<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORDOS 100 #11: NL Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: CEH</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-14010</link>
		<dc:creator>CEH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-14010</guid>
		<description>Can any one tell me what this is rendered in? looks like sketch up but not sure.
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can any one tell me what this is rendered in? looks like sketch up but not sure.<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13814</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13814</guid>
		<description>The symmetric facade disposition is really awful.
the first floor plan however is quite interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The symmetric facade disposition is really awful.<br />
the first floor plan however is quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim 'V'</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13676</link>
		<dc:creator>kim 'V'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13676</guid>
		<description>www.openarchitecturenetwork.org.
thought you may be interested in the &#039;classroom&#039; competition on this link. best wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.openarchitecturenetwork.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.openarchitecturenetwork.org</a>.<br />
thought you may be interested in the &#8216;classroom&#8217; competition on this link. best wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kez</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13520</link>
		<dc:creator>kez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13520</guid>
		<description>Fail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ned</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13516</link>
		<dc:creator>ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13516</guid>
		<description>bizzare, not simple, not understandable....want to be more than cool, that is all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bizzare, not simple, not understandable&#8230;.want to be more than cool, that is all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13513</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13513</guid>
		<description>simple, straightforward, intelligent, great project.
bravo NL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simple, straightforward, intelligent, great project.<br />
bravo NL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nzl</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13509</link>
		<dc:creator>nzl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13509</guid>
		<description>dear contporary art:
a neto is hidden in section BB and &quot;winter garden&quot; detail... next week we will try to find a dan flavin in ordos #51</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear contporary art:<br />
a neto is hidden in section BB and &#8220;winter garden&#8221; detail&#8230; next week we will try to find a dan flavin in ordos #51</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sisifo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13493</link>
		<dc:creator>sisifo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13493</guid>
		<description>this is maybe the worst ordos projecto shown in archdaily. the garden, old and repeated idea. the distribution , the form itself , really bad. 

just in case....i didnt like the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is maybe the worst ordos projecto shown in archdaily. the garden, old and repeated idea. the distribution , the form itself , really bad. </p>
<p>just in case&#8230;.i didnt like the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t_F</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13484</link>
		<dc:creator>t_F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13484</guid>
		<description>The Neto bit is the inverted-droplet hammock/cloaca thing that the kid is climbing on in the section.  Who cares if it looks like Neto?  When was the last time you actually climbed inside of a Neto flacid hanging thing?  This one is occupiable.  

Anyway, I appreciate this house a container of potentially great experiences; a domestic cabinet of curiosities.  Thats how a house becomes a home, as Luther Vandross says.
_
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefunctionality.com/blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thefunctionality.com/blog&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Neto bit is the inverted-droplet hammock/cloaca thing that the kid is climbing on in the section.  Who cares if it looks like Neto?  When was the last time you actually climbed inside of a Neto flacid hanging thing?  This one is occupiable.  </p>
<p>Anyway, I appreciate this house a container of potentially great experiences; a domestic cabinet of curiosities.  Thats how a house becomes a home, as Luther Vandross says.<br />
_<br />
<a href="http://www.thefunctionality.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefunctionality.com/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contemporary Art</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/11532/ordos-100-11-nl-architects/#comment-13482</link>
		<dc:creator>Contemporary Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=11532#comment-13482</guid>
		<description>What could this possibly have to do with Neto? Obviously, all of these projects so far have looked a bit more self conscious than we&#039;d like for real buildings. But isn&#039;t that sort of the point of a project like this? Maybe a more reasonable building would look out of place and unreasonable in a neighborhood like this.
--
http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What could this possibly have to do with Neto? Obviously, all of these projects so far have looked a bit more self conscious than we&#8217;d like for real buildings. But isn&#8217;t that sort of the point of a project like this? Maybe a more reasonable building would look out of place and unreasonable in a neighborhood like this.<br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
