<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Openhouse / XTEN Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:43:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-59927</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-59927</guid>
		<description>Love it, love it, love it............
No more words to development..

Fantastic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it, love it, love it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
No more words to development..</p>
<p>Fantastic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: affiliatefreeprogram</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-53863</link>
		<dc:creator>affiliatefreeprogram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-53863</guid>
		<description>Hi, what inspires you to post articles about this topic? It is very informative and enriches my knowledge!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, what inspires you to post articles about this topic? It is very informative and enriches my knowledge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evalyn Dominguez</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-45622</link>
		<dc:creator>Evalyn Dominguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 01:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-45622</guid>
		<description>wonderful...this is worth alot of money about $99,800 i would say maybe even more good work(:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonderful&#8230;this is worth alot of money about $99,800 i would say maybe even more good work(:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ultra man</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-41164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ultra man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-41164</guid>
		<description>@ Nullifidian, I think I do agree with you, of course architecture should aim high. My comment was on the fact that the way this beautiful house has been portrayed for the media is dull, thus for average coffee table books, then it is not aiming high enough. 
I think the interior designer should have made it more hedonistic, and less boring in terms of interior. It is trying to hard to please the middle class taste, and should try to reach for the sublime by using more sophisticated material, or maybe playing with vulgarity and luxury. In a way this house looks very nouveau-riche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Nullifidian, I think I do agree with you, of course architecture should aim high. My comment was on the fact that the way this beautiful house has been portrayed for the media is dull, thus for average coffee table books, then it is not aiming high enough.<br />
I think the interior designer should have made it more hedonistic, and less boring in terms of interior. It is trying to hard to please the middle class taste, and should try to reach for the sublime by using more sophisticated material, or maybe playing with vulgarity and luxury. In a way this house looks very nouveau-riche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nullifidian</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-40845</link>
		<dc:creator>Nullifidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-40845</guid>
		<description>“No, why ? Can you read any marxism, or even a single word of social struggle in my comment ?”

No, and that&#039;s the problem. I&#039;d prefer an honest class struggle politics to the mindless naysaying exhibited here. Your sole objection to the house was that it was beautiful enough to be an entry in a coffee table book. By that standard, why not stump for cardboard boxes or rows of shanties? I haven&#039;t seen them exalted on people&#039;s coffee tables.

One hopes that the point of architecture is to create something that *somebody* will find aesthetically pleasing as well as functional. So you are always going to be able to sneer that the people who might like a piece of architecture are the Wrong Kind of People, but it&#039;s still engaging in the worst kind of ridiculous, impotent BoBo snobbery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“No, why ? Can you read any marxism, or even a single word of social struggle in my comment ?”</p>
<p>No, and that&#8217;s the problem. I&#8217;d prefer an honest class struggle politics to the mindless naysaying exhibited here. Your sole objection to the house was that it was beautiful enough to be an entry in a coffee table book. By that standard, why not stump for cardboard boxes or rows of shanties? I haven&#8217;t seen them exalted on people&#8217;s coffee tables.</p>
<p>One hopes that the point of architecture is to create something that *somebody* will find aesthetically pleasing as well as functional. So you are always going to be able to sneer that the people who might like a piece of architecture are the Wrong Kind of People, but it&#8217;s still engaging in the worst kind of ridiculous, impotent BoBo snobbery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interior Designs</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-39917</link>
		<dc:creator>Interior Designs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-39917</guid>
		<description>The views are worth dying for. Nice use of greenery too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The views are worth dying for. Nice use of greenery too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tannaz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-33225</link>
		<dc:creator>tannaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-33225</guid>
		<description>wo0wwwwwww, i realy cant say anything cause its wonderfull !!!    would u please send me some pictures from the out side view which is show every side</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wo0wwwwwww, i realy cant say anything cause its wonderfull !!!    would u please send me some pictures from the out side view which is show every side</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-33223</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-33223</guid>
		<description>No, why ? Can you read any marxism, or even a single word of social struggle in my comment ? No, it&#039;s just a comment on the current trend of &quot;what is good taste&quot; for the bourgeoisie...
This house is classy for sure, but maybe missing a touch of vulgarity, that would make it definitely interesting...or maybe it&#039;s just the charmless interior ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, why ? Can you read any marxism, or even a single word of social struggle in my comment ? No, it&#8217;s just a comment on the current trend of &#8220;what is good taste&#8221; for the bourgeoisie&#8230;<br />
This house is classy for sure, but maybe missing a touch of vulgarity, that would make it definitely interesting&#8230;or maybe it&#8217;s just the charmless interior ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nullifidian</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-32987</link>
		<dc:creator>Nullifidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 03:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-32987</guid>
		<description>&quot;So upper middle class cliche it makes my eyes bleed…&quot;

Would you suggest a cardboard box in an alley off of Wiltshire Blvd. instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So upper middle class cliche it makes my eyes bleed…&#8221;</p>
<p>Would you suggest a cardboard box in an alley off of Wiltshire Blvd. instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefano Ricci</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/10483/openhouse-xten-architecture/#comment-30943</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=10483#comment-30943</guid>
		<description>This project reminds me another italian one, still in progress.

Some pics here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tissellistudioarchitetti/show/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This project reminds me another italian one, still in progress.</p>
<p>Some pics here: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tissellistudioarchitetti/show/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/tissellistudioarchitetti/show/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
