es gerne hätte, konstruiert. Die Form wäre zwar nichts für mich, ist aber trotzdem richtig cool, weil das ganze Haus nach dem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Architektenteam aus Paris und New York hat jetzt fast genau so ein Haus, wie ich es gerne hätte, konstruiert. Die Form wäre zwar nichts für mich, ist aber trotzdem richtig cool, weil das ganze Haus nach dem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: margo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-13738</link>
		<dc:creator>margo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-13738</guid>
		<description>This is a great and fun to watch, Gas and Xav loved it.If you check the website, Planda did some very interesting projects. Bien ouej Juju! 2R1S for ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great and fun to watch, Gas and Xav loved it.If you check the website, Planda did some very interesting projects. Bien ouej Juju! 2R1S for ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kozi</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-13587</link>
		<dc:creator>kozi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-13587</guid>
		<description>&quot;boring&quot; shape, useless, masturbation video, and crappy music band

-product/toy/transportation designer- (us$85,000 monthly salary)

(lol, why ppl have to sign their position?, does it give more credibility to what they say?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;boring&#8221; shape, useless, masturbation video, and crappy music band</p>
<p>-product/toy/transportation designer- (us$85,000 monthly salary)</p>
<p>(lol, why ppl have to sign their position?, does it give more credibility to what they say?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue Designs - industrial designs for sale</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11726/genesis-house-palais-de-justice-planda/#comment-13501</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Designs - industrial designs for sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11726#comment-13501</guid>
		<description>[...] archdaily  Posted in Architecture, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] archdaily  Posted in Architecture, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
