
The team of BIG + TNT Nuuk + Ramboll Nuuk + Arkitekti have won the competition to design the new National Gallery of Greenland in the country’s capital Nuuk, among invited proposals totaling 6 Nordic architects. More images and complete press release after the break.

Located on a steep slope overlooking the most beautiful of Greenland’s fjords, the 3000 m2 National Gallery will serve as a cultural and architectural icon for the people of Greenland. The new museum will combine historical and contemporary art of the country in one dynamic institution The winning proposal was selected by a unanimous museum board among 6 proposals, including Norwegian Snøhetta, Finnish Heikkinen‐Komonen, Islandic Studio Granda and Greenlandic Tegnestuen Nuuk.

“The Board has a clear vision: to work for the establishment of an internationally oriented highly professional institution that communicates the continuous project of documenting and developing the Greenlandic national identity through art and culture. Our dream is a national gallery where historic and contemporary art meets circumpolar pieces, Nordic and world art in general. Our dream is an institution that stimulates our curiosity, awake our excitement with its thought‐provoking design and where we all feel at home. Selecting a prominent architect as BIG, I am sure that our chances of realizing that dream are good”, Tuusi Josef Motzfeldt, Greenland’s National Gallery of Art.
As a projection of a geometrically perfect circle on to the steep slope, the new gallery is conceived as a courtyard building that combines a pure geometrical layout with a sensitive adaption to the landscape. The three‐dimensional imprint of the landscape creates a protective ring around the museum’s focal point, the sculpture garden where visitors, personnel, exhibition merge with culture and nature, inside and outside.

“The Danish functionalistic architecture in Nuuk is typically square boxes which ignore the unique nature of Greenland. We therefore propose a national gallery which is both physically and visually in harmony with the dramatic nature, just like life in Greenland is a symbiosis of the nature. We have created a simple, functional and symbolic shape, where the perfect circle is supplied by the local topography which creates a unique hybrid between the abstract shape and the specific location”, Bjarke Ingels, Founder and Partner, BIG.
The slope opens up the sculpture garden towards the city and the view, framing both the sculpture garden and museum functions. A rough looking external façade of white concrete will patina over time and adjust to the local weather, while the circular inner glass façade will consist of a simple and refined frame which contrasts the rough nature and compliments the beautiful view.

” The building will with its simplistic coarseness and harmony with the landscape become a symbol of the current independent Greenlandic artistic and architectural expression.”, Andreas Klok Pedersen, Partner & Project Leader, BIG.
The circular shape of the gallery enables a flexible division of the exhibition into different shapes and sizes, creating a unique framework for the museum’s art. Visitor access to the exhibition happens through a covered opening created by a slight lift in the façade into a lobby with a 180 degree panorama view towards the sculpture garden and the fjord as well as access to the common museum functions, including ticket counters, wardrobe, boutique and a café. The new gallery will create more activity at the waterfront by attracting the whole area is interconnected by a path which like the museum, forms after the shifting inclinations of the terrain. The locals and visitors will be able to admire the clear shape of the gallery which appears as a sculpture or a piece of land‐art.

“Greenland National Gallery for Art will play a significant role for the citizens of Greenland and the inhabitants of Nuuk as a cultural, social, political, urban and architectural focal point that opens towards the city and the world through its perfect circular geometry and shape”, Bjarke Ingels, Stifter & Partner, BIG.
Architect: BIG
Location: Nuuk, Greenland
Partner in charge: Bjarke Ingels, Andreas Pedersen
Project leader: Jakob Henke
Collaboration: TNT Nuuk, Rambøll Nuuk, Arkitekti, MIR, Glessner Group
Team: Daniel Selensky, Ji –young Yoon, Gul Ertekin, Aleksander Tokarz, Alessio Zenaro, Johan Cool, Nicklas Antoni Rasch
Client: Nunatta Eqqumiitsulianik Saqqummersitsivia
Size: 3,000 sqm
Images: Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- Courtesy of BIG
- model 01
- model 02
- model 03
- model 04
- model 05
- detail 01
- detail 02
- detail 03
- east elevation
- north elevation
- south elevation
- west elevation
- explosion axonometry
- first floor plan
- second floor plan
- ground floor plan
- core section
- cross section
- section 01
- unrolled section
- site plan
- daylight diagram 01
- daylight diagram 02
- daylight diagram 03
- axonometric diagram 01
- axonometric diagram 01
- axonometric diagram 01
- axonometric diagram 01
- axonometric diagram 01
- axonometric diagram 01
- axonometric diagram 01
- program diagram 01
- program diagram 02
- program diagram 03
- program diagram 04
- program diagram 05
- program diagram 06















































Yes… is more of the same.
Nice. I see more sensitivity than what BIG is usually capable of.
They are certainly never afraid to emphasize the DRAMA in their renderings. This first few images look like the End of Days…
Regardless, there are few architects whose work is so soundly based on analytical responses to the context and program.
I would say the work is programmatic brutalism in the dutch spirit but surely not sound contextualism. Dun, BBV, W & many others reveal the monumental shape making agenda.
Dude, stop hyping without reason. Theay allways outsource models to Luxigon for renders, like allmost everyone else. It’s Luxigon, not BIG that creating DRAMA.
Jeez…again? Really? It’s not even unique!
It doesn’t need to be unique in my opinion. It is good though.
Awesome renderings. I’m not sure the building will live up to them…
haha! good one
the renderings are quite artistic, fantastic job here. even rendering #1 might be wrong in scale.
the design – for sure not bad. a typical “big” design (with some influence took from sanaa and even perhaps steven holl by regarding the long ramps here (of course now you can say – have a look on the shanghai pavillion from them….). most beautiful one is rendering #2 with the 2 childs looking to the big void outside. very impressing!
Love the way the project is represented: elaborates are very direct and simple. Only thing I can’t read the connection beetween the circular form and the contest.
Agenda is not just something only about form
the good thing is that this house doesnt want to be so big as other big houses. Congratulations, it is beautiful.
congratulations…..sensible design….the renders are too good….
Looks like BIG changes…. nice expirience…. more poeticaly indeed…
Renderings are made by MIR but not by Luxigon…
Great work, another project that I look and say… Why we do not think like that before?
Are these “concept” details?
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
not sure if they are oversimplifying the design process, they seem more like afterthoughts to me. just quick simply diagrams that attempt at proving their point. it would be nice to see some of the ‘original’ (if there are any) diagrams/sketches that were created
MIR rulezzz!